• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考科蓝诊断试验准确性综述。

Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews.

作者信息

Leeflang Mariska M G, Deeks Jonathan J, Takwoingi Yemisi, Macaskill Petra

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 7;2:82. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-82.

DOI:10.1186/2046-4053-2-82
PMID:24099098
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3851548/
Abstract

In 1996, shortly after the founding of The Cochrane Collaboration, leading figures in test evaluation research established a Methods Group to focus on the relatively new and rapidly evolving methods for the systematic review of studies of diagnostic tests. Seven years later, the Collaboration decided it was time to develop a publication format and methodology for Diagnostic Test Accuracy (DTA) reviews, as well as the software needed to implement these reviews in The Cochrane Library. A meeting hosted by the German Cochrane Centre in 2004 brought together key methodologists in the area, many of whom became closely involved in the subsequent development of the methodological framework for DTA reviews. DTA reviews first appeared in The Cochrane Library in 2008 and are now an integral part of the work of the Collaboration.

摘要

1996年,在考克兰协作网成立后不久,测试评估研究领域的领军人物成立了一个方法学小组,专注于诊断性试验研究系统评价中相对较新且发展迅速的方法。七年后,协作网决定是时候开发一种用于诊断试验准确性(DTA)评价的出版格式和方法,以及在考克兰图书馆实施这些评价所需的软件。2004年由德国考克兰中心主办的一次会议汇聚了该领域的关键方法学家,他们中的许多人在随后DTA评价方法框架的开发中发挥了密切作用。DTA评价于2008年首次出现在考克兰图书馆,如今已成为协作网工作不可或缺的一部分。

