Suppr超能文献

采取行动:减少社交焦虑障碍后事件处理负面影响的简短干预措施的实验研究。

Just do something: An experimental investigation of brief interventions for reducing the negative impact of post-event processing in social anxiety disorder.

机构信息

Anxiety Treatment and Research Clinic, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON L8N 3K7, Canada; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada.

Anxiety Treatment and Research Clinic, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON L8N 3K7, Canada.

出版信息

J Anxiety Disord. 2023 Aug;98:102744. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102744. Epub 2023 Jul 16.

Abstract

Post-Event Processing (PEP) is prevalent and problematic in Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) but is typically not a direct target in evidence-based treatments such as cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for SAD. The primary aim of the current study was to examine the impact of several theoretically and empirically derived interventions for PEP in SAD, including concrete thinking, abstract thinking, and distraction in comparison to a control (i.e., do nothing) condition. Based on prior research, we hypothesized that the concrete and distract conditions would be associated with positive benefits, including reductions in PEP and improvements in self-perception, whereas the abstract and control conditions would not. The second aim of the study was to identify baseline variables that predict the trajectory of change in PEP over time. Participants (N=92) with a principal diagnosis of SAD completed a social stress task and were randomly assigned to one of four conditions. Participants completed measures at baseline, post-intervention/control, and at 1-week, and 1-month follow-up. Contrary to hypotheses, all three active conditions were similarly effective at reducing PEP and improving self-perceptions relative to the control condition. In the absence of an intervention, engagement in PEP remained high up to a month following the social stress task. Higher levels of baseline state anxiety, intolerance of uncertainty, and use of safety behaviours predicted greater PEP, even in the presence of an intervention. These results highlight the benefits of relatively brief interventions that disrupt the course of PEP for people with SAD. Such interventions can be easily incorporated into CBT protocols for SAD to enhance their effects.

摘要

事后处理(PEP)在社交焦虑症(SAD)中很常见,也很成问题,但在基于证据的治疗方法中,如认知行为疗法(CBT),通常不是直接的治疗目标。本研究的主要目的是研究几种针对 SAD 中 PEP 的理论和经验衍生干预措施的影响,包括具体思维、抽象思维和分心,与对照(即什么都不做)条件进行比较。基于先前的研究,我们假设具体和分心条件与积极的益处相关,包括减少 PEP 和改善自我认知,而抽象和对照条件则不会。研究的第二个目的是确定基线变量,这些变量可以预测 PEP 在时间上的变化轨迹。有 SAD 主要诊断的参与者(N=92)完成了一项社交压力任务,并被随机分配到四个条件之一。参与者在基线、干预/对照后以及 1 周和 1 个月随访时完成了测量。与假设相反,所有三个主动条件在减少 PEP 和改善自我认知方面与对照条件同样有效。在没有干预的情况下,即使在干预存在的情况下,PEP 的参与度在社交压力任务后一个月内仍然很高。较高的基线状态焦虑、无法容忍不确定性和使用安全行为预测 PEP 更高,即使存在干预。这些结果强调了相对短暂的干预措施的益处,这些干预措施可以中断 SAD 患者的 PEP 进程。这些干预措施可以很容易地纳入 SAD 的 CBT 方案中,以增强其效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验