Treatment outcome of the Masquelet technique in 195 infected bone defects-A single-center, retrospective case series.

BACKGROUND

The Masquelet technique is a surgical procedure for the reconstruction of bone defects. During the first step, an osteosynthetically stabilized defect is filled with a cement spacer. The spacer induces a foreign body membrane, called a Masquelet membrane. In a follow-up procedure, the spacer is replaced by a bone graft, which ossifies in the subsequent phase.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 171 patients with 195 septic bone defects on the extremities that had been treated with the Masquelet procedure at the BG Klinikum in Hamburg, Germany, from 2011 to 2021 were retrospectively analysed, comparing patients who reached full weight and load bearing on the affected extremity to those who failed to do so. Defect size and configuration, microbiological results and treatment methods as well as comorbidities and epidemiologic data were analysed for factors influencing the treatment outcome.

RESULTS

In all, 113[66%] of the patients were male, and 58[34%] were female, with an age distribution of 52 +/-16 years. Out of 171 patients, 24 patients had two defects. The number of patients that reached full weight bearing was 152[89%], the follow-up period was 2 +/-1 years (median +/- SD). Full weight bearing capability was negatively by the defect size as defects >62 mm tended to be less likely to reach full weight bearing than smaller defects. A secondary stabilization with an internal stabilization was applied in 58[34%] of all patients and positively influenced the attainment of full weight and load bearing.

DISCUSSION

With 171 patients and 195 septic bone defects treated at a single centre with the Masquelet Technique, this study represents a comparably large cohort. Demographics, defect characteristics and treatment outcomes did not differ from those of other cohorts described in the literature. Defects larger than 62 mm showed lower chances to reach full weight bearing and can be defined as "critical defect size" for the Masquelet technique based on our data.