• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考察修正版 SART 在心流状态测量中的效果。

Examining the effects of a modified SART when measuring mind-wandering.

机构信息

Department of psychology, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Psychology and Behavior Research Center, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Brain Behav. 2023 Sep;13(9):e3175. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3175. Epub 2023 Jul 20.

DOI:10.1002/brb3.3175
PMID:37469329
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10498071/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Mind-wandering (MW) is defined as a shift of attention from external tasks toward internal thoughts and is popularly measured by the sustained attention to response task (SART). SART is able to capture MW, but cannot track the dynamics of mind-wandering over time well. We thus attempted to modify the sustained attention to response task paradigm (mSART) to capture the participant's mind-wandering state over time and quantify the degree of mind-wandering using the current behavioral data.

METHODS

179 participants from Wenzhou Medical University were recruited to participate in this experiment. The main changes to the experiment included (1) manipulating different no-go stimuli frequencies to control the difficulty of the task and setting 9 modes; (2) extending the experiment time to 30 min; (3) allowing participants to correct errors by pressing the b key. Error rate, Mean RTs, RT CV, and d' were used to reflect MW. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed.

RESULTS

ANOVA was used to explore Mean RTs, RT CV and d' for participants with different levels of mind-wandering and significant differences were found (Mean RTs:Welch's F (2, 8606.04) = 579.00, p < .001, η  = 0.03; RT CV:Welch's F (2, 198.11) = 69.93, p < .001, η  = 0.18; d':F (2, 176) = 19.88, p < .001, η  = 0.18). The 30-min experiment was divided into six time windows, and mind-wandering deepens over time.

CONCLUSIONS

The mSART paradigm could quantify the extent of MW based on changes in the frequency at which the no-go stimuli were presented and also revealed that the recommended length of the experiment was about 20 min.

摘要

目的

思维漫游(MW)被定义为注意力从外部任务转移到内部思维,通常通过持续注意反应任务(SART)来测量。SART 能够捕捉到 MW,但不能很好地跟踪随时间推移的思维漫游动态。因此,我们尝试修改持续注意反应任务范式(mSART),以随时间捕获参与者的思维漫游状态,并使用当前行为数据量化思维漫游的程度。

方法

从温州医科大学招募了 179 名参与者参加这项实验。实验的主要变化包括:(1)操纵不同的禁止刺激频率来控制任务的难度,并设置 9 种模式;(2)将实验时间延长至 30 分钟;(3)允许参与者通过按下 b 键来纠正错误。错误率、平均反应时(Mean RTs)、反应时变异系数(RT CV)和 d' 用于反映 MW。采用协方差分析(ANCOVA)进行分析。

结果

方差分析用于探索不同思维漫游水平的参与者的 Mean RTs、RT CV 和 d',发现有显著差异(Mean RTs:Welch 的 F(2,8606.04)= 579.00,p<0.001,η²=0.03;RT CV:Welch 的 F(2,198.11)= 69.93,p<0.001,η²=0.18;d':F(2,176)= 19.88,p<0.001,η²=0.18)。30 分钟的实验分为六个时间窗口,随着时间的推移,思维漫游逐渐加深。

