• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Evaluating medical tests: introducing the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy.

作者信息

Bossuyt Patrick M, Deeks Jonathan J, Leeflang Mariska M, Takwoingi Yemisi, Flemyng Ella

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 20;7(7):ED000163. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000163.

DOI:10.1002/14651858.ED000163
PMID:37470764
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10408284/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Evaluating medical tests: introducing the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy.评估医学检验：介绍《Cochrane诊断试验准确性系统评价手册》
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 20;7(7):ED000163. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000163.
2
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA).系统评价诊断准确性研究报告的改进步骤：诊断准确性系统评价和 Meta 分析的首选报告项目（PRISMA-DTA）。
Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 11;8(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1090-9.
3
Data Extraction and Synthesis in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy: A Corpus for Automating and Evaluating the Process.诊断试验准确性系统评价中的数据提取与合成：一个用于自动化和评估该过程的语料库
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Dec 5;2018:817-826. eCollection 2018.
4
Measuring quality of reporting in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies in medical imaging: comparison of PRISMA-DTA and PRISMA.医学影像诊断试验准确性研究系统评价中报告质量的衡量：PRISMA-DTA与PRISMA的比较
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Feb;61(2):257-266. doi: 10.1002/uog.26043. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
5
High and unclear risk of bias assessments are predominant in diagnostic accuracy studies included in Cochrane reviews.在 Cochrane 综述中纳入的诊断准确性研究中，高风险和不明确偏倚评估占主导地位。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Sep;101:73-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.05.001. Epub 2018 May 16.
6
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy: The PRISMA-DTA Statement.诊断试验准确性的系统评价和Meta分析：PRISMA-DTA声明。
Radiology. 2018 Nov;289(2):313-314. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018180850. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
7
Diagnostic test accuracy of novel biomarkers for lupus nephritis-An overview of systematic reviews.新型狼疮肾炎生物标志物诊断准确性的系统评价概述。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 10;17(10):e0275016. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275016. eCollection 2022.
8
Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy in CMI.慢性医学病症中诊断试验准确性的系统评价。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Nov;24(11):1115-1116. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.05.022. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
9
[Systematic review of diagnostic tests accuracy: a narrative review].[诊断试验准确性的系统评价：一篇叙述性综述]
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2010 Apr;37(2):153-6. doi: 10.1590/s0100-69912010000200013.
10
Application of weighting methods for presenting risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies.在诊断试验准确性研究的系统评价中应用加权方法呈现偏倚风险评估
Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 27;10(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01744-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for dysphagia in neurological disorders including stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.超声对包括中风在内的神经系统疾病吞咽困难的诊断准确性：一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Neurol. 2025 Aug 21;16:1534173. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1534173. eCollection 2025.
2
Anti-TB treatment outcomes in TB meningitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.结核性脑膜炎的抗结核治疗结果：一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
New Microbes New Infect. 2025 Aug 21;67:101623. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2025.101623. eCollection 2025 Oct.
3
The efficacy of single-incision laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in the surgical management of ectopic pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.单孔腹腔镜手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗异位妊娠的疗效：一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Sep 5;22(3):275-286. doi: 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2025.02761. Epub 2025 Aug 28.
4
Machine-learning-based artificial intelligence tools for the diagnosis of tropical fevers: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol of diagnostic test accuracy.基于机器学习的热带发热诊断人工智能工具：诊断试验准确性的系统评价和荟萃分析方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 25;15(8):e102158. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102158.
5
Efficacy of integrative non-pharmacological traditional Chinese medicine approaches in enhancing gastrointestinal function and quality of life in patients undergoing chemotherapy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.中西医结合非药物疗法对化疗患者胃肠功能及生活质量的改善作用：一项系统评价与网状Meta分析
Discov Oncol. 2025 Aug 25;16(1):1610. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-03409-y.
6
Evaluating liquid biopsy biomarkers for early detection of brain metastasis: A systematic review.评估用于脑转移早期检测的液体活检生物标志物：一项系统综述。
Neurooncol Pract. 2025 Mar 18;12(4):600-617. doi: 10.1093/nop/npaf032. eCollection 2025 Aug.
7
Enhanced Diagnostic Accuracy for Septic Arthritis Through Multivariate Analysis of Serum and Synovial Biomarkers.通过血清和滑膜生物标志物的多变量分析提高化脓性关节炎的诊断准确性
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 1;14(15):5415. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155415.
8
Extract with care: the imperative of rigor, transparency, and reproducibility in meta-analysis.谨慎提取：荟萃分析中严谨性、透明度和可重复性的必要性。
Transl Pediatr. 2025 Jul 31;14(7):1733-1736. doi: 10.21037/tp-2025-337. Epub 2025 Jul 11.
9
Efficacy and safety of exercise rehabilitation in the vulnerable phase in patients with acute decompensated heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.急性失代偿性心力衰竭患者脆弱期运动康复的疗效与安全性：一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Nurs Sci. 2025 Jun 16;12(4):408-414. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2025.06.006. eCollection 2025 Jul.
10
CT diagnostic performance for preoperative staging of colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.CT对结肠癌术前分期的诊断性能：一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Radiol. 2025 Aug 6. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11850-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3.
2
Xpert Ultra versus Xpert MTB/RIF for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults with presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis.Xpert Ultra 与 Xpert MTB/RIF 检测疑似肺结核成人肺结核和利福平耐药性的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 22;2:CD009593. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009593.pub5.
3
Visual inspection for diagnosing cutaneous melanoma in adults.成人皮肤黑色素瘤的视觉检查诊断
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 4;12(12):CD013194. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013194.
4
Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews.考科蓝诊断试验准确性综述。
Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 7;2:82. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-82.
5
The architecture of diagnostic research.诊断研究的架构
BMJ. 2002 Mar 2;324(7336):539-41. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7336.539.