• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病慢性肢体威胁性缺血的血运重建选择:两项近期试验的启示

Revascularisation Options for Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia in Diabetes: Implications From Two Recent Trials.

作者信息

Lin Jaime H X, Papanas Nikolaos, Zayed Hany, Vas Prashanth R J

机构信息

Diabetes and Diabetic Foot, King's College NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Department of Medicine, Woodlands Health, Singapore.

出版信息

Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2025 Mar;24(1):7-11. doi: 10.1177/15347346231188874. Epub 2023 Jul 18.

DOI:10.1177/15347346231188874
PMID:37464779
Abstract

Chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) is a severe form of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and is associated with an increased risk of amputation, mortality, and significantly impaired quality of life. International guidelines recommend considering timely revascularisation and optimal medical therapy to improve limb perfusion in individuals with CLTI. The 2 primary revascularization approaches for CLTI are open bypass surgery (BS) and endovascular therapy (EV), however, there is currently no consensus on the best initial treatment strategy for CLTI, leading to uncertainty among clinicians. To shed light on this issue, 2 recent trials, namely best endovascular versus best surgical therapy in patients with CLI (BEST-CLI) and bypass versus angioplasty for severe ischaemia of the leg (BASIL-2), have tried to provide valuable insights. While a definitive conclusion on the optimal revascularisation approach is still pending, these trials offer immediate and clinically relevant information to the diabetic foot multidisciplinary team. The trials encompassed a distinct range of patient cohorts and included participants with varying degrees of medical and physical frailty. Taken together, their findings, highlight the need for an individualised revascularisation strategy which accounts for underlying comorbidities, risk factors, disease severity, availability of suitable bypass conduits, surgical risks, and timely access to procedures. Regardless of the chosen strategy, early referral of patients with diabetes and CLTI to a specialist team within a multidisciplinary environment is crucial. Comprehensive care should encompass essential elements such as adequate debridement, infection control, offloading, glycaemic control, smoking cessation, and patient education. By addressing these aspects, healthcare providers can optimise the management and outcomes for individuals with CLTI and diabetes.

摘要

慢性肢体威胁性缺血(CLTI)是外周动脉疾病(PAD)的一种严重形式,与截肢、死亡风险增加以及生活质量显著受损相关。国际指南建议考虑及时进行血运重建和优化药物治疗,以改善CLTI患者的肢体灌注。CLTI的两种主要血运重建方法是开放旁路手术(BS)和血管内治疗(EV),然而,目前对于CLTI的最佳初始治疗策略尚无共识,这导致临床医生存在不确定性。为了阐明这个问题,最近的两项试验,即CLI患者最佳血管内治疗与最佳手术治疗(BEST-CLI)以及腿部严重缺血的旁路手术与血管成形术(BASIL-2),试图提供有价值的见解。虽然关于最佳血运重建方法的明确结论仍未得出,但这些试验为糖尿病足多学科团队提供了即时且与临床相关的信息。这些试验涵盖了不同范围的患者队列,包括具有不同程度医疗和身体虚弱的参与者。综合来看,他们的研究结果强调了需要一种个性化的血运重建策略,该策略要考虑潜在的合并症、风险因素、疾病严重程度、合适旁路管道的可用性、手术风险以及及时获得手术治疗的机会。无论选择何种策略,在多学科环境中将糖尿病和CLTI患者尽早转诊至专科团队至关重要。全面的护理应包括充分清创、感染控制、减负、血糖控制、戒烟和患者教育等基本要素。通过关注这些方面,医疗服务提供者可以优化CLTI和糖尿病患者的管理及治疗效果。

相似文献

1
Revascularisation Options for Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia in Diabetes: Implications From Two Recent Trials.糖尿病慢性肢体威胁性缺血的血运重建选择:两项近期试验的启示
Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2025 Mar;24(1):7-11. doi: 10.1177/15347346231188874. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
2
Vein bypass first vs. best endovascular treatment first revascularisation strategy for chronic limb-threatening ischaemia due to infra-popliteal disease: the BASIL-2 RCT.静脉旁路术优先与最佳血管内治疗优先血运重建策略治疗下肢严重缺血性疾病:BASIL-2 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(65):1-72. doi: 10.3310/YTFV4524.
3
Global Vascular Guidelines on the Management of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.全球血管指南:慢性肢体威胁性缺血的管理。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Jul;58(1S):S1-S109.e33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 Jun 8.
4
Clinical outcomes of bypass-first versus endovascular-first strategy in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia due to infrageniculate arterial disease.对于因膝下动脉疾病导致慢性肢体威胁性缺血的患者,采用旁路优先与血管内优先策略的临床结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jan;69(1):156-163.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.05.244.
5
The impact of revascularization strategy on clinical failure, hemodynamic failure, and chronic limb-threatening ischemia symptoms in the BEST-CLI Trial.在 BEST-CLI 试验中,血运重建策略对临床失败、血流动力学失败和慢性肢体威胁性缺血症状的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Dec;80(6):1755-1765.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.07.085. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
6
Surgery or endovascular therapy for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia requiring infrapopliteal interventions.慢性肢体缺血高危患者的下肢动脉腔内治疗或手术治疗。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Nov;80(5):1515-1524. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.05.049. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
7
Impact of Bypass Conduit and Early Technical Failure on Revascularization for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.旁路血管及早期技术失败对慢性肢体威胁性缺血血管重建的影响
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Mar;18(3):e014716. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014716. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
8
Editor's Choice - Relationship Between Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS) and Clinical Outcomes Following Revascularisation for Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia in the Bypass Versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL)-1 Trial.编辑精选——BASIL-1 试验中全球肢体解剖分期系统(GLASS)与下肢严重缺血性病变的旁路与血管成形术比较(BASIL)-1 试验中慢性肢体威胁性缺血再血管化后的临床结果之间的关系。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020 Nov;60(5):687-695. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.06.042. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
9
A vein bypass first versus a best endovascular treatment first revascularisation strategy for patients with chronic limb threatening ischaemia who required an infra-popliteal, with or without an additional more proximal infra-inguinal revascularisation procedure to restore limb perfusion (BASIL-2): an open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial.对于需要进行 below-the-knee(小腿)、伴或不伴额外更近端 below-inguinal(腹股沟下)血运重建以恢复肢体灌注的慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者,静脉旁路优先与最佳血管内治疗优先再血管化策略的比较(BASIL-2):一项开放标签、随机、多中心、3 期试验。
Lancet. 2023 May 27;401(10390):1798-1809. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00462-2. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
10
Contemporary (2009-2014) clinical outcomes after femoropopliteal bypass surgery for chronic limb threatening ischemia are inferior to those reported in the UK Bypass versus Angioplasty for Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL) trial (1999-2004).当代(2009-2014 年)股腘旁路手术治疗慢性肢体威胁性缺血的临床结果劣于英国旁路与血管成形术治疗严重肢体缺血(BASIL)试验(1999-2004 年)报道的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jun;69(6):1840-1847. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.08.197. Epub 2019 Mar 7.