• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Impact of TAVR on patients with severe aortic stenosis and liver cirrhosis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术对严重主动脉瓣狭窄合并肝硬化患者的影响。
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2023 Sep 1;325(3):H539-H544. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00342.2023. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
2
Outcomes and readmissions after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with cirrhosis: A propensity matched analysis.肝硬化患者经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术后的结局及再入院情况:一项倾向匹配分析
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan 1;91(1):90-96. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27232. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
3
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with cirrhosis.肝硬化患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Apr;87(5):955-62. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26345. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
4
The clinical impact of chronic liver disease in patients undergoing transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement: Systematic analysis of the 2011-2017 US hospital database.经导管和外科主动脉瓣置换患者慢性肝病的临床影响:对2011 - 2017年美国医院数据库的系统分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Dec 1;98(7):E1044-E1057. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29952. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
5
Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Complex Coronary Artery Disease.复杂冠状动脉疾病患者经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Nov 22;14(22):2490-2499. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.08.073.
6
Aortic valve replacement in patients with preexisting liver disease: Transfemoral approach with favorable survival.患有既往肝脏疾病患者的主动脉瓣置换术:经股动脉入路,生存率良好。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jan;95(1):54-64. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28319. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
7
Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low surgical risk: A meta-analysis of randomized trials and propensity score matched observational studies.低手术风险患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较:随机试验和倾向评分匹配观察性研究的荟萃分析
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Aug 1;92(2):408-416. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27518. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
8
Contemporary trends and outcomes in aortic valve replacement in patients with end-stage liver disease.终末期肝病患者行主动脉瓣置换术的当代趋势和结局。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Oct 1;96(4):947-955. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28834. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
9
Long-Term Outcomes After Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Cirrhosis: A Guide for the Hepatologist.肝硬化患者经导管和外科主动脉瓣置换术后的长期结局:肝病学家指南
Hepatology. 2020 Nov;72(5):1735-1746. doi: 10.1002/hep.31193. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
10
Increasing Wait-Time Mortality for Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Population-Level Study of the Transition in Practice From Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者等待时间导致的死亡率增加:一项关于从外科主动脉瓣置换术到经导管主动脉瓣置换术实践转变的人群水平研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov;13(11):e009297. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009297. Epub 2020 Nov 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Epidemiology of liver cirrhosis and associated complications: Current knowledge and future directions.肝硬化及其相关并发症的流行病学:当前知识和未来方向。
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Nov 7;28(41):5910-5930. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i41.5910.
2
Transcatheter interventions for valvular heart diseases in liver cirrhosis patients.经导管介入治疗肝硬化患者的心脏瓣膜病。
Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2023 May;33(4):242-249. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2021.12.014. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
3
Comparative outcomes in different aortic valve stenosis surgeries and implications of TAVR surgery for cirrhotic patients: A retrospective cohort study.不同主动脉瓣狭窄手术的比较结果及经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)对肝硬化患者的影响:一项回顾性队列研究
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Aug 6;57:244-248. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.07.056. eCollection 2020 Sep.
4
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) as bridge therapy restoring eligibility for liver transplantation in cirrhotic patients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)作为桥接治疗,使肝硬化患者恢复肝移植资格。
Am J Transplant. 2020 Sep;20(9):2567-2570. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15955. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
5
Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Chronic Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis.慢性肝病患者经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术的临床结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Ochsner J. 2019 Fall;19(3):241-247. doi: 10.31486/toj.18.0178.
6
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement to Treat Liver Decompensation.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗肝衰竭
CASE (Phila). 2018 Aug 9;2(5):186-191. doi: 10.1016/j.case.2018.04.011. eCollection 2018 Oct.
7
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2018 Adult Cardiac Surgery Risk Models: Part 1-Background, Design Considerations, and Model Development.美国胸外科医师学会 2018 年成人心脏外科学风险模型:第 1 部分——背景、设计考虑因素和模型开发。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 May;105(5):1411-1418. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
8
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2018 Adult Cardiac Surgery Risk Models: Part 2-Statistical Methods and Results.胸外科医师学会 2018 年成人心脏外科学风险模型:第 2 部分-统计方法和结果。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 May;105(5):1419-1428. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
9
Multidisciplinary approach to cardiac and pulmonary vascular disease risk assessment in liver transplantation: An evaluation of the evidence and consensus recommendations.多学科方法评估肝移植中心肺血管疾病风险:证据评估和共识推荐。
Am J Transplant. 2018 Jan;18(1):30-42. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14531. Epub 2017 Nov 18.
10
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with cirrhosis.肝硬化患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Apr;87(5):955-62. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26345. Epub 2015 Dec 23.

