Ichioka Yuki, Virto Leire, Nuevo Paula, Gamonal Juan Daniel, Derks Jan, Larsson Lena, Sanz Mariano, Berglundh Tord
Department of Periodontology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
ETEP (Etiology and Therapy of Periodontal and Peri-implant Diseases) Research Group, Faculty of Dentistry, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023 Oct;34(10):1058-1072. doi: 10.1111/clr.14136. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the cleaning efficacy of two mechanical and two chemical protocols in the decontamination of implant surfaces.
In total, 123 commercially available implants were mounted in plastic models mimicking peri-implant circumferential intra-bony defects. A multispecies biofilm was grown on implant surfaces. Mechanical (air-polishing (AP), rotating titanium brush (TiB)) and chemical decontamination (alkaline electrolyzed water, N-acetyl-L-cysteine) protocols were used. Cleaning efficacy in terms of residual biofilm area, chemical surface properties, and bacterial counts were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
Surface decontamination protocols including use of an AP device or a rotating TiB were superior in terms of biofilm removal and in reducing atomic% of Carbon on implant surfaces when compared to methods restricted to wiping with gauze. The use of chemical agents as adjuncts to the mechanical cleaning protocols provided no relevant overall benefit over saline. No treatment modality, however, resulted in complete biofilm removal.
Air-polishing and rotating TiB were more effective implant surface decontamination protocols than wiping with gauzes. Use of chemical agents did not improve cleaning efficacy.
本研究旨在评估两种机械方法和两种化学方法对种植体表面进行去污处理的清洁效果。
总共123颗市售种植体被安装在模拟种植体周围环形骨内缺损的塑料模型中。在种植体表面形成多物种生物膜。采用机械方法(空气抛光(AP)、旋转钛刷(TiB))和化学去污方法(碱性电解水、N-乙酰-L-半胱氨酸)。通过扫描电子显微镜、能量色散X射线光谱和定量聚合酶链反应分析残留生物膜面积、化学表面性质和细菌计数方面的清洁效果。
与仅用纱布擦拭的方法相比,包括使用AP装置或旋转TiB的表面去污方法在生物膜去除以及降低种植体表面碳的原子百分比方面更具优势。将化学试剂作为机械清洁方法的辅助手段,与使用生理盐水相比,并未带来显著的总体益处。然而,没有一种处理方式能完全去除生物膜。
空气抛光和旋转TiB在种植体表面去污方面比用纱布擦拭更有效。使用化学试剂并未提高清洁效果。