Machine learning models predict liver steatosis but not liver fibrosis in a prospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION

Screening for liver fibrosis continues to rely on laboratory panels and non-invasive tests such as FIB-4-score and transient elastography. In this study, we evaluated the potential of machine learning (ML) methods to predict liver steatosis on abdominal ultrasound and liver fibrosis, namely the intermediate-high risk of advanced fibrosis, in individuals participating in a screening program for colorectal cancer.

METHODS

We performed ultrasound on 5834 patients admitted between 2006 and 2020, and transient elastography on a subset of 1240 patients. Steatosis on ultrasound was diagnosed if liver areas showed a significantly increased echogenicity compared to the renal parenchyma. Liver fibrosis was defined as a liver stiffness measurement ≥8 kPa in transient elastography. We evaluated the performance of three algorithms, namely Extreme Gradient Boosting, Feed-Forward neural network and Logistic Regression, deriving the models using data from patients admitted from January 2007 up to January 2016 and prospectively evaluating on the data of patients admitted from January 2016 up to March 2020. We also performed a performance comparison with the standard clinical test based on Fibrosis-4 Index (FIB-4).

RESULTS

The mean age was 58±9 years with 3036 males (52%). Modelling laboratory parameters, clinical parameters, and data on eight food types/dietary patterns, we achieved high performance in predicting liver steatosis on ultrasound with AUC of 0.87 (95% CI [0.87-0.87]), and moderate performance in predicting liver fibrosis with AUC of 0.75 (95% CI [0.74-0.75]) using XGBoost machine learning algorithm. Patient-reported variables did not significantly improve predictive performance. Gender-specific analyses showed significantly higher performance in males with AUC of 0.74 (95% CI [0.73-0.74]) in comparison to female patients with AUC of 0.66 (95% CI [0.65-0.66]) in prediction of liver fibrosis. This difference was significantly smaller in prediction of steatosis with AUC of 0.85 (95% CI [0.83-0.87]) in female patients, in comparison to male patients with AUC of 0.82 (95% CI [0.80-0.84]).

CONCLUSION

ML based on point-prevalence laboratory and clinical information predicts liver steatosis with high accuracy and liver fibrosis with moderate accuracy. The observed gender differences suggest the need to develop gender-specific models.