• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

COVID-19 社交隔离对健康社会决定因素的早期影响及其对韩国大学生心理健康和生活质量的影响。

Early impact of COVID-19 social distancing on social determinants of health and their effects on mental health and quality of life of Korean undergraduate students.

机构信息

Department of Regulatory Science, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Institute of Regulatory Innovation Through Science, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 3;11:1197143. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1197143. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1197143
PMID:37465174
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10352082/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to investigate the association between social determinants of health and perception of COVID-19 social distancing/mental health/quality of life during COVID-19 social distancing in Korean undergraduate students using online survey data augmented with natural language processing.

METHODS

An online cross-sectional survey including sociodemographic characteristics, students' perceptions of COVID-19 social distancing, and social determinants of health was conducted between July and November in 2020. We conducted logistic regression analysis to investigate the relationship between social determinants of health (independent variables) and perceptions of COVID-19 social distancing, mental health, and quality of life (dependent variables). This association was augmented using sentiment analysis and word clouds by visualizing open-ended comments on COVID-19 social-distancing policies.

RESULTS

Data were collected from 1,276 undergraduate students. Participants who experienced negative impacts on their social-networking activities due to COVID-19 social distancing were at significantly higher odds to perceive COVID-19 social distancing as not being beneficial [odds ratio (OR) = 1.948, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.254-3.027], to have increased stress levels (OR = 1.619, 95% CI 1.051-2.496), and to experience decreased quality of life over 5 weeks (OR = 2.230, 95% CI 1.448-3.434) against those who answered neutrally. In contrast, Participants who reported positive perceptions of social-networking activities during the COVID-19 pandemic had lower odds of feeling depressed or anxious (OR = 0.498, 95% CI 0.278-0.894) and reporting a low quality of life over 5 weeks (OR = 0.461, 95% CI 0.252-0.842) compared to those who reported neutral perceptions. Furthermore, the results of the word cloud and sentiment analyses showed that most students perceived social distancing negatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The government's social-distancing policy to prevent the spread of COVID-19 may have had a negative impact, particularly on undergraduate students' social-networking activities. This highlights the need for greater social support for this population, including access to psychotherapeutic resources, and improvements in policies to prevent infectious diseases while still maintaining social connections.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在使用在线调查数据和自然语言处理技术,调查韩国大学生在 COVID-19 社交隔离期间,社会决定因素与对 COVID-19 社交距离、心理健康和生活质量的感知之间的关联。

方法

2020 年 7 月至 11 月期间,进行了一项包含社会人口统计学特征、学生对 COVID-19 社交隔离的看法以及社会决定因素的在线横断面调查。我们进行了逻辑回归分析,以调查社会决定因素(自变量)与对 COVID-19 社交隔离、心理健康和生活质量(因变量)的感知之间的关系。通过可视化有关 COVID-19 社交隔离政策的开放式评论,使用情感分析和词云来增强这种关联。

结果

共收集了 1276 名大学生的数据。由于 COVID-19 社交隔离而对其社交活动产生负面影响的参与者,对 COVID-19 社交隔离的看法显著更倾向于认为其无益[比值比(OR)=1.948,95%置信区间(CI)1.254-3.027],压力水平增加(OR=1.619,95%CI 1.051-2.496),且在 5 周内生活质量下降(OR=2.230,95%CI 1.448-3.434),而对中性回答的参与者则相反。相比之下,报告在 COVID-19 大流行期间对社交活动有积极看法的参与者,感到沮丧或焦虑的可能性较低(OR=0.498,95%CI 0.278-0.894),并且在 5 周内生活质量较低的可能性较低(OR=0.461,95%CI 0.252-0.842),而对中性看法的参与者则相反。此外,词云分析和情感分析的结果表明,大多数学生对社交距离持负面看法。

