• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

G20 国家的绿色转型与经济增长:来自能源细分来源的证据。

Green transition and economic growth in G20 countries: evidence from disaggregated energy sources.

机构信息

School of Management, Zhejiang Shuren University, Hangzhou, China.

School of Economics and Management, Panzhihua University, Panzhihua, 617000, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Aug;30(40):92206-92223. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28781-6. Epub 2023 Jul 24.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-023-28781-6
PMID:37482591
Abstract

Green transitioning through renewable energy sources is the most effective strategy for any economy. This study investigates the extent to which G20 countries are shifting towards a green economy compared to prioritizing economic growth. To this end, the present study analyzes the nodes between income and renewable (solar, wind, hydro, and biomass) and nonrenewable (oil, coal, and gas) energy sources for the period of (1997-2020) in G20 countries. The energy-environmental Kuznets curve method is applied to study their behavior at various stages of growth. The main findings showed that wind, solar, and biomass energies have an inverted N-shaped relationship with income. The hydroelectricity did not follow any traditional EKC shape, showing a steady positive trend and growth. While nonrenewable energy consumption, i.e., coal, oil, and gas, follows an N-shaped EKC curve. The impact of foreign direct investment in the solar and wind sectors is positive. The varying outcomes concerning foreign direct investment (FDI) indicate that although G20 countries strive to achieve their green transition objectives by discouraging environmentally harmful investments, their success remains limited. The study indicates that G20 nations are progressing toward a green transition; however, additional technological innovations are required to transform these economies from brown to green. Governments can establish research institutions, offer grants and incentives, and encourage collaboration between academia, industry, and government to support green technology R&D.

摘要

通过可再生能源实现绿色转型是任何经济体的最有效策略。本研究调查了 G20 国家在多大程度上优先考虑绿色经济,而不是优先考虑经济增长。为此,本研究分析了 1997-2020 年期间 G20 国家收入与可再生(太阳能、风能、水能和生物质能)和不可再生(石油、煤炭和天然气)能源之间的节点。采用能源环境库兹涅茨曲线方法研究它们在不同增长阶段的行为。主要发现表明,风能、太阳能和生物质能与收入呈倒 N 型关系。水力发电没有遵循任何传统的 EKC 形状,呈稳定的正增长趋势。而不可再生能源消费,即煤炭、石油和天然气,则遵循 N 型 EKC 曲线。太阳能和风能领域的外国直接投资的影响是积极的。关于外国直接投资(FDI)的不同结果表明,尽管 G20 国家通过抑制对环境有害的投资来努力实现其绿色转型目标,但它们的成功仍然有限。该研究表明,G20 国家正在向绿色转型迈进;然而,需要更多的技术创新将这些经济从棕色转变为绿色。政府可以建立研究机构,提供赠款和激励措施,并鼓励学术界、工业界和政府之间的合作,支持绿色技术研发。

相似文献

1
Green transition and economic growth in G20 countries: evidence from disaggregated energy sources.G20 国家的绿色转型与经济增长:来自能源细分来源的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Aug;30(40):92206-92223. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28781-6. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
2
Testing the Energy-Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis in the Renewable and Nonrenewable Energy Consumption Models in Egypt.检验埃及可再生能源和不可再生能源消费模型中的能源-环境库兹涅茨曲线假说。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 8;18(14):7334. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147334.
3
The impact of hydro-biofuel-wind-solar energy consumption and coal consumption on carbon emission in G20 countries.G20 国家的水能、生物能、风能、太阳能消费和煤炭消费对碳排放的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jun;30(28):72503-72513. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27442-y. Epub 2023 May 12.
4
Moderating and mediating role of renewable energy consumption, FDI inflows, and economic growth on carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from robust least square estimator.可再生能源消费、外国直接投资流入和经济增长对二氧化碳排放的调节和中介作用:稳健最小二乘估计的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Jan;26(3):2806-2819. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3837-6. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
5
Do foreign direct investment and renewable energy consumption affect the CO emissions? New evidence from a panel ARDL approach to Kyoto Annex countries.外国直接投资和可再生能源消费会影响二氧化碳排放吗?来自京都议定书附件国家的面板自回归分布滞后模型方法的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Nov;23(21):21669-21681. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-7413-7. Epub 2016 Aug 13.
6
Exploring the links between fossil fuel energy consumption, industrial value-added, and carbon emissions in G20 countries.探索 G20 国家中化石燃料能源消耗、工业增加值和碳排放之间的联系。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(4):10854-10866. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22605-9. Epub 2022 Sep 10.
7
Dynamics of renewable energy consumption and economic activities across the agriculture, industry, and service sectors: evidence in the perspective of sustainable development.可再生能源消费与农业、工业和服务业经济活动的动态关系:可持续发展视角下的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Jan;25(2):1375-1387. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-0552-7. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
8
The impact of hydro-biofuel-wind energy consumption on environmental cost of doing business in a panel of BRICS countries: evidence from three-stage least squares estimator.水—生物燃料—风能消费对金砖国家营商环境成本的影响:三阶段最小二乘法估计的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Feb;25(5):4479-4490. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-0797-1. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
9
Interrelationships among foreign direct investments, renewable energy, and CO emissions for different European country groups: a panel ARDL approach.不同欧洲国家群体的外国直接投资、可再生能源和二氧化碳排放之间的相互关系:面板 ARDL 方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Jul;26(21):21495-21510. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05415-4. Epub 2019 May 24.
10
A dynamic analysis of the impact of FDI, on economic growth and carbon emission, evidence from China, India and Singapore.外商直接投资对经济增长和碳排放影响的动态分析——来自中国、印度和新加坡的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Nov;29(54):82256-82270. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21546-7. Epub 2022 Jun 24.