• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Impact of sequential capacity building on emergency department organisational flow during COVID-19 pandemic: a quasi-experimental study in a low-resource, tertiary care centre.COVID-19 大流行期间,连续性能力建设对急诊科组织流程的影响:在资源匮乏的三级保健中心进行的准实验研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 20;13(7):e063413. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063413.
2
Effects of Emergency Care-related Health Policies during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Korea: a Quasi-Experimental Study.韩国 COVID-19 大流行期间的急救护理相关卫生政策效果:一项准实验研究。
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Apr 26;36(16):e121. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e121.
3
Impact of patient isolation on emergency department length of stay: A retrospective cohort study using the Registry for Emergency Care.患者隔离对急诊科住院时间的影响:使用急诊护理登记处的回顾性队列研究。
Emerg Med Australas. 2020 Dec;32(6):1034-1039. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13607. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
4
Management of patients brought in by ambulance to the emergency department: role of the Advanced Musculoskeletal Physiotherapist.由救护车送往急诊科的患者的管理:高级肌肉骨骼物理治疗师的作用。
Aust Health Rev. 2018 Jun;42(3):309-315. doi: 10.1071/AH16094.
5
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on emergency department length of stay and clinical outcomes of patients with severe pneumonia: A single-center observational study.COVID-19 大流行对重症肺炎患者急诊住院时间和临床结局的影响:一项单中心观察性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 23;101(38):e30633. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030633.
6
Developing an efficient scheduling template of a chemotherapy treatment unit: A case study.制定化疗治疗单元的高效排班模板:一项案例研究。
Australas Med J. 2011;4(10):575-88. doi: 10.4066/AMJ.2011.837. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
7
Identifying the effects of an upgraded 'fever clinic' on COVID-19 control and the workload of emergency department: retrospective study in a tertiary hospital in China.识别升级后的“发热门诊”对 COVID-19 控制和急诊科工作量的影响:中国一家三级医院的回顾性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 20;10(8):e039177. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039177.
8
The impact of COVID-19 on an Irish Emergency Department (ED): a cross-sectional study exploring the factors influencing ED utilisation prior to and during the pandemic from the patient perspective.《COVID-19 对爱尔兰急诊部的影响:一项从患者角度出发,在大流行前后探索影响急诊部利用因素的横断面研究》。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Nov 2;22(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00720-7.
9
Effect of Triage Nurse Initiated Radiography Using the Ottawa Ankle Rules on Emergency Department Length of Stay at a Tertiary Centre.分诊护士依据渥太华踝关节规则启动X光检查对三级医疗中心急诊科住院时间的影响。
CJEM. 2016 Mar;18(2):90-7. doi: 10.1017/cem.2015.67. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
10
Locked in and locked out: sequelae of a pandemic for distressed and vulnerable teenagers in Ireland : Post-COVID rise in psychiatry assessments of teenagers presenting to the emergency department out-of-hours at an adult Irish tertiary hospital.被锁定和被排斥:大流行对爱尔兰痛苦和脆弱青少年的后遗症:在爱尔兰一家成人三级医院的急诊科非工作时间就诊的青少年,在精神病学评估中,新冠疫情后呈上升趋势。
Ir J Med Sci. 2023 Jun;192(3):1419-1426. doi: 10.1007/s11845-022-03080-0. Epub 2022 Jun 23.

本文引用的文献

1
COVID-19 Pandemic Leads to Decrease in Emergency Department Wait Times.新冠疫情导致急诊科候诊时间缩短。
JAMA Health Forum. 2020 Sep 1;1(9):e201172. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2020.1172.
2
Global Financial Crisis, Smart Lockdown Strategies, and the COVID-19 Spillover Impacts: A Global Perspective Implications From Southeast Asia.全球金融危机、智能封锁策略与新冠疫情的溢出效应:从东南亚看全球视角的影响
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 3;12:643783. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.643783. eCollection 2021.
3
Economic impact of COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare facilities and systems: International perspectives.COVID-19 大流行对医疗保健设施和系统的经济影响:国际视角。
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2021 Oct;35(3):293-306. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2020.11.009. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
4
Disaster Preparedness Training for Emergency Medicine Residents Using a Tabletop Exercise.使用桌面演练对急诊医学住院医师进行灾难准备培训。
MedEdPORTAL. 2021 Mar 12;17:11119. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11119.
5
Review article: Emergency department crowding measures associations with quality of care: A systematic review.综述文章:急诊科拥挤措施与医疗质量的关系:系统评价。
Emerg Med Australas. 2021 Aug;33(4):592-600. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13743. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
6
US Clinicians' Experiences and Perspectives on Resource Limitation and Patient Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic.美国临床医生在 COVID-19 大流行期间资源限制和患者护理方面的经验和观点。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2027315. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.27315.
7
Emergency department crowding and hospital transformation during COVID-19, a retrospective, descriptive study of a university hospital in Stockholm, Sweden.新冠疫情期间急诊科拥挤状况和医院转型:瑞典斯德哥尔摩一所大学附属医院的回顾性描述性研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 Oct 28;28(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00799-6.
8
Surge activation by the emergency department for COVID-19.急诊科应对 COVID-19 的激增。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Oct;38(10):2130-2133. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.07.024. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
9
Emergency department operations in a large health system during COVID-19.新冠疫情期间大型医疗系统中的急诊科运作
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Mar;41:241-243. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.05.097. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
10
Impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on census, organization and activity of a large urban Emergency Department.新冠疫情对大型城市急诊科的普查、组织及活动的影响
Acta Biomed. 2020 May 11;91(2):45-49. doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i2.9565.