结论

政府为预防 COVID-19 传播而采取的社交隔离政策可能产生了负面影响,尤其是对大学生的社交活动。这突显了需要为这一人群提供更大的社会支持,包括获得心理治疗资源,以及改进传染病预防政策,同时保持社交联系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e05/10352082/a8e74ef876fb/fpubh-11-1197143-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e05/10352082/491a68b24e32/fpubh-11-1197143-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e05/10352082/a8e74ef876fb/fpubh-11-1197143-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e05/10352082/491a68b24e32/fpubh-11-1197143-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e05/10352082/a8e74ef876fb/fpubh-11-1197143-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Early impact of COVID-19 social distancing on social determinants of health and their effects on mental health and quality of life of Korean undergraduate students.COVID-19 社交隔离对健康社会决定因素的早期影响及其对韩国大学生心理健康和生活质量的影响。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 3;11:1197143. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1197143. eCollection 2023.
2
How are Brazilian university students coping with the COVID-19 pandemic? Results of an online survey on psychosocial well-being, perceived burdens, and attitudes toward social distancing and vaccination.巴西大学生如何应对 COVID-19 大流行?一项关于心理社会健康、感知负担以及对社交距离和疫苗接种态度的在线调查结果。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 26;18(4):e0284190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284190. eCollection 2023.
3
Students' Views towards Sars-Cov-2 Mass Asymptomatic Testing, Social Distancing and Self-Isolation in a University Setting during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study.学生对 COVID-19 大流行期间大学环境中 SARS-CoV-2 大规模无症状检测、社交距离和自我隔离的看法:一项定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 15;18(8):4182. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084182.
4
Demographics, Socioeconomic Status, Social Distancing, Psychosocial Factors and Psychological Well-Being among Undergraduate Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间大学生的人口统计学特征、社会经济地位、社交距离、心理社会因素与心理健康状况
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 6;18(14):7215. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147215.
5
Knowledge, socio-cognitive perceptions and the practice of hand hygiene and social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study of UK university students.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,知识、社会认知感知以及手部卫生和社会隔离实践:对英国大学生的横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Mar 1;21(1):426. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10461-0.
6
Social contact and the perceived impact of social distancing on health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic among community dwelling older adults taking part in the OPAL cohort study.在参与 OPAL 队列研究的社区居住的老年人群体中,社交接触以及对 COVID-19 大流行期间社交隔离对健康结果的感知影响。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 5;24(1):1510. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18950-8.
7
The impacts of coping style and perceived social support on the mental health of undergraduate students during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic in China: a multicenter survey.应对方式和感知社会支持对中国 COVID-19 大流行早期阶段大学生心理健康的影响:一项多中心调查。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 27;21(1):530. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03546-y.
8
Analyzing the Effect of Social Distancing Policies on Traffic at Sinchon Station, South Korea, during the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020 and 2021.分析 2020 年和 2021 年 COVID-19 大流行期间韩国新村站社交距离政策对交通的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 13;19(14):8535. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148535.
9
Social isolation in COVID-19: a comparative study between Korea and Vietnam.COVID-19 下的社会隔离:韩国与越南的比较研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Aug 16;23(1):1556. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16491-0.
10
Social Distancing among Medical Students during the 2019 Coronavirus Disease Pandemic in China: Disease Awareness, Anxiety Disorder, Depression, and Behavioral Activities.中国医学生在 2019 冠状病毒病大流行期间的社交隔离:疾病认知、焦虑障碍、抑郁和行为活动。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 14;17(14):5047. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145047.

引用本文的文献

1
Subgroup Behaviors and Factors Influencing Compliance With COVID-19 Preventive Measures Among Undergraduate Students in Southern Thailand.泰国南部大学生遵守 COVID-19 预防措施的亚组行为和影响因素。
Int J Public Health. 2024 Sep 6;69:1606788. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1606788. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Adherence to COVID-19 health protocols in an online news context in the Philippines: A manifest content analysis.在菲律宾的在线新闻环境中遵守 COVID-19 卫生协议:一项显在内容分析。
Public Health Nurs. 2023 May-Jun;40(3):382-393. doi: 10.1111/phn.13179. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
2
Evaluation online learning of undergraduate students under lockdown amidst COVID-19 Pandemic: The online learning experience and students' satisfaction.新冠疫情封锁期间本科生在线学习评估:在线学习体验与学生满意度
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2021 Sep;128:106160. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106160. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
3
Social Determinants of Health-An Approach Taken at CDC.
健康的社会决定因素——美国疾病控制与预防中心采取的一种方法
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2022;28(6):589-594. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001626. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
4
Academic stress, COVID-19 anxiety, and quality of life among nursing students: The mediating role of resilience.护理专业学生的学业压力、新冠焦虑和生活质量:韧性的中介作用。
Int Nurs Rev. 2023 Mar;70(1):34-42. doi: 10.1111/inr.12774. Epub 2022 May 31.
5
Social determinants related to COVID-19 infection.与 COVID-19 感染相关的社会决定因素。
Nurs Health Sci. 2022 Jun;24(2):499-507. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12947. Epub 2022 May 21.
6
Relationship Between Psychological Impacts of COVID-19 and Loneliness in Patients With Dementia: A Cross-Sectional Study From Iran.伊朗一项横断面研究:新冠疫情对痴呆症患者的心理影响与孤独感之间的关系
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 6;13:814676. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.814676. eCollection 2022.
7
The early impact of the global lockdown on post-secondary students and staff: A global, descriptive study.全球封锁对高等教育学生和教职员工的早期影响:一项全球性描述性研究。
SAGE Open Med. 2022 Jan 25;10:20503121221074480. doi: 10.1177/20503121221074480. eCollection 2022.
8
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Mental Well-Being. A Nationwide Online Survey Covering Three Pandemic Waves in Poland.新冠疫情对心理健康的影响。波兰一项覆盖疫情三波高峰的全国性在线调查。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 17;12:804123. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.804123. eCollection 2021.
9
Perceptions, satisfactions, and performance of undergraduate students during Covid-19 emergency remote teaching.本科生在新冠疫情期间远程教学的感知、满意度和表现。
Anat Sci Educ. 2022 Jan;15(1):42-56. doi: 10.1002/ase.2161.
10
Changes in Daily Life during the COVID-19 Pandemic among South Korean Older Adults with Chronic Diseases: A Qualitative Study.新冠疫情期间韩国慢性病老年患者日常生活变化的定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 24;18(13):6781. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136781.