Suppr超能文献

基于热性惊厥团队的学习。

Febrile Seizure Team-based Learning.

作者信息

Piroutek Mary Jane

机构信息

Children's Hospital of Orange County, Department of Emergency Medicine, Orange, CA.

出版信息

J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2020 Oct 15;5(4):T45-T68. doi: 10.21980/J8JD12. eCollection 2020 Oct.

Abstract

AUDIENCE

This modified team-based learning (mTBL) is designed for junior and senior emergency medicine and pediatric residents.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Febrile seizures are the most common cause of seizures in children under 5 years old and are frequently evaluated in the emergency department.1,2 Febrile seizures can be frightening for parents to witness and often necessitate extensive parental reassurance and education by the emergency medicine (EM) provider. Most febrile seizures are brief, do not require a broad workup, and have a benign prognosis. With introduction of conjugate vaccines for type B (Hib) and in the United States in 1987 and 2000 respectively, the incidence of bacterial meningitis is low, but still present.3-7 The most recent American Academy of Pediatrics practice guidelines no longer recommend routine lumbar puncture on children presenting with simple febrile seizures.2 A review of the current literature shows that bacterial meningitis in children after a complex febrile seizure is unexpected when the clinical examination is not suggestive of meningitis or encephalitis.5-8 The goal of this mTBL is for residents to feel comfortable counseling parents about their child currently in the emergency department and the future risk of recurrence. The second goal is for residents to identify which patients presenting with fever and a seizure do require workup beyond simply identifying the source of the fever.

EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES

By the end of this educational session, the learner will:List the characteristics of a simple febrile seizure.Discuss the management of a child with a simple vs. complex febrile seizure.Discuss the risk factors that correlate with an increased risk of a subsequent febrile seizure.Determine when a lumbar puncture should be considered in a febrile child with a seizure.Identify when to give anti-epileptics and construct an algorithm for their use.Discuss with parents, provide education and return precautions.

EDUCATIONAL METHODS

This didactic session is a mTBL. The classic learner responsible content (LRC) has been omitted and a short PowerPoint presentation is given to start the session before the individual and group readiness assessment tests.

RESEARCH METHODS

A post-TBL survey was given to each participant. A Likert scale was used to assess each participant's assessment for the learning session in the following categories: overall, context, quality, and speaker feedback. They were also given fields to enter ways in which they would improve their practice after this learning exercise and suggestions they had for improving the current educational opportunity.

RESULTS

In the pilot session of this mTBL, 4 out of 11 participants (EM residents and pediatric emergency medicine [PEM] fellows) completed the post-TBL survey. Overall, this session was rated as "outstanding" (Likert 5/5) by 1 and "excellent" (Likert 4/5) by 3 for a weighted average of 4.25. All participants completing the survey found the activity "highly relevant," "very engaging," and wanted to repeat the activity in the future. Negative feedback consisted of wanting a video of a child having a seizure to be played and having a more interactive PowerPoint portion of the session like the interaction in the readiness assessment tests and group application exercise.

DISCUSSION

Overall the content was effective as evidenced by the list of ways residents said they would improve their practice on the post-TBL survey. In the future, I would extend the session from 60 minutes to 90 minutes to allow for more time for the group application exercise and discussion of answers. I found this to be an enjoyable, highly interactive experience with high engagement of the residents during the session.

TOPICS

Simple febrile seizures, complex febrile seizures, seizure with fever, meningitis, lumbar puncture, status epilepticus.

摘要

受众

这种改良的基于团队的学习(mTBL)是为急诊医学和儿科住院医师的低年级和高年级学员设计的。

引言/背景:热性惊厥是5岁以下儿童惊厥最常见的原因,常在急诊科进行评估。1,2 热性惊厥会让家长目睹时感到恐惧,急诊医学(EM)提供者通常需要对家长进行大量的安慰和教育。大多数热性惊厥持续时间短,不需要广泛的检查,预后良好。随着1987年和2000年分别在美国引入B型流感嗜血杆菌(Hib)结合疫苗,细菌性脑膜炎的发病率较低,但仍然存在。3-7 美国儿科学会最新的实践指南不再建议对单纯热性惊厥的儿童进行常规腰椎穿刺。2 对当前文献的回顾表明,当临床检查未提示脑膜炎或脑炎时,复杂性热性惊厥后儿童发生细菌性脑膜炎是意外情况。5-8 这种mTBL的目标是让住院医师能够自如地向家长提供有关其正在急诊科就诊孩子的咨询以及未来复发风险的信息。第二个目标是让住院医师识别哪些发热伴惊厥的患者除了简单地确定发热源之外还需要进一步检查。

教育目标

在本次教育课程结束时,学习者将:列出单纯热性惊厥的特征。讨论单纯性与复杂性热性惊厥患儿的管理。讨论与后续热性惊厥风险增加相关的危险因素。确定在发热伴惊厥的儿童中何时应考虑进行腰椎穿刺。确定何时给予抗癫痫药物并构建其使用算法。与家长讨论、提供教育并告知复诊注意事项。

教育方法

本次讲授课程是一种mTBL。经典的学习者负责内容(LRC)已被省略,在进行个人和小组准备情况评估测试之前,先进行一个简短的PowerPoint演示来开始课程。

研究方法

在基于团队的学习(TBL)之后对每位参与者进行了调查。使用李克特量表从以下类别评估每位参与者对学习课程的评价:总体、背景、质量和对演讲者的反馈。还为他们提供了一些栏目,让他们填写在这次学习活动后他们将如何改进自己的实践,以及他们对改进当前教育机会的建议。

结果

在这个mTBL的试点课程中,11名参与者(急诊医学住院医师和儿科急诊医学[PEM]研究员)中有4人完成了TBL后的调查。总体而言,1人将本次课程评为“优秀”(李克特5/5),3人评为“出色”(李克特4/5),加权平均分为4.25。所有完成调查的参与者都认为该活动“高度相关”“非常有吸引力”,并希望在未来重复该活动。负面反馈包括希望播放一段儿童惊厥的视频,以及希望课程中有一个像准备情况评估测试和小组应用练习那样更具互动性的PowerPoint部分。

讨论

总体而言,从住院医师在TBL后调查中所说的他们将如何改进自己实践的内容可以证明内容是有效的。未来,我会将课程从60分钟延长到90分钟,以便有更多时间进行小组应用练习和答案讨论。我发现这是一次愉快、高度互动的体验,住院医师在课程中参与度很高。

主题

单纯热性惊厥、复杂性热性惊厥、发热伴惊厥、脑膜炎、腰椎穿刺、癫痫持续状态。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be51/10334448/6f968e43c8c8/jetem-5-4-t45f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验