Suppr超能文献

[经颅外双功超声对脑功能不可逆丧失患者脑循环停止检测的前瞻性研究]

[Prospective investigation of extracranial duplex sonography for the detection of cerebral circulatory arrest in patients with irreversible loss of brain function].

作者信息

Lambeck Johann, Strecker Christoph, Niesen Wolf-Dirk, Bardutzky Jürgen

机构信息

Klinik für Neurologie und Neurophysiologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland.

Klinik für Neurologie und Neurophysiologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Breisacherstr. 64, 79106, Freiburg, Deutschland.

出版信息

Nervenarzt. 2023 Dec;94(12):1139-1147. doi: 10.1007/s00115-023-01521-4. Epub 2023 Jul 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A broader distribution of bedside color-coded duplex sonography (CCD) for detection of cerebral circulatory arrest (CCA) would be important to improve its use in the diagnosis of irreversible loss of brain function (ILBF-Dx).

QUESTION

Is extracranial compared to the commonly applied transcranial CCD of the brain-supplying vessels (ECCD vs. TCCD) equivalent for the detection of CCA in ILBF-Dx regarding specificity and sensitivity?

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Study period January 2019-June 2022, screening of 136 and inclusion of 114 patients with severe brain lesions > 24 h after onset of fixed and dilated pupils, apnea and completed ILBF-Dx. Exclusion of patients without brainstem areflexia and guideline-conform applicability of CCD. Complementary ECCD (and TCCD, if other method used for irreversibility detection).

RESULTS

Detection of ILBF (ILBF+) in 86.8% (99/114), no ILBF (ILBF-) in 13.2% (15/114). ECCD was fully feasible in all patients; findings matching CCA were found in 94/99 ILBF+ cases (ECCD+) and not in 5 patients (ECCD-). All 15 patients with ILBF- showed ECCD- findings. Thus, the specificity of ECCD was 1.0, and the sensitivity was 0.949. TCCD showed CCA in 56 patients (TCCD+), and ECCD+ was also found in all of them. An inconclusive result of TCCD in ILBF+ was found in 38 cases, with parallel ECCD+ in all of these patients. In 20 cases, TCCD did not show CCA (TCCD-), these also showed ECCD-. Of these patients 15 were ILBF- and 5 were ILBF+.

DISCUSSION

TCCD was not completely feasible or inconclusive in one third of the cases, whereas ECCD was always feasible. ECCD showed high validity with respect to the detection of CCA. Therefore, the possibility of using ECCD alone to detect CCA in ILBF-Dx should be discussed.

摘要

背景

更广泛地应用床旁彩色编码双功超声(CCD)检测脑循环停止(CCA)对于提高其在不可逆脑功能丧失诊断(ILBF-Dx)中的应用具有重要意义。

问题

在ILBF-Dx中检测CCA时,与常用的经颅脑供血血管CCD(ECCD与TCCD)相比,颅外CCD的特异性和敏感性是否相当?

材料与方法

研究时间为2019年1月至2022年6月,筛查136例患者,纳入114例在瞳孔固定散大、呼吸暂停且完成ILBF-Dx发作后超过24小时的严重脑损伤患者。排除无脑干无反射且不符合CCD指南适用性的患者。采用补充性ECCD(若使用其他方法检测不可逆性,则同时采用TCCD)。

结果

86.8%(99/114)的患者检测到ILBF(ILBF+),13.2%(15/1)的患者未检测到ILBF(ILBF-)。ECCD在所有患者中均完全可行;94/99例ILBF+病例(ECCD+)发现符合CCA的表现,5例患者未发现(ECCD-)。所有15例ILBF-患者均表现为ECCD-。因此,ECCD的特异性为1.0,敏感性为0.949。TCCD显示56例患者存在CCA(TCCD+),且所有这些患者也表现为ECCD+。38例ILBF+患者中TCCD结果不确定,但所有这些患者同时表现为ECCD+。20例患者TCCD未显示CCA(TCCD-),这些患者也表现为ECCD-。其中15例为ILBF-,5例为ILBF+。

讨论

三分之一的病例中TCCD不完全可行或结果不确定,而ECCD始终可行。ECCD在检测CCA方面显示出高有效性。因此,应讨论在ILBF-Dx中单独使用ECCD检测CCA的可能性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c26/10684716/733c9834d0e7/115_2023_1521_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验