• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国促进药品可及性的回顾——问题与建议

A review of promoting access to medicines in China - problems and recommendations.

作者信息

Sun Jing, Hu Cecile Jia, Stuntz Mark, Hogerzeil Hans, Liu Yuanli

机构信息

School of Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, 5 Dongdansantiao, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.

Deerfield Institute, K Wah Center 3703, Middle Huaihai Rd 1010, 200031, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 20;18(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2875-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-018-2875-6
PMID:29458428
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5819167/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite recent reforms, distorting funding mechanisms and over-prescribing still maintain severe financial barriers to medicines access in China. Complicated and interrelated problems in the pharmaceutical sector require a common framework to be resolved as fragmented solutions do not work. We present a preliminary assessment of the impact of the national healthcare reforms on access to medicines, and propose policy recommendations for promoting universal access to medicines in China.

METHODS

Drawing on multiple sources of information, including a review of published literatures and official national data, field investigations in six provinces and interviews with key opinion leaders, this paper presents a preliminary assessment of the impact of the national healthcare reforms on access to medicines, and proposes policy recommendations for promoting universal access to medicines in China.

RESULTS

Public expenditure on medicines has been strictly controlled since the national healthcare reforms of 2009. Yet total pharmaceutical expenditure (TPE) and total health expenditure growth rates continuously outpaced the growth of gross domestic product (GDP). With 2.4% of GDP, TPE now exceeds that of most high income countries. The distorted provider and consumer incentives in the Chinese health system have not fundamentally changed. Price-setting and reimbursement mechanisms do not promote cost-effective use of medicines. Inappropriate price controls and perverse financial incentives are the un-resolved root causes of preference of originator brands for some major diseases and shortages of low-cost and low-consumption medicines. In addition, access to expensive life-saving medicines is yet systematically addressed.

CONCLUSIONS

The complicated and interdependent problems interact in a way that leads to significant system problems in China, which create dual challenges that both the developing country and the developed countries are facing. To further promote access to medicines, China should speed up the re-assessment of the quality and efficacy of domestically produced generic medicines; coordinate various reforms of price determination, insurance payments, and procurement policies; address medicine shortages through comprehensive policies and legislation; establish specific mechanisms to achieve sustainable equitable access to expensive essential medicines with health technology assessment as a tool to ensure that policy and priority setting are created in a coherent and evidence-based way.

摘要

背景

尽管近期进行了改革,但扭曲的资金机制和过度开药现象仍然对中国药品可及性构成严重的经济障碍。制药行业复杂且相互关联的问题需要一个共同框架来解决,零散的解决方案行不通。我们对国家医疗改革对药品可及性的影响进行了初步评估,并提出了促进中国药品普遍可及性的政策建议。

方法

本文利用多种信息来源,包括对已发表文献的回顾和官方国家数据、六个省份的实地调查以及与关键意见领袖的访谈,对国家医疗改革对药品可及性的影响进行了初步评估,并提出了促进中国药品普遍可及性的政策建议。

结果

自2009年国家医疗改革以来,药品公共支出受到严格控制。然而,药品总支出(TPE)和卫生总支出增长率持续超过国内生产总值(GDP)的增长。TPE目前占GDP的2.4%,超过了大多数高收入国家。中国卫生系统中扭曲的供方和消费者激励机制并未从根本上改变。定价和报销机制并未促进药品的成本效益使用。不当的价格管制和不合理的财务激励是一些重大疾病中原创品牌受青睐以及低成本、低消耗药品短缺的未解决根本原因。此外,获取昂贵救命药品的问题尚未得到系统解决。

结论

这些复杂且相互依存的问题相互作用,在中国导致了重大的系统问题,带来了发展中国家和发达国家都面临的双重挑战。为进一步促进药品可及性,中国应加快对国产仿制药质量和疗效的重新评估;协调价格确定

