Mohammadzadeh Niloofar, Rahmani Katigari Meysam, Hosseini Rahil, Pahlevanynejad Shahrbanoo
Department of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Health Information Technology Department, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.
Iran J Public Health. 2023 May;52(5):913-923. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v52i5.12708.
This study was conducted to classify the types of evaluation methods in clinical health technologies based on a systematic review method.
An electronic search was conducted in three scientific databases including Scopus, PubMed and ISI. The search strategy was performed in Jul to Nov 2021 and based on the three main concepts of "evaluation", "technology", "health. This search has been restricted to 10 years (2011-2021). Moreover, it only was limited to English and papers published in journals and conferences proceeding.
Overall, 8149 references were identified for title and abstract screening. Full text screening was performed for 2674 articles, with 174 meeting the criteria for study inclusion.
Most of the technologies evaluated in these articles were associated with PC-based systems (N=107), and there have been fewer mobile apps (N=67). Most of used technologies were with goals of treatment (43%, N=74) and education (26%, N=45). Among all the methods, the most and the least used methods were usability (66%, N=115) and qualitative (1%, N=2) method, respectively. The most method for health clinical technologies is usability method especially in telemedicine field.
本研究旨在基于系统评价方法对临床健康技术中的评估方法类型进行分类。
在Scopus、PubMed和ISI这三个科学数据库中进行电子检索。检索策略于2021年7月至11月执行,基于“评估”“技术”“健康”这三个主要概念。该检索限于10年(2011 - 2021年)。此外,仅限于英文以及发表在期刊和会议论文集上的文章。
总体而言,共识别出8149篇用于标题和摘要筛选的参考文献。对2674篇文章进行了全文筛选,其中174篇符合纳入研究的标准。
这些文章中评估的大多数技术与基于个人电脑的系统相关(N = 107),而移动应用较少(N = 67)。大多数使用的技术目标是治疗(43%,N = 74)和教育(26%,N = 45)。在所有方法中,使用最多和最少的方法分别是可用性方法(66%,N = 115)和定性方法(1%,N = 2)。健康临床技术中最常用的方法是可用性方法,尤其是在远程医疗领域。