• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食管鳞癌的食管旁和消化腺周围淋巴结转移:预测生存和改良 N 分期系统。

Pararespiratory and paradigestive lymph node metastases in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: predicting survival and refining the N staging system.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, China.

Department of Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, 637000, China.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2023 Jul 24;23(1):695. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11055-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12885-023-11055-2
PMID:37488497
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10367276/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The site of lymph node metastasis (LNM) may affect the prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). To investigate the prognoses of pararespiratory and paradigestive LNM and to propose a novel N (nN) staging system that integrates both the LNM site and count.

METHODS

This study was a multicenter, large-sample, retrospective cohort study that included ESCC patients with LNM between January 2014 and December 2019 from three Chinese institutes. Patients were set into training (two institutes) and external validation (one institute) cohorts. The primary outcomes were survival differences in LNM site and the development of novel nodal staging system. The overall survival (OS) of patients with pararespiratory LNM only (Group A), paradigestive LNM only (Group B), and both sites (Group C) was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify the independent prognostic factors. An nN staging system considering both the LNM site and count was developed and evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

In total, 1313 patients were included and split into training (n = 1033) and external validation (n = 280) cohorts. There were 342 (26.0%), 568 (43.3%) and 403 (30.7%) patients in groups A, B and C, respectively. The OS of patients with pararespiratory and patients with paradigestive LNM presented significant differences in the training and validation cohorts (P < 0.050). In the training cohort, LNM site was an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio: 1.58, 95% confidence intervals: 1.41-1.77, P < 0.001). The nN staging definition: nN1 (1-2 positive pararespiratory/paradigestive LNs), nN2 (3-6 pararespiratory LNs or 1 pararespiratory with 1paradigestive LN), nN3 (3-6 LNs with ≥ 1 paradigestive LN), nN4 (≥ 7 LNs). Subsets of patients with different nN stages showed significant differences in OS (P < 0.050). The prognostic model of the nN staging system presented higher performance in the training and validation cohorts at 3-year OS (AUC, 0.725 and 0.751, respectively) and 5-year OS (AUC, 0.740 and 0.793, respectively) than the current N staging systems.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to pararespiratory LNM, the presence of paradigestive LNM is associated with worse OS. The nN staging system revealed superior prognostic ability than current N staging systems.

摘要

背景

淋巴结转移(LNM)部位可能影响食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者的预后。本研究旨在探讨肺旁和消化旁 LNM 的预后,并提出一种新的 N(nN)分期系统,该系统整合了 LNM 部位和数量。

方法

这是一项多中心、大样本、回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2014 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间来自中国三个研究所的 ESCC 伴 LNM 患者。患者被分为训练(两个研究所)和外部验证(一个研究所)队列。主要结局为 LNM 部位的生存差异和新的淋巴结分期系统的发展。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法评估肺旁 LNM 仅(A 组)、消化旁 LNM 仅(B 组)和两个部位均有 LNM(C 组)患者的总生存(OS)。采用 Cox 比例风险模型确定独立预后因素。采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)下面积(AUC)评估考虑 LNM 部位和数量的 nN 分期系统。

结果

共纳入 1313 例患者,分为训练(n=1033)和外部验证(n=280)队列。A、B 和 C 组患者分别为 342(26.0%)、568(43.3%)和 403(30.7%)。在训练和验证队列中,肺旁和消化旁 LNM 患者的 OS 存在显著差异(P<0.050)。在训练队列中,LNM 部位是独立的预后因素(风险比:1.58,95%置信区间:1.41-1.77,P<0.001)。nN 分期定义:nN1(1-2 个阳性肺旁/消化旁 LNs)、nN2(3-6 个肺旁 LNs 或 1 个肺旁加 1 个消化旁 LN)、nN3(3-6 个 LNs 伴≥1 个消化旁 LN)、nN4(≥7 个 LNs)。不同 nN 分期的患者亚组在 OS 方面存在显著差异(P<0.050)。nN 分期系统的预后模型在训练和验证队列中,3 年 OS(AUC,分别为 0.725 和 0.751)和 5 年 OS(AUC,分别为 0.740 和 0.793)的表现均优于现行 N 分期系统。

