• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Scholars180: An effective oral presentation assessment for optometry students.学者 180:一种有效的视光学学生口头报告评估方法。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 24;18(7):e0289081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289081. eCollection 2023.
2
Utilizing Bloom's taxonomy to design a substance use disorders course for health professions students.利用布鲁姆的教育目标分类法为健康专业学生设计一门物质使用障碍课程。
Subst Abus. 2018;39(3):348-353. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2018.1436634. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
3
Role of comprehension on performance at higher levels of Bloom's taxonomy: Findings from assessments of healthcare professional students.布卢姆认知目标分类学高阶水平表现与理解能力的关系:对医疗专业学生评估的研究结果。
Anat Sci Educ. 2018 Sep;11(5):433-444. doi: 10.1002/ase.1768. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Educator perspectives on implementing the Optometry Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health curriculum framework.教育工作者对实施验光师原住民及托雷斯海峡岛民健康课程框架的看法。
Clin Exp Optom. 2023 Mar;106(2):140-149. doi: 10.1080/08164622.2022.2102892. Epub 2022 Jul 31.
6
Question-Based Collaborative Learning for Constructive Curricular Alignment.基于问题的协作学习促进建设性课程对齐
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2021 Jan 5;11:1047-1053. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S280972. eCollection 2020.
7
Factors affecting the academic performance of optometry students in Mozambique.影响莫桑比克验光专业学生学业成绩的因素。
Optom Vis Sci. 2015 Jun;92(6):719-29. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000606.
8
Stirring deep thinking and learning through student-designed assessment problems.通过学生设计的评估问题激发深入思考和学习。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2021 May;13(5):536-543. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2021.01.007. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
9
Using Technology, Bioinformatics and Health Informatics Approaches to Improve Learning Experiences in Optometry Education, Research and Practice.利用技术、生物信息学和健康信息学方法改善验光教育、研究和实践中的学习体验。
Healthcare (Basel). 2016 Nov 15;4(4):86. doi: 10.3390/healthcare4040086.
10
Application of Bloom's taxonomy to formative assessment in real-time online classes in Korea.布鲁姆分类法在韩国实时在线课程形成性评估中的应用。
Korean J Med Educ. 2021 Sep;33(3):191-201. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2021.199. Epub 2021 Aug 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Peer to Peer Learning: Its Importance and Benefits.Peer to Peer Learning: Its Importance and Benefits. 对等学习:其重要性和益处。 (注:这里原文就是英文,可能是标题之类的,直接按要求翻译后,感觉中文表述有点怪怪的,一般“Peer to Peer Learning”常见的中文表述是“同伴互助学习” )
Acad Radiol. 2021 May;28(5):747-748. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2021.01.032. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
2
Inquiry in oral communication: adapting oral examinations for teaching introductory physiology students to evaluate scientific research studies.口腔交际中的探究:调整口腔考试以教授基础生理学学生评估科学研究。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2020 Jun 1;44(2):192-202. doi: 10.1152/advan.00087.2019.
3
Optometry Australia Entry-level Competency Standards for Optometry 2014.澳大利亚验光师协会2014年验光入门级能力标准。
Clin Exp Optom. 2015 Jan;98(1):65-89. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12216.
4
Why did I miss the diagnosis? Some cognitive explanations and educational implications.我为何漏诊?一些认知方面的解释及教育意义。
Acad Med. 1999 Oct;74(10 Suppl):S138-43. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199910000-00065.

学者 180:一种有效的视光学学生口头报告评估方法。

Scholars180: An effective oral presentation assessment for optometry students.

机构信息

Discipline of Optometry, School of Allied Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

Discipline of Pharmacy, School of Allied Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Jul 24;18(7):e0289081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289081. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0289081
PMID:37486941
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10365299/
Abstract

Oral presentation assessments are multifunctional tools that can potentially test all six cognitive domains of Bloom's taxonomy. Yet, they are not used as frequently as other forms of assessment in curriculums due to time limitations. Hence, designing effective oral presentation assessments that can overcome this is required. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether Scholars180, an oral presentation assessment developed for optometry students, would effectively help students improve their knowledge of and confidence in the identification and management of ocular diseases. This study utilized a non-randomized pre-questionnaire and post-questionnaire design where the participants (n = 31) were asked to assess their knowledge of ocular diseases before and after the oral presentation. The questionnaire was developed according to the unit outcomes. The responses to each of the 12 Likert-type scale questions on the post-questionnaire with the respective responses on the pre-questionnaire were compared. Students (n = 31) experienced improvements in their knowledge of eye diseases and even more so in their confidence and application of their knowledge. This was indicated by the statistically significant increases in median scores and low interquartile ranges (IQR) of ≤1.0. The peer evaluation also illustrated that students felt that the assessment contributed positively to their learning experience. Teachers require a variety of assessment methods to accurately test the student's authentic depth of knowledge and achievement of learning outcomes. Scholars180 is an effective assessment that follows constructive alignment and overcomes time limitations, providing teachers an assessment to consider implementing in the future.

摘要

口头报告评估是一种多功能工具,它可以潜在地测试布鲁姆分类法的六个认知领域。然而,由于时间限制,它们在课程中并不像其他评估形式那样经常使用。因此,需要设计能够克服这一问题的有效口头报告评估。本研究旨在探讨专为验光学生开发的 Scholars180 口头报告评估是否能有效帮助学生提高对眼部疾病的识别和管理的知识和信心。本研究采用了非随机前问卷和后问卷设计,参与者(n=31)被要求在口头报告前后评估他们对眼部疾病的知识。问卷是根据单元成果制定的。对后问卷中 12 个李克特量表问题中的每一个问题的回答与前问卷中的回答进行了比较。学生(n=31)在眼部疾病知识方面有所提高,在信心和知识应用方面更是如此。这表明中位数分数显著增加,四分位距(IQR)≤1.0。同伴评价还表明,学生认为评估对他们的学习体验有积极的影响。教师需要多种评估方法来准确测试学生的真实知识深度和学习成果的实现。Scholars180 是一种有效的评估方法,它遵循建设性的一致性,克服了时间限制,为教师提供了一种未来可以考虑实施的评估方法。