Suppr超能文献

解析脑转移瘤患者院内转科的模式和预测因素。

Dissecting patterns and predictors of interhospital transfers for patients with brain metastasis.

机构信息

Departments of1Neurosurgery and.

2Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; and.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 2023 Jul 14;140(1):27-37. doi: 10.3171/2023.5.JNS222922. Print 2024 Jan 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Interhospital transfers in the acute setting may contribute to high cost, patient inconvenience, and delayed treatment. The authors sought to understand patterns and predictors in the transfer of brain metastasis patients after emergency department (ED) encounter.

METHODS

The authors analyzed 3037 patients with brain metastasis who presented to the ED in Massachusetts and were included in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Database and State Emergency Department Database in 2018 and 2019.

RESULTS

The authors found that 6.9% of brain metastasis patients who presented to the ED were transferred to another facility, either directly or indirectly after admission. The sending EDs were more likely to be nonteaching hospitals without neurosurgery and radiation oncology services (p < 0.01). Transferred patients were more likely to present with neurological symptoms compared to those admitted or discharged (p < 0.01). Among those transferred, approximately 30% did not undergo a significant procedure after transfer and approximately 10% were discharged within 3 days, in addition to not undergoing significant interventions. In total, 74% of transferred patients were sent to a facility significantly farther (> 3 miles) than the nearest facility with neurosurgery and radiation oncology services. Further distance transfers were not associated with improvements in 30-day readmission rate (OR [95% CI] 0.64 [0.30-1.34] for 15-30 miles; OR [95% CI] 0.73 [0.37-1.46] for > 30 miles), 90-day readmission rate (OR [95% CI] 0.50 [0.18-1.28] for 15-30 miles; OR [95% CI] 0.53 [0.18-1.51] for > 30 miles), and length of stay (OR [95% CI] 1.21 days [0.94-1.29] for both 15-30 miles and > 30 miles) compared to close-distance transfers.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors identified a notable proportion of transfers without subsequent significant intervention or appreciable medical management. This may reflect ED physician discomfort with the neurological symptoms of brain metastasis. Many patients were also transferred to hospitals distant from their point of origin and demonstrated no differences in readmission rates and length of stay.

摘要

目的

在急症环境下的医院间转运会导致高成本、患者不便和治疗延误。作者试图了解急诊(ED)就诊后脑转移患者转院的模式和预测因素。

方法

作者分析了 2018 年和 2019 年在马萨诸塞州的 ED 就诊并纳入医疗保健成本和利用项目州住院数据库和州急诊数据库的 3037 名脑转移患者。

结果

作者发现,6.9%的 ED 就诊脑转移患者在入院后直接或间接转往其他医疗机构。转院的 ED 更有可能是非教学医院,没有神经外科和放射肿瘤学服务(p<0.01)。与入院或出院的患者相比,转院患者更有可能出现神经系统症状(p<0.01)。在转院的患者中,约 30%在转院后未进行重大手术,约 10%在 3 天内出院,且未进行重大干预。总的来说,74%的转院患者被送往离神经外科和放射肿瘤学服务最近的机构距离超过 3 英里的机构。更远距离的转院并没有改善 30 天再入院率(15-30 英里的 OR [95%CI] 0.64 [0.30-1.34];30 英里以上的 OR [95%CI] 0.73 [0.37-1.46])、90 天再入院率(15-30 英里的 OR [95%CI] 0.50 [0.18-1.28];30 英里以上的 OR [95%CI] 0.53 [0.18-1.51])和住院时间(15-30 英里和 30 英里以上的 OR [95%CI] 1.21 天[0.94-1.29]),与近距离转院相比。

结论

作者发现,相当一部分转院患者在转院后没有进行后续的重大干预或明显的医疗管理。这可能反映了 ED 医生对脑转移的神经系统症状感到不安。许多患者也被转往远离原籍的医院,但在再入院率和住院时间方面没有差异。

相似文献

5
Outcome of interhospital pediatric foreign body transfers.院际间儿童异物转移的结果。
Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Dec;74:73-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.09.049. Epub 2023 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of Hospital Connectedness in Brain Metastasis Outcomes.医院关联性在脑转移瘤治疗结局中的作用。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2435051. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.35051.

本文引用的文献

7
Recent advances in managing brain metastasis.脑转移瘤治疗的最新进展。
F1000Res. 2018 Nov 9;7. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.15903.1. eCollection 2018.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验