Suppr超能文献

公众对痴呆症患者法律决策能力及规划工具的认知:对医疗从业者的启示

Public awareness of legal decision-making capacity and planning instruments in dementia: implications for health care practitioners.

作者信息

Sullivan Karen A, Purser Kelly, Graham Karen, Parkinson Lauren

机构信息

School of Psychology and Counselling, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2022 Jun 16;30(4):565-578. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2022.2060364. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

The protection of a person facing difficulties with legal decision-making can be challenging; however, estate planning documents (EPDs) can offer safeguards. Little is known about the community awareness of EPDs and their perceived importance, including for people with dementia. Two-hundred and thirty adults read a mild dementia vignette, proposed a diagnosis for the vignette character (VC), and rated the VC's legal decision-making capacity (DMC). The effect on ratings about DMC under different conditions was explored (e.g., variation of VC characteristics and the decision). Awareness, and the personal importance, of EPDs were assessed. DMC was affected by the variations in the VC's age, diagnosis, and the decision, as high- or low-stakes, but not VC sex. Awareness of EPDs was low; however, planning importance was increased for dementia. Although the public understand that dementia affects DMC, they require further information about EPDs to validly enact them, thereby reducing potential vulnerability.

摘要

保护面临法律决策困难的人可能具有挑战性;然而,遗产规划文件(EPDs)可以提供保障。对于EPDs的社区认知及其被感知的重要性,包括对患有痴呆症的人来说,人们了解得很少。230名成年人阅读了一个轻度痴呆症的案例,为案例中的角色(VC)提出诊断,并对VC的法律决策能力(DMC)进行评分。探讨了不同条件下对DMC评分的影响(例如,VC特征和决策的变化)。评估了EPDs的认知度和个人重要性。DMC受到VC年龄、诊断以及决策(高风险或低风险)变化的影响,但不受VC性别的影响。对EPDs的认知度较低;然而,痴呆症患者对规划的重要性有所增加。尽管公众了解痴呆症会影响DMC,但他们需要更多关于EPDs的信息才能有效地制定这些文件,从而减少潜在的脆弱性。

相似文献

1
Public awareness of legal decision-making capacity and planning instruments in dementia: implications for health care practitioners.
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2022 Jun 16;30(4):565-578. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2022.2060364. eCollection 2023.
6
[Ethical and legal issues in late stage of dementia].
Acta Med Port. 2008 Jan-Feb;21(1):65-71. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
7
A therapeutic approach to assessing legal capacity in Australia.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2015 Jan-Feb;38:18-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.01.003. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
9

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Ageism from a cross-cultural perspective: results from a national survey of Israelis over the age of 50.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2022 Sep;34(9):779-787. doi: 10.1017/S1041610221001241. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
2
Assessment of older adults' decision-making capacity in relation to independent living: A scoping review.
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Feb;30(2):e255-e277. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13487. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
3
What is at stake in decision-making capacity tools?
Int Psychogeriatr. 2022 Jun;34(6):503-505. doi: 10.1017/S1041610221000144. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
4
Talking about future decision-making capacity and advance care planning in diagnosis disclosure of dementia.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2021 Nov;33(11):1119-1121. doi: 10.1017/S1041610221000648. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
5
Advance care planning participation by people with dementia: a cross-sectional survey and medical record audit.
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2021 Mar 3;12(e3):e464-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002550.
9
Enduring Powers of Attorney and Financial Exploitation of Older People: A Conceptual Analysis and Strategies for Prevention.
J Aging Soc Policy. 2022 May 4;34(3):357-374. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2019.1704143. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
10
Professionals' views and experiences in supporting decision-making involvement for people living with dementia.
Dementia (London). 2021 Jan;20(1):84-105. doi: 10.1177/1471301219864849. Epub 2019 Jul 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验