Reply to Letter to the Editor: 'Pros and Cons of a Novel Coronary Stenting Technique for Medina 0.0.1 Lesions: Osdokina Crush'.
作者信息
Acar Emrah, Güneş Yılmaz, İzgi İbrahim Akın, Kırma Cevat
机构信息
Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Abant İzzet Baysal University, Bolu, Türkiye.
Department of Cardiology, Health Sciences University Koşuyolu Cardiovascular Research and Training Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.
出版信息
Anatol J Cardiol. 2023 Sep 1;27(9):554-555. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2023.3541. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Reply to Letter to the Editor: 'Pros and Cons of a Novel Coronary Stenting Technique for Medina 0.0.1 Lesions: Osdokina Crush'.
Anatol J Cardiol. 2023 Sep 1;27(9):554-555. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2023.3541. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
2
Pros and Cons of a Novel Coronary Stenting Technique for Medina 0.0.1 Lesions: Osdokina Crush.
Anatol J Cardiol. 2023 Sep 1;27(9):552-553. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2023.3542. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
3
Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting for Left Main Distal Bifurcation Lesions: DKCRUSH-V Randomized Trial.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Nov 28;70(21):2605-2617. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.1066. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
4
Clinical Outcome of Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: The 5-Year Follow-Up Results From a Randomized and Multicenter DKCRUSH-II Study (Randomized Study on Double Kissing Crush Technique Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions).
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Feb;10(2):e004497. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004497.
5
Cardiovascular outcomes associated with crush versus provisional stenting techniques for bifurcation lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Apr 23;19(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1070-y.
6
Randomized Comparison of FFR-Guided and Angiography-Guided Provisional Stenting of True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: The DKCRUSH-VI Trial (Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions VI).
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Apr 20;8(4):536-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.12.221. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
7
Reply to Letter to the Editor: 'A Modified Medina and Movahed (3M) Classification of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions''.
Anatol J Cardiol. 2024 Mar 1;28(4):215. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2023.4020.
8
A randomized clinical study comparing double kissing crush with provisional stenting for treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions: results from the DKCRUSH-II (Double Kissing Crush versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions) trial.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Feb 22;57(8):914-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.10.023.
9
A Novel guide extension assisted stenting technique for coronary bifurcation lesions.
World J Cardiol. 2021 Jun 26;13(6):155-162. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v13.i6.155.
10
A novel technique for coronary bifurcation intervention: Double rewire crush technique and its clinical outcomes after 2 years of follow-up.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb 15;93(S1):851-858. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28066. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
本文引用的文献
1
One-Stent Double-Kissing Nano Crush- Osdokina Crush-Technique Could be a Game- Changer in the Treatment of Medina 0.0.1 Lesion.
Anatol J Cardiol. 2023 Jul 3;27(7):432-435. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2023.3220. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
2
Reply to Letter to the Editor: Provisional (Reverse) Double-Kissing Nano-Culotte Stenting.
Anatol J Cardiol. 2023 May;27(5):292-294. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2023.3150.
3
Clinical expert consensus document on drug-coated balloon for coronary artery disease from the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2023 Apr;38(2):166-176. doi: 10.1007/s12928-023-00921-2. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
4
Current Evidence and Future Perspective for Coronary Bifurcation Stenting.
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2022 Dec;50(8):595-609. doi: 10.5543/tkda.2022.22476.
5
Detection of Vulnerable Coronary Plaques Using Invasive and Non-Invasive Imaging Modalities.
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 1;11(5):1361. doi: 10.3390/jcm11051361.
6
Contemporary Management of Isolated Ostial Side Branch Disease: An Evidence-based Approach to Medina 001 Bifurcations.
Interv Cardiol. 2021 Apr 5;16:e06. doi: 10.15420/icr.2020.30. eCollection 2021 Apr.
7
Percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation coronary lesions: the 15 consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club.
EuroIntervention. 2021 Mar 19;16(16):1307-1317. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00169.
8
Bare metal or drug-eluting stent versus drug-coated balloon in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the randomised PEPCAD NSTEMI trial.
EuroIntervention. 2020 Apr 17;15(17):1527-1533. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00723.
9
Drug-coated balloon for treatment of de-novo coronary artery lesions in patients with high bleeding risk (DEBUT): a single-blind, randomised, non-inferiority trial.
Lancet. 2019 Jul 20;394(10194):230-239. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31126-2. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
10
"Inverted" provisional T stenting, a new technique for Medina 0,0,1 coronary bifurcation lesions: feasibility and follow-up.
EuroIntervention. 2010 Feb;5(7):814-20. doi: 10.4244/eijv5i7a136.
Zotero 插件