经导管主动脉瓣置换术对严重主动脉瓣狭窄合并肝硬化患者的影响。

Impact of TAVR on patients with severe aortic stenosis and liver cirrhosis.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, CAMC Health Education and Research Institute, Charleston, West Virginia, United States.

CAMC Vascular Center of Excellence, Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, West Virginia, United States.

出版信息

Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2023 Sep 1;325(3):H539-H544. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00342.2023. Epub 2023 Jul 21.

DOI:10.1152/ajpheart.00342.2023
PMID:37477691
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10538975/
Abstract

We sought to assess the impact of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) on patients that have both severe aortic stenosis (SAS) and liver cirrhosis on mortality at 365 days after index event. We identified 19,210 patients that met inclusion criteria using the TriNetX database, consisting of data from 58 large healthcare organizations collected between 1 January 2010 and 24 February 2022. Of those patients, 1,283 (3.2%) had SAS with liver cirrhosis that had a TAVR, and 19,210 (96.8%) had SAS with liver cirrhosis that did not have a TAVR. We analyzed the data to compare all-cause mortality at 365 days using the TriNetX web platform. In addition, we conducted propensity score matching (PSM) to reduce the effects of confounders between the two groups. Patients with SAS and liver cirrhosis that had a TAVR were older (72.4 ± 9.7 vs. 68.0 ± 11.8, < 0.001), and they had higher rates of heart failure (71.2 vs. 34.5%, < 0.001), coronary artery disease (72.0 vs. 31.2%, < 0.001), diabetes (52.5 vs. 41.2%, < 0.001), and chronic kidney disease (43.8 vs. 30.1%, < 0.001) compared with patients with SAS and liver cirrhosis without TAVR. PSM created two well-matched cohorts of 1,269 patients each. The TAVR group had a lower mortality rate compared with the no TAVR group (22.5 vs. 34.8%, < 0.0001) at 365 days. This was confirmed using a log-rank test. Given these data, it appears that there is a mortality benefit associated with TAVR in patients with SAS and liver cirrhosis. Risk calculators used to predict unfavorable surgical outcomes could flag a patient as ineligible for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) based on the presence of liver cirrhosis. Our data analysis suggests that performing a TAVR to treat severe aortic stenosis in patients with liver cirrhosis could decrease their mortality risk as opposed to not performing a TAVR. Careful consideration should be given to this patient population to ensure the best quality of life and long-term outcome.

摘要

我们旨在评估经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)对同时患有严重主动脉瓣狭窄(SAS)和肝硬化的患者在指数事件后 365 天死亡率的影响。我们使用 TriNetX 数据库确定了符合纳入标准的 19210 名患者,该数据库包含了 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 2 月 24 日来自 58 家大型医疗机构的数据。在这些患者中,有 1283 名(3.2%)患有 SAS 和肝硬化并接受了 TAVR,19210 名(96.8%)患有 SAS 和肝硬化但未接受 TAVR。我们使用 TriNetX 网络平台分析数据以比较两组患者在 365 天时的全因死亡率。此外,我们进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)以减少两组之间混杂因素的影响。与未接受 TAVR 的患者相比,接受 TAVR 的 SAS 和肝硬化患者年龄更大(72.4±9.7 岁 vs. 68.0±11.8 岁,<0.001),心力衰竭(71.2% vs. 34.5%,<0.001)、冠状动脉疾病(72.0% vs. 31.2%,<0.001)、糖尿病(52.5% vs. 41.2%,<0.001)和慢性肾病(43.8% vs. 30.1%,<0.001)的发生率更高。PSM 创建了两组各有 1269 名患者的匹配队列。与未接受 TAVR 的患者相比,TAVR 组的死亡率较低(365 天时 22.5% vs. 34.8%,<0.0001)。这一点通过对数秩检验得到了证实。根据这些数据,TAVR 似乎可以降低 SAS 和肝硬化患者的死亡率。用于预测不利手术结果的风险计算器可能会根据肝硬化的存在将患者标记为不适合接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)。我们的数据分析表明,在患有肝硬化的患者中,TAVR 治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄可以降低他们的死亡率,而不是不进行 TAVR。应该对这一患者群体进行仔细考虑,以确保他们获得最佳的生活质量和长期预后。