Albassam Omar, Henning Kayley A, Qiu Feng, Cram Peter, Sheth Tej N, Ko Dennis T, Woodward Graham, Austin Peter C, Wijeysundera Harindra C
Schulich Heart Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center (O.A., D.T.K., H.C.W.), University of Toronto, Canada.
ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada (K.A.H., F.Q., P.C., D.T.K., P.C.A., H.C.W.).
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov;13(11):e009297. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009297. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as a reasonable alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). There is limited data on temporal trends in wait-times and access to care for patients with AS, irrespective of treatment modality. We sought to investigate the trends in wait-times for the treatment (either SAVR or TAVR) of AS in Ontario, Canada, and to understand the drivers of wait-list mortality and hospitalization due to heart failure.
In this population-level retrospective cohort study, we identified patients from April 1, 2012, to March 31, 2018, who were referred for treatment of symptomatic severe AS awaiting either SAVR or TAVR. The primary outcome was the median total wait-time from referral date to either SAVR or TAVR procedure. Primary clinical outcomes were all-cause mortality and heart failure-related hospitalizations while on the wait-list.
The referral cohort consisted of a total of 22 876 referrals for aortic valve replacement, with (N=8098) TAVR and (N=14 778) SAVR referrals. The mean and median wait times for the overall AVR cohort were 87 and 59 days, respectively. The TAVR subcohort had longer wait-times (median 84 days) compared with the SAVR subcohort (median 50 days). Year over year, there was a statistically significant an increase in wait-times (<0.001) for the overall AS cohort as well as each of the TAVR (<0.0001) and SAVR (<0.0001) subgroups. Wait-time mortality was 2.5% (TAVR 5.2% and SAVR 1.05%), while the cumulative probability of heart failure hospitalization was 3.6% (TAVR 7.7% and SAVR 1.3%).
In patients with severe symptomatic AS awaiting aortic valve replacement, there has been a trend of increasing wait times for both SAVR and TAVR. This was associated with increasing mortality and hospitalizations related to heart failure while on the wait-list.
对于严重主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者,经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)已成为外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)的合理替代方案。无论治疗方式如何,关于AS患者等待时间和获得治疗机会的时间趋势数据有限。我们试图调查加拿大安大略省AS患者接受治疗(SAVR或TAVR)的等待时间趋势,并了解等待名单上因心力衰竭导致的死亡率和住院率的驱动因素。
在这项基于人群的回顾性队列研究中,我们确定了2012年4月1日至2018年3月31日期间因症状性严重AS等待SAVR或TAVR治疗而被转诊的患者。主要结局是从转诊日期到SAVR或TAVR手术的中位总等待时间。主要临床结局是等待名单上的全因死亡率和与心力衰竭相关的住院率。
转诊队列共有22876例主动脉瓣置换转诊患者,其中TAVR转诊8098例,SAVR转诊14778例。整个AVR队列的平均和中位等待时间分别为87天和59天。与SAVR亚组(中位50天)相比,TAVR亚组的等待时间更长(中位84天)。逐年来看,整个AS队列以及TAVR(<0.0001)和SAVR(<0.0001)亚组的等待时间均有统计学显著增加(<0.001)。等待时间死亡率为2.5%(TAVR为5.2%,SAVR为1.05%),而心力衰竭住院的累积概率为3.6%(TAVR为7.7%,SAVR为1.3%)。
在等待主动脉瓣置换的症状性严重AS患者中,SAVR和TAVR的等待时间均有增加趋势。这与等待名单上与心力衰竭相关的死亡率和住院率增加有关。