Suppr超能文献

法国姑息治疗服务中的镇静实践:全国时点患病率分析。

Sedation practices in palliative care services across France: a nationwide point-prevalence analysis.

机构信息

Palliative Care Department, University Hospital Centre Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France

Epicene Team, Inserm UMR 1219, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

出版信息

BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024 Jan 8;13(e3):e1326-e1334. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004261.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Terminally ill patients may require sedation to relieve refractory suffering. The prevalence and modalities of this practice in palliative care services remain unclear. This study estimated the prevalence of all sedation leading to a deep unconsciousness, whether transitory, with an undetermined duration, or maintained until death, for terminally ill patients referred to a home-based or hospital-based palliative care service.

METHODS

We conducted a national, multicentre, observational, prospective, cross-sectional study. In total, 331 centres participated, including academic/non-academic and public/private institutions. The participating institutions provided hospital-based or home-based palliative care for 5714 terminally ill patients during the study.

RESULTS

In total, 156 patients received sedation (prevalence of 2.7%; 95% CI, 2.3 to 3.2); these patients were equally distributed between 'transitory', 'undetermined duration' and 'maintained until death' sedation types. The prevalence was 0.7% at home and 8.0% in palliative care units. The median age of the patients was 70 years (Q1-Q3: 61-83 years); 51% were women and 78.8% had cancers. Almost all sedation events occurred at a hospital (90.4%), mostly in specialised beds (74.4%). In total, 39.1% of patients were unable to provide consent; only two had written advance directives. A collegial procedure was implemented in 80.4% of sedations intended to be maintained until death. Midazolam was widely used (85.9%), regardless of the sedation type.

CONCLUSIONS

This nationwide study provides insight into sedation practices in palliative care institutions. We found a low prevalence for all practices, with the highest prevalence among most reinforced palliative care providers, and an equal frequency of all practices.

摘要

目的

临终患者可能需要镇静来缓解无法缓解的痛苦。在姑息治疗服务中,这种做法的流行程度和方式仍不清楚。本研究估计了所有导致深度无意识的镇静的流行程度,无论是短暂的、持续时间不确定的,还是维持到死亡的,对于转介到基于家庭或基于医院的姑息治疗服务的终末期患者。

方法

我们进行了一项全国性、多中心、观察性、前瞻性、横断面研究。共有 331 个中心参与,包括学术/非学术和公立/私立机构。参与的机构在研究期间为 5714 名终末期患者提供了基于医院或基于家庭的姑息治疗。

结果

共有 156 名患者接受了镇静治疗(发生率为 2.7%;95%CI,2.3 至 3.2);这些患者在“短暂”、“持续时间不确定”和“维持到死亡”的镇静类型之间平均分配。家庭中的发生率为 0.7%,姑息治疗病房中的发生率为 8.0%。患者的中位年龄为 70 岁(Q1-Q3:61-83 岁);51%为女性,78.8%患有癌症。几乎所有镇静事件都发生在医院(90.4%),主要发生在专科病床(74.4%)。共有 39.1%的患者无法提供同意;只有两名患者有书面预先指示。在 80.4%的意图维持到死亡的镇静中实施了合议程序。咪达唑仑被广泛使用(85.9%),无论镇静类型如何。

结论

这项全国性研究提供了姑息治疗机构镇静实践的见解。我们发现所有实践的发生率都很低,在强化姑息治疗提供者中发生率最高,所有实践的频率相等。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a13d/10850836/70bf7e1bdb5f/spcare-2023-004261f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验