Suppr超能文献

[微创股骨头置换术与股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗老年粉碎性股骨转子间骨折的临床疗效比较]

[Comparison of clinical effects of minimally invasive femoral head replacement and proximal femoral nail antirotation in the treatment of comminuted intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly].

作者信息

Wang Qiang, Leng Yan-Kui, Xia Bing

机构信息

Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Jinhua, Jinhua 321017, Zhejiang, China.

Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2023 Jul 25;36(7):641-6. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2023.07.009.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the clinical effect of minimally invasive femoral head replacement and proximal femoral nail antirotation(PFNA) internal fixation at the same time in the treatment of elderly patients with comminuted intertrochanteric fracture.

METHODS

From April 2020 to October 2020, 76 elderly patients with comminuted intertrochanteric fracture treated by minimally invasive femoral head replacement and PFNA were analyzed retrospectively. There were 35 patients in the prosthetic group, including 24 females and 11 males with an average age of (86.2±6.1) years old. There were 41 patients in PFNA group including 28 females and 13 males with an average age of (84.6±5.3) years old. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative ambulation time, hospitalization time and complications were observed and compared between two groups. Harris hip score was performed at 1, 6 and 12 months after operation.

RESULTS

All patients were followed up for 13 to 17 months with an average of (14.3±1.4) months. The operation time of the prosthesis group was longer than that of the PFNA group (<0.05);the amount of bleeding in PFNA group was less than that in prosthesis group (>0.05);the time of ambulation in prosthetic group was earlier than that in PFNA group(<0.05);the number of complications in the prosthesis group was less than that in the PFNA group(<0.05); the Harris score of prosthesis group was significantly higher than that of PFNA group at 1 and 6 months after operation (<0.05), but there was no significant difference in Harris score between two groups at 12 months after operation(>0.05);the number of complications in the prosthesis group was less than that in the PFNA group (<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive femoral head replacement is a good choice for the elderly patients with commuited intertrochanteric fracture. It can improve the quality of life and reduce the burden of family members and society.

摘要

目的

分析微创股骨头置换术与股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)内固定术同期治疗老年粉碎性股骨转子间骨折的临床效果。

方法

回顾性分析2020年4月至2020年10月采用微创股骨头置换术与PFNA治疗的76例老年粉碎性股骨转子间骨折患者。假体组35例,其中女性24例,男性11例,平均年龄(86.2±6.1)岁。PFNA组41例,其中女性28例,男性13例,平均年龄(84.6±5.3)岁。观察并比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后下床活动时间、住院时间及并发症发生情况。于术后1、6、12个月进行Harris髋关节评分。

结果

所有患者均随访13~17个月,平均(14.3±1.4)个月。假体组手术时间长于PFNA组(P<0.05);PFNA组出血量少于假体组(P>0.05);假体组下床活动时间早于PFNA组(P<0.05);假体组并发症发生率低于PFNA组(P<0.05);术后1、6个月假体组Harris评分显著高于PFNA组(P<0.05),但术后12个月两组Harris评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);假体组并发症发生率低于PFNA组(P<0.05)。

结论

微创股骨头置换术是老年粉碎性股骨转子间骨折患者的良好选择,可提高患者生活质量,减轻家庭及社会负担。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验