Valizadeh-Haghi Haleh, Valizadeh-Haghi Safa, Naslseraji Nasim, Zandian Hamed
Department of Operative Dentistry, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran.
Department of Operative Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Int J Dent. 2023 Jul 11;2023:3171140. doi: 10.1155/2023/3171140. eCollection 2023.
Today, teledentistry have gain more attention than past due to the advances in technology. The aim of this study was to compare the use of smartphone photography as a method in teledentistry with the face-to-face examination in the evaluation of anterior composite restorations.
In this study, photographs of 24 composite restorations in patients attended to the clinic of Ardabil Dental School were obtained using a smartphone without any additional equipment and sent by email to 10 remote observers. As a gold standard method, these restorations were evaluated by an experienced expert in restorative dentistry a face-to-face examination. In both methods FDI criteria were used to evaluate the restorations and classified them as acceptable or not. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and diagnostic accuracy of the photographic method relative to face-to-face method were calculated. Furthermore the Mann-Whitney test was used to statistically compare the two methods in detail.
The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the smartphone photography method was 69.35%, 48.72%, 87.34%, and 23.75%, respectively. A diagnostic accuracy of 65.97% was obtained. Statistically, in overall the photographic method rated the restorations as better than they were in reality (face-to-face examination) ( = 0.002).
The diagnostic accuracy of the method of evaluating anterior composite restorations by smartphone photography was moderate and the use of this method in teledentistry, although was promising, needs to be improved.
如今,由于技术进步,远程牙科比以往更受关注。本研究的目的是比较在评估前牙复合树脂修复体时,使用智能手机摄影作为远程牙科方法与面对面检查的效果。
在本研究中,使用智能手机在没有任何额外设备的情况下,获取了阿尔达比勒牙科学院诊所24例复合树脂修复体患者的照片,并通过电子邮件发送给10名远程观察者。作为金标准方法,这些修复体由修复牙科领域的一位经验丰富的专家进行面对面检查评估。在两种方法中,均使用FDI标准评估修复体,并将其分类为可接受或不可接受。计算摄影方法相对于面对面方法的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值以及诊断准确性。此外,使用曼-惠特尼检验对两种方法进行详细的统计学比较。
智能手机摄影方法的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为69.35%、48.72%、87.34%和23.75%。诊断准确性为65.97%。从统计学角度来看,总体上摄影方法对修复体的评价比实际情况(面对面检查)更好(P = 0.002)。
通过智能手机摄影评估前牙复合树脂修复体的方法诊断准确性中等,该方法在远程牙科中的应用虽然有前景,但仍需改进。