• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Writing knowledge, practices, efficacy, interests, attitudes, and beliefs of deaf education teachers: a randomized controlled trial.聋教育教师的写作知识、实践、效能、兴趣、态度和信念:一项随机对照试验。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 7;14:1214246. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1214246. eCollection 2023.
2
Does Teacher Self-Efficacy Predict Writing Practices of Teachers of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students?教师自我效能感是否能预测聋人及重听学生教师的写作实践?
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2021 Jun 14;26(3):438-450. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enab012.
3
Special and General Education Teachers' Beliefs About Writing and Writing Instruction.特殊教育教师和普通教育教师对写作及写作教学的看法。
J Learn Disabil. 2023 May-Jun;56(3):163-179. doi: 10.1177/00222194221092156. Epub 2022 May 3.
4
A national perspective on teachers' efficacy beliefs in deaf education.关于聋人教育中教师效能信念的全国性视角。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2012 Summer;17(3):367-83. doi: 10.1093/deafed/ens014. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
5
Teacher Predictors of Student Progress in Data-Based Writing Instruction: Knowledge, Skills, Beliefs, and Instructional Fidelity.基于数据的写作教学中学生进步的教师预测因素:知识、技能、信念和教学一致性。
J Learn Disabil. 2023 Nov-Dec;56(6):440-452. doi: 10.1177/00222194231157720. Epub 2023 Mar 19.
6
Exploring teachers' attitudes and self-efficacy beliefs for implementing student self-assessment of English as a foreign language writing.探究教师对于实施外语(英语)写作学生自我评估的态度和自我效能信念。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 25;13:956160. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.956160. eCollection 2022.
7
Writing instruction with grade-level/college-bound secondary deaf students.与中学阶段/即将升读大学的聋生一起进行写作指导。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2024 Mar 17;29(2):145-157. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enad062.
8
Do Special and General Education Teachers' Mindset Theories About the Malleability of Writing and Intelligence Predict Their Writing Practices?特殊教育教师和普通教育教师关于写作可塑性和智力的思维模式理论能否预测他们的写作教学实践?
J Learn Disabil. 2024 Mar-Apr;57(2):63-78. doi: 10.1177/00222194231181915. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
9
Early childhood teachers' writing beliefs and practices.幼儿教师的写作信念与实践。
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 9;14:1236652. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1236652. eCollection 2023.
10
How students' writing motivation, teachers' personal and professional attributes, and writing instruction impact student writing achievement: a two-level hierarchical linear modeling study.学生的写作动机、教师的个人及专业特质以及写作教学如何影响学生的写作成绩:一项两级分层线性建模研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 20;14:1213929. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1213929. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Variability in Language and Literacy Outcomes Among Deaf Elementary Students in a National Sample.全国样本中失聪小学生语言和读写能力结果的变异性。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Aug 13;15(8):1100. doi: 10.3390/bs15081100.

本文引用的文献

1
Special and General Education Teachers' Beliefs About Writing and Writing Instruction.特殊教育教师和普通教育教师对写作及写作教学的看法。
J Learn Disabil. 2023 May-Jun;56(3):163-179. doi: 10.1177/00222194221092156. Epub 2022 May 3.
2
Does Teacher Self-Efficacy Predict Writing Practices of Teachers of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students?教师自我效能感是否能预测聋人及重听学生教师的写作实践?
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2021 Jun 14;26(3):438-450. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enab012.
3
Written Language Outcomes of Deaf Elementary Students Engaged in Authentic Writing.聋校小学生真实写作的书面语言产出研究
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2020 Apr 5;25(2):224-238. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enz047.
4
Teachers' Self-Efficacy: The Role of Personal Values and Motivations for Teaching.教师的自我效能感:个人价值观及教学动机的作用
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 12;10:1645. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01645. eCollection 2019.
5
Etiology of teacher knowledge and instructional skills for literacy at the upper elementary grades.小学高年段读写教学的教师知识和教学技能的成因。
Ann Dyslexia. 2019 Apr;69(1):5-20. doi: 10.1007/s11881-018-00170-6.
6
The Writing Performance of Elementary Students Receiving Strategic and Interactive Writing Instruction.接受策略性与互动性写作教学的小学生的写作表现
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2015 Oct;20(4):385-98. doi: 10.1093/deafed/env022. Epub 2015 Jun 21.
7
A national perspective on teachers' efficacy beliefs in deaf education.关于聋人教育中教师效能信念的全国性视角。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2012 Summer;17(3):367-83. doi: 10.1093/deafed/ens014. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
8
"I was born full deaf." Written language outcomes after 1 year of strategic and interactive writing instruction.“我天生全聋。”经过一年的策略性与互动式写作教学后的书面语言成果。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2012 Winter;17(1):19-38. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enr018. Epub 2011 May 13.
9
Codeswitching techniques: evidence-based instructional practices for the ASL/English bilingual classroom.语码转换技巧:美国手语/英语双语课堂基于证据的教学实践
Am Ann Deaf. 2010 Fall;155(4):407-24. doi: 10.1353/aad.2010.0036.
10
Using balanced and interactive writing instruction to improve the higher order and lower order writing skills of deaf students.运用平衡且互动的写作教学来提高聋生的高阶和低阶写作技能。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2008 Spring;13(2):257-77. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enm052. Epub 2007 Oct 26.

