Suppr超能文献

评估一种新的临终关怀专用患者决策辅助工具。

Evaluation of a Novel Hospice-Specific Patient Decision Aid.

机构信息

Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.

Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Apr;41(4):414-423. doi: 10.1177/10499091231190776. Epub 2023 Jul 21.

Abstract

We tested a novel hospice-specific patient decision aid to determine whether the decision aid could improve hospice knowledge, opinions of hospice, and decision self-efficacy in making decisions about hospice. Two patient-level randomized studies were conducted using two different cohorts. Recruitment was completed from March 2019 through May 2020. Cohort #1 was recruited from an academic hospital and a safety-net hospital and Cohort #2 was recruited from community members. Participants were randomized to review a hospice-specific patient decision aid. The primary outcomes were change in hospice knowledge, hospice beliefs and attitudes, and decision self-efficacy Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to evaluate differences on the primary outcomes between baseline and 1-month. Participants were at least 65 years of age. A total of 266 participants enrolled (131 in Cohort #1 and 135 in Cohort #2). Participants were randomized to the intervention group (n = 156) or control group (n = 109). The sample was 74% (n = 197) female, 58% (n = 156) African American and mean age was 74.9. Improvements in hospice knowledge between baseline and 1-month were observed in both the intervention and the control groups with no differences between groups (.43 vs .275 points, = .823). There were no observed differences between groups on Hospice Beliefs and Attitudes scale (3.29 vs 3.08, = .076). In contrast, Decision Self-Efficacy improved in both groups and the effect of the intervention was significant (8.04 vs 2.90, = -.027). The intervention demonstrated significant improvements in decision self-efficacy but not in hospice knowledge or hospice beliefs and attitudes.

摘要

我们测试了一种新颖的临终关怀特定患者决策辅助工具,以确定该决策辅助工具是否能够提高临终关怀知识、对临终关怀的看法以及在做出临终关怀决策时的决策自我效能感。进行了两项基于患者水平的随机研究,使用了两个不同的队列。招募工作于 2019 年 3 月至 2020 年 5 月完成。队列 #1 是从一家学术医院和一家安全网医院招募的,队列 #2 是从社区成员中招募的。参与者被随机分配查看临终关怀特定的患者决策辅助工具。主要结局是临终关怀知识、临终关怀信念和态度以及决策自我效能感的变化。Wilcoxon 符号秩检验用于评估主要结局在基线和 1 个月时的差异。参与者年龄至少为 65 岁。共有 266 名参与者入组(队列 #1 中 131 名,队列 #2 中 135 名)。参与者被随机分配到干预组(n = 156)或对照组(n = 109)。样本中 74%(n = 197)为女性,58%(n = 156)为非裔美国人,平均年龄为 74.9 岁。在干预组和对照组中,在基线和 1 个月时,临终关怀知识均有改善,但两组之间无差异(.43 与.275 分, =.823)。两组在临终关怀信念和态度量表上无差异(3.29 与 3.08 分, =.076)。相比之下,决策自我效能感在两组中均有所提高,且干预的效果显著(8.04 与 2.90 分, = -.027)。干预在决策自我效能感方面显示出显著改善,但在临终关怀知识或临终关怀信念和态度方面没有改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1292/11083913/1fc804522718/nihms-1980658-f0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验