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5623/5819167/d3cf00e4ad49/12913_2018_2875_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5623/5819167/c1b4be246f68/12913_2018_2875_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5623/5819167/4a6e9cc1a8d3/12913_2018_2875_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5623/5819167/d3cf00e4ad49/12913_2018_2875_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5623/5819167/c1b4be246f68/12913_2018_2875_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5623/5819167/4a6e9cc1a8d3/12913_2018_2875_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5623/5819167/d3cf00e4ad49/12913_2018_2875_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A review of promoting access to medicines in China - problems and recommendations.中国促进药品可及性的回顾——问题与建议
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 20;18(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2875-6.
2
Time trends and determinants of pharmaceutical expenditure in China (1990-2009).中国药品支出的时间趋势及决定因素(1990 - 2009年)
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Mar;32(3):257-64. doi: 10.1007/s40273-013-0072-3.
3
Access to affordable medicines after health reform: evidence from two cross-sectional surveys in Shaanxi Province, western China.医改后获得平价药品的机会:来自中国西部陕西省的两项横断面调查证据。
Lancet Glob Health. 2013 Oct;1(4):e227-37. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70072-X. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
4
How and why pharmaceutical reforms contribute to universal health coverage through improving equitable access to medicines: a case of Ghana.医药改革如何以及为何通过改善药品公平可及性来促进全民健康覆盖:以加纳为例。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 7;11:1163342. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1163342. eCollection 2023.
5
Access and Affordability of Medicines in Malaysia: Need for a National Pricing Policy.马来西亚的药品可及性和可负担性:需要国家定价政策。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2019 Oct;17(5):641-654. doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00480-9.
6
Comprehensive taxonomy and worldwide trends in pharmaceutical policies in relation to country income status.与国家收入状况相关的制药政策的综合分类及全球趋势。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 25;17(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2304-2.
7
Measuring access to medicines: a survey of prices, availability and affordability in Shaanxi province of China.衡量药品可及性:中国陕西省药品价格、可及性和可负担性调查。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 1;8(8):e70836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070836. Print 2013.
8
The imperative for systems thinking to promote access to medicines, efficient delivery, and cost-effectiveness when implementing health financing reforms: a qualitative study.系统思维对于促进药品可及性、高效交付和在实施卫生筹资改革时的成本效益的必要性:一项定性研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Mar 21;16(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0550-x.
9
Spending on medicines in Israel in an international context.以色列药品支出的国际背景。
Isr Med Assoc J. 2005 May;7(5):286-91.
10
Interface policies bridging outpatient and hospital sectors in Europe: can cross-sectorial collaboration in reimbursement and procurement improve access to affordable medicines?欧洲门诊与医院部门衔接的界面政策:报销与采购方面的跨部门合作能否改善平价药品的可及性?
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2023 Jul-Dec;23(8):867-878. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2237683. Epub 2023 Jul 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Changes in Clinical Trials of Dermatological Drugs in Mainland China Between 2016 and 2022: A Narrative Review.2016年至2022年中国大陆皮肤病药物临床试验的变化:一项叙述性综述
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025 May;59(3):450-461. doi: 10.1007/s43441-025-00743-9. Epub 2025 Feb 13.
2
Impacts of National Reimbursement Drug Price Negotiation on drug accessibility, utilization, and cost in China: a systematic review.国家医保药品价格谈判对中国药品可及性、使用情况及成本的影响:一项系统评价
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Feb 4;24(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02390-w.
3
The reimbursement decision speed for oncology new drugs in China and its determinant factors.

本文引用的文献

1
Essential medicines for universal health coverage.全民健康覆盖的基本药物。
Lancet. 2017 Jan 28;389(10067):403-476. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31599-9. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
2
How much could be saved in Chinese hospitals in procurement of anti-hypertensives and anti-diabetics?中国医院在采购抗高血压药和抗糖尿病药方面能节省多少钱?
J Med Econ. 2016 Sep;19(9):881-8. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2016.1181641. Epub 2016 May 10.
3
A learning experience from price negotiations for vaccines.疫苗价格谈判中的一次学习经历。
中国肿瘤新药的报销决策速度及其决定因素。
Front Public Health. 2023 Oct 30;11:1207739. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1207739. eCollection 2023.
4
Factors and key problems influencing insured's poor perceptions of convenience of basic medical insurance: a mixed methods research of a northern city in China.影响参保者对基本医疗保险便利性不良感知的因素及关键问题:中国北方某市的混合方法研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jun 5;23(1):1066. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15993-1.
5
Perceptions of the benefits of the basic medical insurance system among the insured: a mixed methods research of a northern city in China.参保人员对基本医疗保险制度获益感知的混合研究:来自中国北方某市的研究
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 17;11:1043153. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1043153. eCollection 2023.
6
Two-stage dual-game model approach to view the difficulty of healthcare accessibility.两阶段双游戏模型方法视角下的医疗可及性难度。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 9;11:1078675. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1078675. eCollection 2023.
7
Self-Medication Behaviors of Chinese Residents and Consideration Related to Drug Prices and Medical Insurance Reimbursement When Self-Medicating: A Cross-Sectional Study.中国居民自我药疗行为及与自付药费和医保报销相关的考虑因素的横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 22;19(21):13754. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113754.
8
Improving access to medicines: lessons from 10 years of drug reforms in China, 2009-2020.改善药品可及性:中国 2009-2020 年十年药物改革的经验教训。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Nov;7(11). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009916.
9
Policies and measures implemented to reduce the impact of international sanctions on Iran's pharmaceutical sector.为减轻国际制裁对伊朗制药行业的影响而实施的政策和措施。
Res Pharm Sci. 2022 Apr 18;17(3):274-283. doi: 10.4103/1735-5362.343081. eCollection 2022 Jun.
10
Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccine Among High-Risk Occupations in a Port City of China and Multifaceted Strategies for Increasing Vaccination Coverage: A Cross-Sectional Study.中国港口城市高风险职业人群对新冠疫苗的接受度及提高疫苗接种覆盖率的多方面策略:一项横断面研究
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 Apr 14;15:643-655. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S352947. eCollection 2022.
Vaccine. 2015 May 7;33 Suppl 1:A11-2. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.12.050.
4
A price and use comparison of generic versus originator cardiovascular medicines: a hospital study in Chongqing, China.一种心血管药物通用名药与原研药的价格和使用比较:中国重庆的一项医院研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Oct 5;13:390. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-390.
5
A new entity for the negotiation of public procurement prices for patented medicines in Mexico.墨西哥专利药品采购价格谈判的新实体。
Bull World Health Organ. 2012 Oct 1;90(10):788-92. doi: 10.2471/BLT.12.106633. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
6
Switching from originator brand medicines to generic equivalents in selected developing countries: how much could be saved?在选定的发展中国家中,将品牌原研药转换为通用等效药物:可以节省多少费用?
Value Health. 2012 Jul-Aug;15(5):664-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.04.004. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
7
Realignment of incentives for health-care providers in China.中国医疗服务提供者激励机制的调整。
Lancet. 2010 Mar 27;375(9720):1120-30. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60063-3.