聋教育教师的写作知识、实践、效能、兴趣、态度和信念:一项随机对照试验。

Writing knowledge, practices, efficacy, interests, attitudes, and beliefs of deaf education teachers: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Wolbers Kimberly, Dostal Hannah, Graham Steve, Branum-Martin Lee, Allen Thomas, Holcomb Leala, Saulsburry Rachel

机构信息

The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States.

University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 7;14:1214246. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1214246. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1214246
PMID:37484108
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10361062/
Abstract

Writing teachers play an extraordinarily important role in their students' writing development. Teachers' motivational beliefs, such as attitudes toward writing, perceptions of their efficacy to teach writing, or preparation to use evidence-based instructional practices, impact their writing instruction, which directly affects the advancement of students' writing skills. Deaf writers are a subpopulation of writers who may face discriminatory beliefs toward their writing development stemming from ableism, audism, or linguicism. Deaf education teachers may doubt their abilities to teach bilingual/multilingual students or teach deaf students experiencing language deprivation. The current study investigates whether deaf education teachers' beliefs can be fostered through an intensive one-year professional development (PD) program designed specifically for deaf education teachers. In this randomized controlled trial, we examine the extent to which the participation of deaf education teachers in specialized PD and subsequent writing instruction implementation ( = 26) impacts their pedagogical content , use of evidence-based for teaching writing, , , in teaching writing, and about writing compared to teachers in a business as usual condition ( = 24). Pre-post regression analyses indicate statistically significant group differences (with the treatment group scoring higher) on all variables except attitude and some epistemological beliefs. We speculate that specialized, sustained PD paired with supported implementation of writing instruction and ongoing teacher reflection are contributing factors to changes in teachers' motivational beliefs.

摘要

写作教师在学生的写作发展中发挥着极其重要的作用。教师的动机信念,如对写作的态度、对自己教授写作能力的认知,或使用循证教学实践的准备情况,会影响他们的写作教学,而这又直接影响学生写作技能的提升。聋人作家是作家群体中的一个亚群体,他们在写作发展过程中可能会面临因能力主义、听觉主义或语言主义而产生的歧视性观念。聋人教育教师可能会怀疑自己教授双语/多语学生或教授经历语言剥夺的聋人学生的能力。本研究调查了聋人教育教师的信念是否可以通过专门为聋人教育教师设计的为期一年的强化专业发展(PD)项目得到培养。在这项随机对照试验中,我们考察了聋人教育教师参与专门的专业发展以及随后实施写作教学(n = 26)与照常教学的教师(n = 24)相比,在教学内容、使用循证写作教学方法、写作教学中的策略运用以及对写作的信念等方面对他们产生的影响。前后回归分析表明,除了态度和一些认识论信念外,所有变量在两组之间都存在统计学上的显著差异(治疗组得分更高)。我们推测,专门的、持续的专业发展,加上对写作教学实施的支持以及教师的持续反思,是教师动机信念发生变化的促成因素。