• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关注隐私:基于视频的 AAL 的接受程度受到被拍摄活动的影响。

Eyes on privacy: acceptance of video-based AAL impacted by activities being filmed.

机构信息

Human-Computer Interaction Center, Chair of Communication Science, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 4;11:1186944. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1186944. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1186944
PMID:37469701
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10352951/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The use of video-based ambient assisted living (AAL) technologies represents an innovative approach to supporting older adults living as independently and autonomously as possible in their homes. These visual devices have the potential to increase security, perceived safety, and relief for families and caregivers by detecting, among others, emergencies or serious health situations. Despite these potentials and advantages, using video-based technologies for monitoring different activities in everyday life evokes concerns about privacy intrusion and data security. For a sustainable design and adoption of such technical innovations, a detailed analysis of future users' acceptance, including perceived benefits and barriers is required and possible effects and privacy needs of different activities being filmed should be taken into account.

METHODS

Therefore, the present study investigated the acceptance and benefit-barrier-perception of using video-based AAL technologies for different activities of daily living based on a scenario-based online survey ( = 146).

RESULTS

In the first step, the results identified distinct evaluation patterns for 25 activities of daily living with very high (e.g., changing clothes, showering) and very low privacy needs (e.g., gardening, eating, and drinking). In a second step, three exemplary activity types were compared regarding acceptance, perceived benefits, and barriers. The acceptance and the perceived benefits of using video-based AAL technologies revealed to be higher in household and social activities compared to intimate activities. The strongest barrier perception was found for intimate activities and mainly regarded privacy concerns.

DISCUSSION

The results can be used to derive design and information recommendations for the conception, development, and communication of video-based AAL technologies in order to meet the requirements and needs of future users.

摘要

简介

视频环境辅助生活(AAL)技术的使用代表了一种支持老年人尽可能独立和自主地在家中生活的创新方法。这些视觉设备有可能通过检测紧急情况或严重的健康状况等来增加安全性、感知安全性和减轻家庭和护理人员的负担。尽管存在这些潜力和优势,但使用基于视频的技术来监测日常生活中的不同活动会引发对隐私侵犯和数据安全的担忧。为了可持续设计和采用此类技术创新,需要详细分析未来用户的接受程度,包括感知到的益处和障碍,以及应考虑不同拍摄活动的可能影响和隐私需求。

方法

因此,本研究基于基于情景的在线调查(n = 146),调查了使用基于视频的 AAL 技术进行不同日常生活活动的接受程度和益处-障碍感知。

结果

在第一步中,结果确定了 25 种日常生活活动的不同评估模式,这些活动具有非常高的隐私需求(例如,换衣服、洗澡)和非常低的隐私需求(例如,园艺、饮食和饮水)。在第二步中,比较了三种典型的活动类型,涉及接受度、感知益处和障碍。与亲密活动相比,使用基于视频的 AAL 技术的接受度和感知益处更高,出现在家庭和社会活动中。最强烈的障碍感知是针对亲密活动的,主要涉及隐私问题。

讨论

研究结果可用于为基于视频的 AAL 技术的构思、开发和传播提供设计和信息建议,以满足未来用户的要求和需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b68/10352951/0406ed10ef75/fpubh-11-1186944-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b68/10352951/81bd046d7425/fpubh-11-1186944-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b68/10352951/cc55095ccb7a/fpubh-11-1186944-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b68/10352951/b082c92a184e/fpubh-11-1186944-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b68/10352951/158c9b5a34d2/fpubh-11-1186944-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b68/10352951/eda9f3b6cea7/fpubh-11-1186944-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b68/10352951/0406ed10ef75/fpubh-11-1186944-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b68/10352951/81bd046d7425/fpubh-11-1186944-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b68/10352951/cc55095ccb7a/fpubh-11-1186944-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b68/10352951/b082c92a184e/fpubh-11-1186944-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b68/10352951/158c9b5a34d2/fpubh-11-1186944-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b68/10352951/eda9f3b6cea7/fpubh-11-1186944-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b68/10352951/0406ed10ef75/fpubh-11-1186944-g0006.jpg

