Nanda Rachita, Gupta Prishni, Giri Anjan Kumar, Patel Suprava, Shah Seema, Mohapatra Eli
Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Raipur, IND.
Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Raipur, IND.
Cureus. 2023 Jun 16;15(6):e40543. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40543. eCollection 2023 Jun.
Background The evaluation of the effectiveness of the vaccines (ChAdOx1-nCOV; Covishield and BBV-152; Covaxin) against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is necessary to assess their efficacy. Because most antibodies that neutralize the coronavirus are directed against the receptor binding domain within the spike protein of the virus, these antibodies serve as markers for viral neutralizers and, in turn, for vaccine response. The present study aimed to evaluate the anti-neutralizing antibody (receptor binding domain (RBD)) and immunoglobulin G2 (IgG2) titers following the completion of the vaccination schedule (both vaccines) against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Methodology In this longitudinal prospective study, conducted in a tertiary care center, 30 sequentially (two doses) vaccinated study participants between the ages of 18 and 44 years were sampled for estimation of anti-RBD antibody titer and IgG2. All statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 20 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). P-values less than 0.05 were considered significant. Results There was a statistically significant increase in the neutralizing antibody titer after one month of the second dose (z = -4.597, p < 0.001), while a significant decrease was seen in the IgG2 levels (z = -3.075, p = 0.002). The results showed a significant neutralizing effect of the vaccines being used, with Covishield being more effective than Covaxin. The levels of neutralizing antibodies were independent of all demographic variables such as age, sex, and body mass index. Conclusions This study evaluating the efficacy of the two vaccines, namely, Covishield and Covaxin, is the first of its kind in the state of Chhattisgarh. The results of this study are similar to previous studies conducted in India and outside India, concluding that Covishield is a more effective vaccine.
评估疫苗(ChAdOx1-nCOV;Covishield和BBV-152;Covaxin)对2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的有效性对于评估其疗效至关重要。由于大多数中和冠状病毒的抗体是针对病毒刺突蛋白内的受体结合域,这些抗体可作为病毒中和剂的标志物,进而作为疫苗反应的标志物。本研究旨在评估针对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的疫苗接种计划(两种疫苗)完成后抗中和抗体(受体结合域(RBD))和免疫球蛋白G2(IgG2)滴度。
在一家三级护理中心进行的这项纵向前瞻性研究中,对30名年龄在18至44岁之间按顺序(两剂)接种疫苗的研究参与者进行采样,以估计抗RBD抗体滴度和IgG2。所有统计分析均使用SPSS 20版(美国纽约州阿蒙克市IBM公司)进行。P值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
第二剂接种后一个月,中和抗体滴度有统计学显著升高(z = -4.597,p < 0.001),而IgG2水平有显著下降(z = -3.075,p = 0.002)。结果显示所用疫苗具有显著的中和作用,Covishield比Covaxin更有效。中和抗体水平与所有人口统计学变量如年龄、性别和体重指数无关。
本研究评估了两种疫苗Covishield和Covaxin的疗效,这在恰蒂斯加尔邦尚属首次。本研究结果与印度国内外先前的研究相似,得出Covishield是一种更有效疫苗的结论。