• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
'What effect do safety culture interventions have on health care workers in hospital settings?' A systematic review of the international literature.“安全文化干预措施对医院环境中的医护人员有何影响?” 对国际文献的系统综述。
HRB Open Res. 2022 Nov 18;5:48. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13576.2. eCollection 2022.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Effect of interventions to improve safety culture on healthcare workers in hospital settings: a systematic review of the international literature.干预措施对改善医院环境中医疗工作者安全文化的效果:国际文献的系统评价。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 May 7;13(2):e002506. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002506.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
7
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
8
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
9
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
10
Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare worker support interventions after patient safety incidents in health organisations: a protocol for a scoping review.卫生组织发生患者安全事件后有效实施医护人员支持干预措施的关键因素:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 4;12(8):e061543. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061543.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of interventions to improve safety culture on healthcare workers in hospital settings: a systematic review of the international literature.干预措施对改善医院环境中医疗工作者安全文化的效果:国际文献的系统评价。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 May 7;13(2):e002506. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002506.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient Safety and Staff Well-Being: Organizational Culture as a Resource.患者安全与员工福祉:组织文化作为一种资源。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 21;19(6):3722. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063722.
2
Relationships between nurses' experiences of workplace violence, emotional exhaustion and patient safety.护士的工作场所暴力经历、情感耗竭与患者安全之间的关系。
J Res Nurs. 2021 Mar;26(1-2):35-46. doi: 10.1177/1744987120960200. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
3
Effectiveness of customised safety intervention programmes to increase the safety culture of hospital staff.定制安全干预方案以提高医院员工安全文化的有效性。
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Oct;10(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000962.
4
Dimensions of safety culture: a systematic review of quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods for assessing safety culture in hospitals.安全文化的维度:系统综述评估医院安全文化的定量、定性和混合方法。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 27;11(7):e043982. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043982.
5
Coping strategies in health care providers as second victims: A systematic review.医护人员作为第二受害者的应对策略:系统评价。
Int Nurs Rev. 2021 Dec;68(4):471-481. doi: 10.1111/inr.12694. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
6
Patient safety educational interventions: A systematic review with recommendations for nurse educators.患者安全教育干预措施:护士教育者的系统评价及建议
Nurs Open. 2022 Jul;9(4):1967-1979. doi: 10.1002/nop2.955. Epub 2021 May 28.
7
Assessment of Patient Safety Culture Among Doctors, Nurses, and Midwives in a Public Hospital in Afghanistan.阿富汗一家公立医院医生、护士和助产士的患者安全文化评估
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Mar 19;14:1211-1217. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S292193. eCollection 2021.
8
The Irish National Adverse Event Study-2 (INAES-2): longitudinal trends in adverse event rates in the Irish healthcare system.爱尔兰不良事件研究-2(INAES-2):爱尔兰医疗体系中不良事件发生率的纵向趋势。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Jul;30(7):547-558. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011122. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
9
Adaptation and validation of a Korean-language version of the revised hospital survey on patient safety culture (K-HSOPSC 2.0).修订版患者安全文化医院调查问卷韩语版(K-HSOPSC 2.0)的改编与验证
BMC Nurs. 2021 Jan 7;20(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12912-020-00523-w.
10
No patient safety without health worker safety.没有卫生工作者的安全,就没有患者的安全。
Lancet. 2020 Nov 14;396(10262):1541-1543. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31949-8. Epub 2020 Sep 16.

“安全文化干预措施对医院环境中的医护人员有何影响?” 对国际文献的系统综述。

'What effect do safety culture interventions have on health care workers in hospital settings?' A systematic review of the international literature.

作者信息

Finn Mairéad, Mellon Lisa, Walsh Aisling, O'Brien Niall, Williams David J, Rafter Natasha, McCarthy Siobhán E

机构信息

Graduate School of Healthcare Management, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.

Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

HRB Open Res. 2022 Nov 18;5:48. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13576.2. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.12688/hrbopenres.13576.2
PMID:37485071
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10357077/
Abstract

: Interventions designed to improve safety culture in hospitals foster organisational environments that prevent patient safety events and support organisational and staff learning when events do occur. A safety culture supports the required health workforce behaviours and norms that enable safe patient care, and the well-being of patients and staff. The impact of safety culture interventions on staff perceptions of safety culture and patient outcomes has been established. To-date, however, there is no common understanding of what staff outcomes are associated with interventions to improve safety culture and what staff outcomes should be measured. : The study seeks to examine the effect of safety culture interventions on staff in hospital settings, globally. : A mixed methods systematic review will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Searches will be conducted using the electronic databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Health Business Elite, and Scopus. Returns will be screened in Covidence according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. The mixed-methods appraisal tool (MMAT) will be used as a quality assessment tool. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials and non-randomised studies of interventions will be employed to verify bias. Synthesis will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidance for mixed methods reviews, which recommends a convergent approach to synthesis and integration. : This systematic review will contribute to the international evidence on how interventions to improve safety culture may support staff outcomes and how such interventions may be appropriately designed and implemented.

摘要

旨在改善医院安全文化的干预措施可营造组织环境,预防患者安全事件,并在事件发生时支持组织和员工学习。安全文化支持所需的卫生人力行为和规范,以实现安全的患者护理以及患者和员工的福祉。安全文化干预措施对员工对安全文化的认知和患者结局的影响已得到证实。然而,迄今为止,对于哪些员工结局与改善安全文化的干预措施相关以及应衡量哪些员工结局,尚无共识。

该研究旨在考察全球范围内安全文化干预措施对医院员工的影响。

将根据系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行混合方法系统评价。将使用MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、Health Business Elite和Scopus等电子数据库进行检索。检索结果将根据纳入和排除标准在Covidence中进行筛选。将使用混合方法评估工具(MMAT)作为质量评估工具。将采用Cochrane协作网评估随机试验和非随机干预研究偏倚风险的工具来验证偏倚。将遵循乔安娜·布里格斯研究所混合方法评价的方法学指南进行综合分析,该指南推荐采用收敛性方法进行综合和整合。

本系统评价将为国际证据做出贡献,说明改善安全文化的干预措施如何支持员工结局,以及此类干预措施应如何进行适当设计和实施。