相似文献

1
Eyes on privacy: acceptance of video-based AAL impacted by activities being filmed.关注隐私:基于视频的 AAL 的接受程度受到被拍摄活动的影响。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 4;11:1186944. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1186944. eCollection 2023.
2
Shapes of You? Investigating the Acceptance of Video-Based AAL Technologies Applying Different Visualization Modes.你的形状?研究不同可视化模式的基于视频的 AAL 技术的接受度。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jan 19;23(3):1143. doi: 10.3390/s23031143.
3
Acceptance and Privacy Perceptions Toward Video-based Active and Assisted Living Technologies: Scoping Review.接受度和隐私感知视角下的基于视频的主动和辅助生活技术:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 1;25:e45297. doi: 10.2196/45297.
4
Analyzing technology acceptance and perception of privacy in ambient assisted living for using sensor-based technologies.分析基于传感器技术的安闲辅助生活中对技术接受和隐私感知。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 5;17(7):e0269642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269642. eCollection 2022.
5
They Don't Care About Us! Care Personnel's Perspectives on Ambient Assisted Living Technology Usage: Scenario-Based Survey Study.他们不在乎我们!护理人员对环境辅助生活技术使用的看法:基于情景的调查研究。
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018 Sep 24;5(2):e10424. doi: 10.2196/10424.
6
Ambient Assisted Living: Scoping Review of Artificial Intelligence Models, Domains, Technology, and Concerns.环境辅助生活:人工智能模型、领域、技术和关注点的范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 4;24(11):e36553. doi: 10.2196/36553.
7
Nothing Else Matters! Trade-Offs Between Perceived Benefits and Barriers of AAL Technology Usage.别无他事!辅助生活技术使用的感知收益与障碍之间的权衡。
Front Public Health. 2019 Jun 12;7:134. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00134. eCollection 2019.
8
Bare necessities? How the need for care modulates the acceptance of ambient assisted living technologies.基本需求?关怀需求如何调节对环境辅助生活技术的接受程度。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Jul;127:147-156. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.04.025. Epub 2019 May 4.
9
Delivering Digital Healthcare for Elderly: A Holistic Framework for the Adoption of Ambient Assisted Living.为老年人提供数字医疗保健:采用环境辅助生活的整体框架。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 14;19(24):16760. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416760.
10
What Characterizes Safety of Ambient Assisted Living Technologies?环境辅助生活技术的安全性有哪些特点?
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 May 27;281:704-708. doi: 10.3233/SHTI210263.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Older Adults' Perspectives on Digital Home Care Interventions and Home Modifications: Focus Group Study.探索老年人对数字家庭护理干预和家庭改造的看法:焦点小组研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Dec 13;8:e52834. doi: 10.2196/52834.

本文引用的文献

1
Shapes of You? Investigating the Acceptance of Video-Based AAL Technologies Applying Different Visualization Modes.你的形状?研究不同可视化模式的基于视频的 AAL 技术的接受度。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jan 19;23(3):1143. doi: 10.3390/s23031143.
2
Insights Into the Older Adults' World: Concepts of Aging, Care, and Using Assistive Technology in Late Adulthood.洞察老年人的世界:老年期的衰老、护理及辅助技术应用概念
Front Public Health. 2021 Jul 2;9:653931. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.653931. eCollection 2021.
3
Implementation of welfare technology: a systematic review of barriers and facilitators.
福利技术的实施:障碍与促进因素的系统评价
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021 Jun 15:1-16. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2021.1938707.
4
Acceptance of Technologies for Aging in Place: A Conceptual Model.接受技术以实现原地老龄化:一个概念模型。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 31;23(3):e22613. doi: 10.2196/22613.
5
Nothing Else Matters! Trade-Offs Between Perceived Benefits and Barriers of AAL Technology Usage.别无他事!辅助生活技术使用的感知收益与障碍之间的权衡。
Front Public Health. 2019 Jun 12;7:134. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00134. eCollection 2019.
6
Bare necessities? How the need for care modulates the acceptance of ambient assisted living technologies.基本需求?关怀需求如何调节对环境辅助生活技术的接受程度。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Jul;127:147-156. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.04.025. Epub 2019 May 4.
7
Older people, assistive technologies, and the barriers to adoption: A systematic review.老年人、辅助技术与采用障碍:一项系统综述
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Oct;94:112-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
8
SmartSenior@home: Acceptance of an integrated ambient assisted living system. Results of a clinical field trial in 35 households.智能居家养老:对集成式环境辅助生活系统的接受度。35户家庭的临床现场试验结果。
Inform Health Soc Care. 2016 Dec;41(4):430-47. doi: 10.3109/17538157.2015.1064425. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
9
Recognition of Activities of Daily Living with Egocentric Vision: A Review.基于自我中心视觉的日常生活活动识别:综述
Sensors (Basel). 2016 Jan 7;16(1):72. doi: 10.3390/s16010072.
10
No Place Like Home? Surveillance and What Home Means in Old Age.无处可归?老年时期的监视与家的意义
Can J Aging. 2016 Mar;35(1):103-14. doi: 10.1017/S0714980815000549. Epub 2016 Jan 8.