COVID-19 大流行期间,连续性能力建设对急诊科组织流程的影响:在资源匮乏的三级保健中心进行的准实验研究。

Impact of sequential capacity building on emergency department organisational flow during COVID-19 pandemic: a quasi-experimental study in a low-resource, tertiary care centre.

机构信息

Indus Hospital & Health Network, Karachi, Pakistan

Indus Hospital & Health Network, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 20;13(7):e063413. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063413.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063413
PMID:37474172
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10360418/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A quasi-experimental study was conducted to estimate the impact of sequential emergency department (ED) capacity building interventions on key performance indicators such as patients' length of stay (LOS) and wait time (WT) during the COVID-19 pandemic. This was achieved through augmenting personnel education and head count, space restructuring and workflow reorganisation.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

This study included 268 352 patients presenting from January 2019 to December 2020 at Indus Hospital and Health network Karachi, a philanthropic tertiary healthcare facility in a city of 20 million residents. A follow-up study was undertaken from January to December 2021 with 123 938 participants.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

These included mean and median ED-LOS and WT for participants presenting in different cohorts. The results of the pre-COVID-19 year 2019 (phase 0) were compared with that of the COVID-19 year, 2020 (phases 1-3 corresponding to peaks, and phase 4 corresponding to reduction in caseloads). The follow-up was conducted in 2021 to see the sustainability of the sequential capacity building.

RESULTS

Phases 1, 2 and 3 had a lower mean adjusted LOS (4.42, 3.92 and 4.40 hours) compared with phase 0 (4.78 hours, p<0.05) with the lowest numbers seen in phase 2. The same held true for WT with 45.1, 23.8 and 30.4 min in phases 1-3 compared with 49.9 in phase 0. However, phase 4 had a higher LOS but a lower WT when compared with phase 0 with a p<0.05.

CONCLUSION

Sequential capacity building and improving the operational flow through stage appropriate interventions can be used to off-load ED patients and improve process flow metrics. This shows that models created during COVID-19 can be used to develop sustainable solutions and investment is needed in ideas such as ED-based telehealth to improve patient satisfaction and outcomes.

摘要

介绍

本准实验研究旨在评估在 COVID-19 大流行期间,通过增加人员教育和人员配备、空间重构和工作流程重组等方式对急诊部(ED)容量建设干预措施对患者停留时间(LOS)和等待时间(WT)等关键绩效指标的影响。

设置和参与者

本研究包括 2020 年 1 月至 12 月在 Indus 医院和健康网络卡拉奇就诊的 268352 名患者,这是一个拥有 2000 万居民的城市中的慈善性三级医疗机构。2021 年 1 月至 12 月进行了后续研究,共纳入 123938 名参与者。

主要和次要结果

这些结果包括不同队列患者的 ED-LOS 和 WT 的平均值和中位数。将 2019 年(第 0 阶段)的 COVID-19 前年度结果与 2020 年的 COVID-19 年度结果(第 1-3 阶段对应高峰期,第 4 阶段对应病例数减少)进行比较。2021 年进行了随访,以观察连续容量建设的可持续性。

结果

与第 0 阶段(4.78 小时,p<0.05)相比,第 1、2 和 3 阶段的平均调整 LOS(4.42、3.92 和 4.40 小时)较低,其中第 2 阶段的数值最低。WT 也同样如此,第 1-3 阶段分别为 45.1、23.8 和 30.4 分钟,而第 0 阶段为 49.9 分钟。然而,与第 0 阶段相比,第 4 阶段的 LOS 较高,但 WT 较低,p<0.05。

结论

通过分阶段进行适当干预来进行连续容量建设和改善运营流程,可以用于减轻 ED 患者的负担并改善流程指标。这表明在 COVID-19 期间创建的模型可用于制定可持续的解决方案,需要投资 ED 基于远程医疗等想法,以提高患者满意度和结果。