Sun Jing, Hu Cecile Jia, Stuntz Mark, Hogerzeil Hans, Liu Yuanli
School of Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, 5 Dongdansantiao, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
Deerfield Institute, K Wah Center 3703, Middle Huaihai Rd 1010, 200031, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 20;18(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2875-6.
Despite recent reforms, distorting funding mechanisms and over-prescribing still maintain severe financial barriers to medicines access in China. Complicated and interrelated problems in the pharmaceutical sector require a common framework to be resolved as fragmented solutions do not work. We present a preliminary assessment of the impact of the national healthcare reforms on access to medicines, and propose policy recommendations for promoting universal access to medicines in China.
Drawing on multiple sources of information, including a review of published literatures and official national data, field investigations in six provinces and interviews with key opinion leaders, this paper presents a preliminary assessment of the impact of the national healthcare reforms on access to medicines, and proposes policy recommendations for promoting universal access to medicines in China.
Public expenditure on medicines has been strictly controlled since the national healthcare reforms of 2009. Yet total pharmaceutical expenditure (TPE) and total health expenditure growth rates continuously outpaced the growth of gross domestic product (GDP). With 2.4% of GDP, TPE now exceeds that of most high income countries. The distorted provider and consumer incentives in the Chinese health system have not fundamentally changed. Price-setting and reimbursement mechanisms do not promote cost-effective use of medicines. Inappropriate price controls and perverse financial incentives are the un-resolved root causes of preference of originator brands for some major diseases and shortages of low-cost and low-consumption medicines. In addition, access to expensive life-saving medicines is yet systematically addressed.
The complicated and interdependent problems interact in a way that leads to significant system problems in China, which create dual challenges that both the developing country and the developed countries are facing. To further promote access to medicines, China should speed up the re-assessment of the quality and efficacy of domestically produced generic medicines; coordinate various reforms of price determination, insurance payments, and procurement policies; address medicine shortages through comprehensive policies and legislation; establish specific mechanisms to achieve sustainable equitable access to expensive essential medicines with health technology assessment as a tool to ensure that policy and priority setting are created in a coherent and evidence-based way.
尽管近期进行了改革,但扭曲的资金机制和过度开药现象仍然对中国药品可及性构成严重的经济障碍。制药行业复杂且相互关联的问题需要一个共同框架来解决,零散的解决方案行不通。我们对国家医疗改革对药品可及性的影响进行了初步评估,并提出了促进中国药品普遍可及性的政策建议。
本文利用多种信息来源,包括对已发表文献的回顾和官方国家数据、六个省份的实地调查以及与关键意见领袖的访谈,对国家医疗改革对药品可及性的影响进行了初步评估,并提出了促进中国药品普遍可及性的政策建议。
自2009年国家医疗改革以来,药品公共支出受到严格控制。然而,药品总支出(TPE)和卫生总支出增长率持续超过国内生产总值(GDP)的增长。TPE目前占GDP的2.4%,超过了大多数高收入国家。中国卫生系统中扭曲的供方和消费者激励机制并未从根本上改变。定价和报销机制并未促进药品的成本效益使用。不当的价格管制和不合理的财务激励是一些重大疾病中原创品牌受青睐以及低成本、低消耗药品短缺的未解决根本原因。此外,获取昂贵救命药品的问题尚未得到系统解决。
这些复杂且相互依存的问题相互作用,在中国导致了重大的系统问题,带来了发展中国家和发达国家都面临的双重挑战。为进一步促进药品可及性,中国应加快对国产仿制药质量和疗效的重新评估;协调价格确定