Suen Catherine G, Wood Andrew J, Burke James F, Guterman Elan L
Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Department of Neurology, Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Epilepsia. 2025 Apr;66(4):1199-1209. doi: 10.1111/epi.18254. Epub 2025 Jan 11.
Interhospital transfers for status epilepticus (SE) are common, and some are avoidable and likely lower yield. The use of interhospital transfer may differ in emergency department (ED) and inpatient settings, which contend with differing clinical resources and financial incentives. However, transfer from these two settings is understudied, leaving gaps in our ability to improve the hospital experience, cost, and triage for this neurologic emergency. We aimed to describe interhospital transfer for SE and examine the relationship between the site of transfer and hospital length of stay.
We performed a cross-sectional study of adult patients with SE who underwent interhospital transfer using data from the State Emergency Department Databases and State Inpatient Databases of Florida (2016-2019) and New York (2018-2019). The primary outcome was discharge after undergoing transfer. Secondary outcomes were discharge within 1 day, discharge after 30 days, receipt of electroencephalography (EEG), and discharge disposition.
There were 10 461 encounters for SE. Of 1790 ED encounters without admission to the same hospital, 324 (18.1%) resulted in transfer. Of 8671 hospitalizations, 629 (7.3%) resulted in transfer. Patients transferred from the ED were younger, more likely were White, more likely were in a metro area, and had fewer medical comorbidities than patients transferred from the inpatient setting. The median time to discharge was 5 days (interquartile range [IQR] = 2.0-9.0) after ED transfer and 10 days (IQR = 4.0-20.0) after inpatient transfer. There were 58 (17.9%) patients who were discharged within 1 day after undergoing transfer from an ED. ED transfers had higher rates of discharge at 30 days and higher likelihood of undergoing EEG at the receiving hospital and being discharged home.
A high proportion of patients with SE are discharged shortly after undergoing interhospital transfer, particularly those transferred from the ED. Understanding reasons for transfer is a crucial next step in triaging limited inpatient epilepsy resources and reducing costs associated with interhospital transfer.
癫痫持续状态(SE)的院际转运很常见,其中一些是可以避免的,且可能收益较低。院际转运在急诊科(ED)和住院部的应用可能有所不同,这两者面临着不同的临床资源和经济激励因素。然而,来自这两种环境下的转运情况研究较少,这使得我们在改善该神经系统急症的住院体验、成本和分诊能力方面存在差距。我们旨在描述SE的院际转运情况,并研究转运地点与住院时间之间的关系。
我们利用佛罗里达州(2016 - 2019年)和纽约州(2018 - 2019年)的州急诊科数据库和州住院患者数据库的数据,对接受院际转运的成年SE患者进行了一项横断面研究。主要结局是转运后出院。次要结局包括1天内出院、30天后出院、接受脑电图(EEG)检查以及出院处置情况。
共发生10461次SE诊疗。在1790例未入住同一家医院的ED诊疗中,324例(18.1%)导致了转运。在8671例住院患者中,629例(7.3%)导致了转运。与从住院部转运的患者相比,从ED转运的患者更年轻,更可能是白人,更可能位于大都市地区,且合并症更少。ED转运后出院的中位时间为5天(四分位间距[IQR]=2.0 - 9.0),住院部转运后为10天(IQR = 4.0 - 20.0)。有58例(17.9%)患者在从ED转运后1天内出院。ED转运患者在30天时的出院率更高,在接收医院接受EEG检查的可能性更大,且出院回家的可能性更大。
很大一部分SE患者在院际转运后不久即出院,尤其是那些从ED转运的患者。了解转运原因是分诊有限的住院癫痫资源并降低与院际转运相关成本的关键下一步。