结论

mSART 范式可以根据禁止刺激出现的频率变化来量化 MW 的程度,同时还揭示了实验的推荐时长约为 20 分钟。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07ad/10498071/b44c1cdb230f/BRB3-13-e3175-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07ad/10498071/e8d0f521dfa3/BRB3-13-e3175-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07ad/10498071/c943e42976d6/BRB3-13-e3175-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07ad/10498071/8749d5a87b4f/BRB3-13-e3175-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07ad/10498071/b44c1cdb230f/BRB3-13-e3175-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07ad/10498071/e8d0f521dfa3/BRB3-13-e3175-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07ad/10498071/c943e42976d6/BRB3-13-e3175-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07ad/10498071/8749d5a87b4f/BRB3-13-e3175-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07ad/10498071/b44c1cdb230f/BRB3-13-e3175-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Examining the effects of a modified SART when measuring mind-wandering.考察修正版 SART 在心流状态测量中的效果。
Brain Behav. 2023 Sep;13(9):e3175. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3175. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
2
The Neural Markers of Self-Caught and Probe-Caught Mind Wandering: An ERP Study.自我捕捉和探测捕捉到的思维游荡的神经标记:一项ERP研究。
Brain Sci. 2021 Oct 8;11(10):1329. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11101329.
3
The influence of thought probes on performance: Does the mind wander more if you ask it?思维探针对表现的影响:如果让你思考,你的思维会更漫游吗?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Feb;26(1):367-373. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1529-3.
4
Detecting inattentiveness caused by mind-wandering during a driving task: A behavioral study.检测驾驶任务中因思维漫游导致的注意力不集中:一项行为研究。
Appl Ergon. 2023 Jan;106:103892. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103892. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
5
Mind wandering simultaneously prolongs reactions and promotes creative incubation.走神既延长了反应时间,又促进了创造性酝酿。
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 31;7(1):10197. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10616-3.
6
Relationships between mind-wandering and attentional control abilities in young adults and adolescents.青年人和青少年的走神与注意力控制能力之间的关系。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 May;148:25-36. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.01.007. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
7
Vigilance decrement and mind-wandering in sustained attention tasks: Two sides of the same coin?持续注意力任务中的警觉性下降与走神:同一枚硬币的两面?
Front Neurosci. 2023 Mar 28;17:1122406. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1122406. eCollection 2023.
8
Children with positive attitudes towards mind-wandering provide invalid subjective reports of mind-wandering during an experimental task.对走神持积极态度的儿童在实验任务中对走神给出了无效的主观报告。
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Sep;35:136-42. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.05.006. Epub 2015 May 25.
9
Propensity to intentional and unintentional mind-wandering differs in arousal and executive vigilance tasks.在唤醒和执行警觉任务中,有意和无意的思维漫游倾向存在差异。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 19;16(10):e0258734. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258734. eCollection 2021.
10
Modulation of Mind Wandering Using Monaural Beat Stimulation in Subjects With High Trait-Level Mind Wandering.使用单耳节拍刺激对高特质水平思维游荡受试者的思维游荡进行调节。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 13;13:815442. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815442. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
The Relative Accuracy of Different Methods for Measuring Mind Wandering Subtypes: A Systematic Review.测量思维游荡亚型的不同方法的相对准确性:一项系统综述。
Brain Behav. 2025 Aug;15(8):e70764. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70764.
2
Lactate dehydrogenase to albumin ratio and poor prognosis after thrombolysis in ischemic stroke patients: developing a novel nomogram.缺血性中风患者溶栓后乳酸脱氢酶与白蛋白比值及预后不良:构建新型列线图
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Apr 15;25(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02991-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Go-stimuli probability influences response bias in the sustained attention to response task: a signal detection theory perspective.Go 刺激概率影响反应任务中的反应偏差:信号检测理论视角。
Psychol Res. 2023 Mar;87(2):509-518. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01679-7. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
2
Propensity to intentional and unintentional mind-wandering differs in arousal and executive vigilance tasks.在唤醒和执行警觉任务中,有意和无意的思维漫游倾向存在差异。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 19;16(10):e0258734. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258734. eCollection 2021.
3
The dynamic framework of mind wandering revisited: How mindful meta-awareness affects mental states' constraints.
再探心智游移的动态框架:正念元意识如何影响心理状态的约束。
Conscious Cogn. 2021 Oct;95:103194. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2021.103194. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
4
Mind-Wandering Changes in Dysphoria.烦躁情绪中的心不在焉变化
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 11;11:544999. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.544999. eCollection 2020.
5
Drowsiness or mind-wandering? Fluctuations in ocular parameters during attentional lapses.困倦还是心不在焉?注意力不集中时眼部参数的波动。
Biol Psychol. 2020 Oct;156:107950. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107950. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
6
Mind wandering in creative problem-solving: Relationships with divergent thinking and mental health.创意解决问题时的思维漫游:与发散思维和心理健康的关系。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 23;15(4):e0231946. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231946. eCollection 2020.
7
Neuroimaging the consciousness of self: Review, and conceptual-methodological framework.神经影像学对自我意识的研究:综述与概念-方法论框架。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 May;112:164-212. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.01.023. Epub 2020 Jan 26.
8
Mind Wandering (Internal Distractibility) in ADHD: A Literature Review.ADHD 中的思维漫游(内部分心):文献综述。
J Atten Disord. 2021 Apr;25(6):885-890. doi: 10.1177/1087054719865781. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
9
Measuring task set preparation versus mind wandering using pupillometry.使用瞳孔测量法测量任务集准备与思维漫游。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Feb;46(2):280-295. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000720. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
10
Modeling distracted performance.建模注意力分散的表现。
Cogn Psychol. 2019 Aug;112:48-80. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 May 23.