Purser Kelly, Magner Eilis S, Madison Jeanne
Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
School of Law, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2015 Jan-Feb;38:18-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.01.003. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
Australia lacks a satisfactory, national paradigm for assessing legal capacity in the context of testamentary, enduring power of attorney and advance care directive documents. Capacity assessments are currently conducted on an ad hoc basis by legal and/or medical professionals. The reliability of the assessment process is subject to the skill set and mutual understanding of the legal and/or medical professional conducting the assessment. There is a growth in the prevalence of diseases such as dementia. Such diseases impact upon cognition which increasingly necessitates collaboration between the legal and medical professions when assessing the effect of mentally disabling conditions upon legal capacity. Miscommunication and lack of understanding between legal and medical professionals involved could impede the development of a satisfactory paradigm. This article will discuss legal capacity assessment in Australia and how to strengthen the relationship between legal and medical professionals involved in capacity assessments. The development of a national paradigm would promote consistency and transparency of process, helping to improve the professional relationship and maximising the principles of autonomy, participation and dignity.
澳大利亚缺乏一个令人满意的全国性范式,用于在遗嘱、持久授权书和预先医疗指示文件的背景下评估法律行为能力。目前,法律和/或医学专业人员是临时进行行为能力评估的。评估过程的可靠性取决于进行评估的法律和/或医学专业人员的技能水平和相互理解。痴呆症等疾病的患病率正在上升。此类疾病会影响认知,这使得在评估精神残疾状况对法律行为能力的影响时,法律和医学专业之间越来越需要合作。相关法律和医学专业人员之间的沟通不畅和缺乏理解可能会阻碍令人满意的范式的发展。本文将讨论澳大利亚的法律行为能力评估,以及如何加强参与能力评估的法律和医学专业人员之间的关系。制定一个全国性范式将促进程序的一致性和透明度,有助于改善专业关系,并最大限度地实现自主、参与和尊严的原则。