Moreno C, Moore E E, Majure J A, Hopeman A R
J Trauma. 1986 Sep;26(9):821-5. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198609000-00007.
Previous studies have emphasized injury mechanism, wound site, and presenting vital signs as critical determinants for survival following penetrating cardiac injury. Our experience suggests pericardial tamponade is another crucial factor and is the basis for this study. Prognostic features were reviewed in 100 consecutive, unselected patients with acute cardiac injuries. Mechanism was stab wound in 57, and gunshot injury in 43. Location included right ventricle in 55, left ventricle in 49, right atrium in 16, and left atrium in seven. Overall salvage was 31%,; 27 (47%) of 57 stab wounds, four (9%) of 43 gunshot wounds, 22 (49%) of 45 right, and nine (23%) of 39 left heart wounds. The presence or absence of pericardial tamponade was documented in 77 patients. Patients with tamponade had a survival of 73% (24/33) compared to 11% (5/44) in those without its protective effect. The presence of tamponade improved survival (p less than 0.05) following stab injuries (77% vs. 29%), gunshot wounds (57% vs. none), right heart wounds (79% vs. 28%), left heart injuries (71% vs. 12%), and overall in patients arriving with vital signs (96% vs. 50%). Multivariant discriminant analysis by logistic regression demonstrated cardiac tamponade was a critical independent factor in patient survival, and suggested that it may be more influential than presenting vital signs in determining outcome.
既往研究强调损伤机制、伤口部位及呈现的生命体征是穿透性心脏损伤后生存的关键决定因素。我们的经验表明心包填塞是另一个关键因素,也是本研究的基础。对100例连续入选的急性心脏损伤患者的预后特征进行了回顾。损伤机制为刺伤57例,枪伤43例。损伤部位包括右心室55例,左心室49例,右心房16例,左心房7例。总体挽救率为31%;57例刺伤中有27例(47%),43例枪伤中有4例(9%),45例右心损伤中有22例(49%),39例左心损伤中有9例(23%)。77例患者记录了有无心包填塞情况。有心包填塞的患者生存率为73%(24/33),而没有其保护作用的患者生存率为11%(5/44)。心包填塞的存在改善了刺伤(77%对29%)、枪伤(57%对无)、右心损伤(79%对28%)、左心损伤(71%对12%)后以及总体有生命体征患者(96%对50%)的生存率。通过逻辑回归进行的多变量判别分析表明心包填塞是患者生存的关键独立因素,并提示在决定预后方面它可能比呈现的生命体征更具影响力。