Suppr超能文献

双注射器重力离心系统两种富血小板血浆抽吸技术对血浆细胞浓度的影响。

The effect of two platelet-rich plasma aspiration techniques on plasma cellular concentrations using a double syringe gravitational centrifugation system.

机构信息

BluePearl Specialty and Emergency Pet Hospital, Sandy Springs, Georgia.

出版信息

Vet Surg. 2024 Jul;53(5):936-941. doi: 10.1111/vsu.14003. Epub 2023 Jul 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify which aspiration technique increased plasma platelet concentration and which technique minimized plasma leukocyte and erythrocyte concentrations using a gravitational double-syringe platelet rich plasma (PRP) system.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

ANIMALS

Thirty adult dogs.

METHODS

Whole blood was collected into two autologous conditioned plasma (ACP) syringes and an ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA tube) (control samples). The ACP syringes were centrifuged for 5 min at 1500 rpm. The proximal 2 mL of plasma from one ACP syringe was deposited in an EDTA tube (preflash samples). Plasma from the second ACP syringe was withdrawn until the buffy coat was pierced, producing a "flash" of red blood cells, agitated and deposited into an EDTA tube (flash samples). Complete blood counts were performed.

RESULTS

Mean plasma platelet concentrations of the control, preflash, and flash samples were 2.4 × 10/dL, 3.3 × 10/dL and 4.1 × 10/dL, respectively. The mean platelet concentration of the flash samples was 7.9 × 10/dL higher than the preflash samples (p = .005). The mean platelet concentration was lower in the control samples than the preflash (p = .002) and flash (p < .0001) samples. The median plasma leukocyte concentration of the preflash samples (0/dL) was lower than in the flash samples (2.4 × 10/dL) (p = .001). The median plasma hematocrit value of the preflash samples (0%) was lower than in the flash samples (1.0%) (p = .002).

CONCLUSION

The flash method is not necessary to produce a PRP sample.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Both methods produced PRP. However, clinicians should avoid aspirating the buffy coat when processing PRP for therapies where leukocytes and erythrocytes are contraindicated.

摘要

目的

使用重力双注射器富血小板血浆(PRP)系统,确定哪种抽吸技术可提高血浆血小板浓度,哪种技术可最大程度降低血浆白细胞和红细胞浓度。

研究设计

对照实验室研究。

动物

30 只成年犬。

方法

全血分别收集到 2 个自体调理血浆(ACP)注射器和 1 个乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)管(对照样本)中。ACP 注射器以 1500rpm 离心 5min。ACP 注射器中近端 2mL 血浆被沉积到 EDTA 管中(预闪样)。从第二个 ACP 注射器中抽取血浆,直至刺破红细胞层,产生“闪光”,摇动并沉积到 EDTA 管中(闪样)。进行全血细胞计数。

结果

对照、预闪和闪样的平均血浆血小板浓度分别为 2.4×10/dL、3.3×10/dL 和 4.1×10/dL。闪样的平均血小板浓度比预闪样高 7.9×10/dL(p=0.005)。对照样本的平均血小板浓度低于预闪(p=0.002)和闪(p<0.0001)样本。预闪样的血浆白细胞浓度中位数(0/dL)低于闪样(2.4×10/dL)(p=0.001)。预闪样的血浆红细胞压积中位数(0%)低于闪样(1.0%)(p=0.002)。

结论

闪光法并非制备 PRP 样本所必需。

临床意义

两种方法均产生 PRP。然而,当处理 PRP 以用于禁忌白细胞和红细胞的治疗时,临床医生应避免抽吸白细胞层。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验