相似文献

1
Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews.考科蓝诊断试验准确性综述。
Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 7;2:82. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-82.
2
Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE.在MEDLINE和EMBASE中识别诊断准确性研究的检索策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 11;2013(9):MR000022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000022.pub3.
3
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
4
Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases.研究结果的传播和发表:相关偏倚的更新综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Feb;14(8):iii, ix-xi, 1-193. doi: 10.3310/hta14080.
5
Clinician-targeted interventions to influence antibiotic prescribing behaviour for acute respiratory infections in primary care: an overview of systematic reviews.针对临床医生的干预措施对基层医疗中急性呼吸道感染抗生素处方行为的影响:系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 7;9(9):CD012252. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012252.pub2.
6
Behavioural interventions for smoking cessation: an overview and network meta-analysis.行为干预戒烟:综述和网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 4;1(1):CD013229. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013229.pub2.
7
[The Cochrane Collaboration and systematic literature reviews about the efficiency of a treatment].[考科蓝协作网与关于某种治疗方法有效性的系统文献综述]
Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg. 2007;69(5-6):335-50.
8
Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews.分娩期女性的疼痛管理:系统评价综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD009234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009234.pub2.
9
Physical activity and exercise for chronic pain in adults: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.成人慢性疼痛的体力活动与锻炼:Cochrane系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 14;1(1):CD011279. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011279.pub2.
10
Interventions to improve the use of systematic reviews in decision-making by health system managers, policy makers and clinicians.旨在改善卫生系统管理人员、政策制定者和临床医生在决策过程中对系统评价的使用情况的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD009401. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009401.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of standard auxiliary (contrast or elastography) endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration/biopsy in solid pancreatic lesions: A meta-analysis.标准辅助(对比或弹性成像)内镜超声引导下细针穿刺抽吸/活检在实性胰腺病变中的比较:一项荟萃分析。
World J Methodol. 2025 Sep 20;15(3):97415. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i3.97415.
2
Sensitivity and Specificity for Physical Examination Tests in Diagnosing Prearthritic Intra-Articular Hip Pathology Are Highly Variable: A Systematic Review.体格检查测试在诊断关节炎前期髋关节关节内病变中的敏感性和特异性差异很大:一项系统评价。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2025 Mar 13;7(3):101117. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101117. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review classifies sources of bias and variation in diagnostic test accuracy studies.系统评价对诊断性试验准确性研究中的偏倚和变异来源进行分类。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Oct;66(10):1093-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.05.014. Epub 2013 Aug 17.
2
Empirical evidence of the importance of comparative studies of diagnostic test accuracy.诊断试验准确性比较研究重要性的实证证据。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Apr 2;158(7):544-54. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-7-201304020-00006.
3
Assessing the value of diagnostic tests: a framework for designing and evaluating trials.
Preoperative risk assessment of invasive endometrial cancer using MRI-based radiomics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
基于MRI的放射组学对浸润性子宫内膜癌的术前风险评估:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 May 24. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-05005-8.
4
Diagnostic accuracy of real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection of in clinical samples: A systematic review and meta-analysis.实时聚合酶链反应检测临床样本中[具体检测物未给出]的诊断准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Afr J Lab Med. 2025 Apr 16;14(1):2522. doi: 10.4102/ajlm.v14i1.2522. eCollection 2025.
5
One in three adenomas could be missed by white-light colonoscopy - findings from a systematic review and meta-analysis.白光结肠镜检查可能会漏诊三分之一的腺瘤——一项系统评价和荟萃分析的结果
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Mar 13;25(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03679-4.
6
Evaluating Rabies Test Accuracy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human and Canine Diagnostic Methods.评估狂犬病检测准确性:对人类和犬类诊断方法的系统评价与荟萃分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Feb 8;15(4):412. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15040412.
7
The Prevalence of Autistic Traits in a Sample of Young Adults Referred to a Generalized Mental Health Outpatient Clinic.转诊至综合精神健康门诊的年轻成人样本中自闭症特质的患病率
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Oct 30;14(21):2418. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14212418.
8
Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Vertebral Bone Quality Score for Prediction of Cage Subsidence and Screw Loosening in Patients Undergoing Degenerative Lumbar Surgery: A Meta-analysis.基于磁共振成像的椎体骨质量评分预测退行性腰椎手术患者椎间融合器下沉和螺钉松动:一项荟萃分析
Neurospine. 2024 Sep;21(3):913-924. doi: 10.14245/ns.2448496.248. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
9
The American Society for Microbiology collaboration with the CDC Laboratory Medicine Best Practices initiative for evidence-based laboratory medicine.美国微生物学会与美国疾病控制与预防中心实验室医学最佳实践倡议合作开展循证实验室医学。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2024 Dec 10;37(4):e0006518. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00065-18. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
10
Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of serological tests for hepatitis delta virus diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.评估血清学检测诊断丁型肝炎病毒的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 9;14(1):18475. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69304-8.
评估诊断试验的价值:设计和评估试验的框架
BMJ. 2012 Feb 21;344:e686. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e686.
4
QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.QUADAS-2:用于诊断准确性研究质量评估的修订工具。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):529-36. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009.
5
Inclusion of methodological filters in searches for diagnostic test accuracy studies misses relevant studies.在检索诊断准确性研究的搜索中包含方法学过滤器会遗漏相关研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Jun;64(6):602-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.006. Epub 2010 Nov 13.
6
Multivariate random effects meta-analysis of diagnostic tests with multiple thresholds.多阈值诊断试验的多变量随机效应荟萃分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Nov 10;9:73. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-73.
7
An empirical comparison of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy showed hierarchical models are necessary.诊断准确性的Meta分析方法的实证比较表明,分层模型是必要的。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Nov;61(11):1095-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.09.013.
8
Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.诊断试验准确性的系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Dec 16;149(12):889-97. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-12-200812160-00008.
9
Galactomannan detection for invasive aspergillosis in immunocompromized patients.免疫功能低下患者侵袭性曲霉病的半乳甘露聚糖检测
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8(4):CD007394. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007394.
10
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies.诊断试验和策略的证据质量分级及推荐强度
BMJ. 2008 May 17;336(7653):1106-10. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39500.677199.AE.