Suppr超能文献

正常成年人中基于功率与基于平均频率的经颅彩色编码双功超声检查的比较研究。

Comparative study of power-based versus mean frequency-based transcranial color-coded duplex sonography in normal adults.

作者信息

Baumgartner R W, Schmid C, Baumgartner I

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Bern, Inselspital, Switzerland.

出版信息

Stroke. 1996 Jan;27(1):101-4. doi: 10.1161/01.str.27.1.101.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Power-based transcranial color-coded duplex sonography (p-TCCD) is a new ultrasonic method that has advantages compared with frequency-based TCCD (f-TCCD), since it is essentially independent of the angle of insonation, not subject to aliasing, and has a better signal-to-noise ratio. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of p-TCCD to visualize flow in cerebral parenchyma and to compare the advantages, limitations, and reliability of velocity measurements of p-TCCD versus f-TCCD in the major basal cerebral arteries of normal subjects.

METHODS

Two investigators performed 15 p-TCCD and 15 f-TCCD studies in 30 normal subjects with adequate ultrasonic windows. Each investigator did a p-TCCD or f-TCCD study in every patient, and each was blinded in every case to the results of the other. Peak systolic (Vs) and end-diastolic (Vd) velocities were determined in the anterior, middle, and posterior cerebral, basilar, and vertebral arteries. The reliability of p-TCCD velocimetry was evaluated by calculating both the correlation coefficient (r) of the difference between p-TCCD versus f-TCCD measurements and the coefficient of variation (CV), defined as the difference between the mean values for p-TCCD and f-TCCD divided by the mean values for f-TCCD measurements, expressed as percent.

RESULTS

p-TCCD did not display flow in cerebral parenchyma but depicted arteries with a course perpendicular to that of the ultrasound beam and showed good reliability of velocity measurements in all examined arteries: for Vs, r was .84 to .93 (P < .001) and CV was 7.7% to 10.8%; for Vd, r was .87 to .90 (P < .001) and CV was 10.3% to 13.7%. The lack of directional and velocity information and tissue motion artifacts were unimportant limitations in p-TCCD.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with f-TCCD, p-TCCD had no important advantages but had several unimportant limitations in a study of normal adults with adequate ultrasonic windows.

摘要

背景与目的

基于功率的经颅彩色编码双功能超声(p-TCCD)是一种新型超声检查方法,与基于频率的经颅彩色编码双功能超声(f-TCCD)相比具有优势,因为它基本不受声束入射角度的影响,不易出现混叠现象,且具有更好的信噪比。本研究旨在评估p-TCCD显示脑实质内血流的能力,并比较p-TCCD与f-TCCD在正常受试者大脑主要基底动脉中进行速度测量的优势、局限性及可靠性。

方法

两名研究人员对30例具有足够超声窗的正常受试者进行了15次p-TCCD和15次f-TCCD检查。每位研究人员对每位患者进行一次p-TCCD或f-TCCD检查,并且在每种情况下对另一位研究人员的检查结果均不知情。测定大脑前动脉、大脑中动脉、大脑后动脉、基底动脉和椎动脉的收缩期峰值速度(Vs)和舒张末期速度(Vd)。通过计算p-TCCD与f-TCCD测量值之间差异的相关系数(r)以及变异系数(CV)来评估p-TCCD测速的可靠性,CV定义为p-TCCD与f-TCCD平均值之差除以f-TCCD测量值的平均值,以百分比表示。

结果

p-TCCD未显示脑实质内的血流,但描绘了与超声束垂直走行的动脉,并且在所有检查的动脉中均显示出良好的速度测量可靠性:对于Vs,r为0.84至0.93(P < 0.001),CV为7.7%至10.8%;对于Vd,r为0.87至0.90(P < 0.001),CV为10.3%至13.7%。缺乏方向和速度信息以及组织运动伪像在p-TCCD中是不太重要的局限性。

结论

在具有足够超声窗的正常成年人研究中,与f-TCCD相比,p-TCCD没有重要优势,但有一些不太重要的局限性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验