Oluwoye Oladunni, Nagendra Arundati, Kriegel Liat S, Anglin Deidre M, Santos Maria M, López Steven R
Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane 412 E. Spokane Falls Blvd, Spokane, WA, 99202, USA.
Center of Excellence in Psychosocial and Systemic Research, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 151 Merrimac Street, Floor 6, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
SSM Ment Health. 2023 Dec;3. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmmh.2023.100209. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
The implementation of coordinated specialty care in the U.S. over the past decade has led to the improvements of clinical and functional outcomes among individuals in the early stages of psychosis. While there have been advancements in the delivery of early intervention services for psychosis, it has almost exclusively focused on short-term change at the individual level. In light of these advancements, research has identified gaps in access to care and delivery of services that are driven by different levels of determinants and have the biggest impact on historically excluded groups (e.g., ethnoracial minoritized communities). Interventions or efforts that place an emphasis on community level (structural or sociocultural) factors and how they may influence pathways to care and through care, specifically for those who have been historically excluded, have largely been missing from the design, dissemination and implementation of early psychosis services. The present paper uses a structural violence framework to review current evidence related to pathways to care for early psychosis and the physical/built environment and conditions (e.g., urbanicity, residential instability) and formal and informal community resources. Suggestions on future directions are also provided, that focus on enriching communities and creating sustainable change that spans from pathways leading to care to 'recovery.' In all, this lays the groundwork for a proposed paradigm shift in research and practice that encompasses the need for an emphasis on structural competency and community-driven approaches.
在过去十年中,美国实施的协调专科护理改善了精神病早期患者的临床和功能预后。虽然在提供精神病早期干预服务方面取得了进展,但几乎完全集中在个体层面的短期变化上。鉴于这些进展,研究发现,在获得护理和提供服务方面存在差距,这些差距是由不同层面的决定因素驱动的,对历史上被排斥的群体(如少数族裔社区)影响最大。早期精神病服务的设计、传播和实施在很大程度上缺少强调社区层面(结构或社会文化)因素以及这些因素如何影响就医途径和整个治疗过程的干预措施或努力,尤其是针对那些历史上被排斥的人群。本文使用结构性暴力框架来回顾当前与早期精神病就医途径、物理/建成环境和条件(如城市化、居住不稳定)以及正式和非正式社区资源相关的证据。还提供了关于未来方向的建议,重点是丰富社区并创造可持续的变化,涵盖从就医途径到 “康复” 的各个方面。总之,这为研究和实践中提议的范式转变奠定了基础,该转变包括强调结构能力和社区驱动方法的必要性。