Department of Public Mental Health, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Behav Res Ther. 2023 Sep;168:104367. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2023.104367. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
Compassion-focused interventions represent a promising transdiagnostic approach, but the mechanisms involved in hybrid delivery combining face-to-face sessions and an ecological momentary intervention remain unexplored. The current study aimed at exploring associations of putative mechanisms with clinical outcomes at post-intervention/follow-up and mediation of outcome at follow-up by preceding pre-to post-intervention changes in putative mechanisms. The compassion-focused EMIcompass intervention was applied in an exploratory randomized controlled trial (treatment as usual (TAU) vs. TAU + EMIcompass) with youth with early mental health problems. Data was collected before randomization, at post-intervention and at four-week follow-up. We recruited N = 92 participants, N = 46 were allocated to the experimental condition. After control for baseline levels of the target outcomes, baseline-to post-intervention improvement in adaptive emotion regulation was associated with lower levels of clinical outcomes (e.g. psychological distress b = -1.15; 95%CI = -1.92 to -0.39) across time points. We could not detect indirect effects, but we observed associations of change in self-compassion and adaptive emotion regulation with outcomes at follow-up in the mediation analysis (e.g., β = -0.35, 95%CI = -0.52 to -0.16). If successfully targeted by interventions, self-compassion and emotion regulation may be promising putative therapeutic mechanisms of change.
以慈悲为怀为重点的干预措施代表了一种有前途的跨诊断方法,但将面对面会议和生态瞬间干预相结合的混合交付方式所涉及的机制仍未得到探索。本研究旨在探讨假设机制与干预后/随访时临床结果的关联,并通过假设机制在干预前到干预后的变化对随访时的结果进行中介分析。慈悲为怀的 EMIcompass 干预措施在一项针对早期心理健康问题青年的探索性随机对照试验(常规治疗(TAU)与 TAU + EMIcompass)中应用。数据在随机分组前、干预后和四周随访时收集。我们招募了 N = 92 名参与者,N = 46 名被分配到实验组。在控制目标结果的基线水平后,适应性情绪调节的基线到干预后的改善与较低的临床结果水平相关(例如,心理困扰 b = -1.15;95%CI = -1.92 至 -0.39)。我们无法检测到间接影响,但在中介分析中观察到自我同情和适应性情绪调节的变化与随访时的结果相关(例如,β = -0.35,95%CI = -0.52 至 -0.16)。如果干预措施能够成功针对这些因素,自我同情和情绪调节可能是有前途的潜在治疗变化机制。