结论

与肺旁 LNM 相比,存在消化旁 LNM 与较差的 OS 相关。nN 分期系统显示出比现行 N 分期系统更好的预后能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31aa/10367276/b4904dae3e57/12885_2023_11055_Figc_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31aa/10367276/21d68bafa777/12885_2023_11055_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31aa/10367276/96f829671c7e/12885_2023_11055_Figb_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31aa/10367276/b4904dae3e57/12885_2023_11055_Figc_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31aa/10367276/21d68bafa777/12885_2023_11055_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31aa/10367276/96f829671c7e/12885_2023_11055_Figb_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31aa/10367276/b4904dae3e57/12885_2023_11055_Figc_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Pararespiratory and paradigestive lymph node metastases in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: predicting survival and refining the N staging system.食管鳞癌的食管旁和消化腺周围淋巴结转移:预测生存和改良 N 分期系统。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Jul 24;23(1):695. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11055-2.
2
A new classification of lymph node metastases according to the lymph node stations for predicting prognosis in surgical patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.一种根据淋巴结分站对食管鳞状细胞癌手术患者进行淋巴结转移分类以预测预后的新方法。
Oncotarget. 2016 Nov 15;7(46):76261-76273. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12842.
3
Impact of Metastatic Lymph Nodes on Survival of Patients with pN1-Category Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Long-Term Survival Analysis.pN1 期食管鳞癌患者转移淋巴结对生存的影响:长期生存分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Jun;31(6):3794-3802. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15019-z. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
4
Cervical lymph node metastasis classified as regional nodal staging in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after radical esophagectomy and three-field lymph node dissection.在根治性食管切除术和三野淋巴结清扫术后,颈淋巴结转移在胸段食管鳞状细胞癌中被归类为区域淋巴结分期。
BMC Surg. 2014 Dec 19;14:110. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-14-110.
5
Prognostic impact of lymph node metastasis along the left gastric artery in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.食管鳞状细胞癌中沿胃左动脉的淋巴结转移的预后影响
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 May 3;16(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01466-2.
6
Adequate lymph node dissection is essential for accurate nodal staging in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A population-based study.肝内胆管癌准确的淋巴结分期需要充分的淋巴结清扫: 一项基于人群的研究。
Cancer Med. 2023 Apr;12(7):8184-8198. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5620. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
7
Lymph node ratio-based staging system for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.基于淋巴结比率的食管鳞状细胞癌分期系统
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jun 28;21(24):7514-21. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i24.7514.
8
A proposal for combination of total number and anatomical location of involved lymph nodes for nodal classification in non-small cell lung cancer.提出一种非小细胞肺癌淋巴结分类的方法,即结合淋巴结总数和受累淋巴结的解剖位置。
Chest. 2013 Jun;143(6):1618-1625. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-0750.
9
Increased prognostic value of clinical-reproductive model in Chinese female patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.临床生殖模型在中国女性食管鳞癌患者中的预后价值增加。
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Apr 7;28(13):1347-1361. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i13.1347.
10
Anatomic extent of lymph node metastases as an independent prognosticator in node-positive major salivary gland carcinoma: A study of the US SEER database and a Chinese multicenter cohort.淋巴结转移的解剖范围是淋巴结阳性大涎腺癌的独立预后因素:美国 SEER 数据库和中国多中心队列研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Nov;45(11):2143-2150. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.06.029. Epub 2019 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
A prognostic nomogram based on lymph node skipping metastases in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.基于食管鳞状细胞癌淋巴结跳跃转移的预后列线图。
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Apr 30;17(4):1942-1957. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-1798. Epub 2025 Apr 27.
2
Metabolic reprogramming and therapeutic resistance in primary and metastatic breast cancer.原发性和转移性乳腺癌中的代谢重编程和治疗抵抗。
Mol Cancer. 2024 Nov 21;23(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12943-024-02165-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic impact of lymph node metastasis along the left gastric artery in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.食管鳞状细胞癌中沿胃左动脉的淋巴结转移的预后影响
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 May 3;16(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01466-2.
2
Prognostic Role of Nodal Skip Metastasis in Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Large-Scale Multicenter Study.淋巴结跳跃转移对胸段食管鳞癌预后的影响:一项大规模多中心研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Oct;28(11):6341-6352. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09509-z. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
3
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.
《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
4
Detecting lymph node metastasis of esophageal cancer on dual-energy computed tomography.双能 CT 检测食管癌淋巴结转移。
Acta Radiol. 2022 Jan;63(1):3-10. doi: 10.1177/0284185120980144. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
5
Modified nodal stage of esophageal cancer based on the evaluation of the hazard rate of the negative and positive lymph node.基于阴性和阳性淋巴结危险率评估的食管癌改良淋巴结分期。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Dec 7;20(1):1200. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07664-w.
6
Understanding Esophageal Cancer: The Challenges and Opportunities for the Next Decade.了解食管癌:未来十年的挑战与机遇
Front Oncol. 2020 Sep 10;10:1727. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01727. eCollection 2020.
7
Distribution of Lymph Node Metastases in Esophageal Carcinoma Patients Undergoing Upfront Surgery: A Systematic Review.接受 upfront 手术的食管癌患者淋巴结转移的分布:一项系统评价
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jun 16;12(6):1592. doi: 10.3390/cancers12061592.
8
Ways and tradition of Japan in esophageal surgery for cancer.日本在食管癌手术方面的方法和传统。
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Oct;68(10):1187-1192. doi: 10.1007/s11748-020-01369-4. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
9
Prognostic significance of middle paraesophageal lymph node metastasis in resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A STROBE-compliant retrospective study.可切除食管鳞状细胞癌中食管旁淋巴结转移的预后意义:一项符合STROBE标准的回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Oct;98(43):e17531. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017531.
10
Lymph Node Station-Based Nodal Staging System for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Large-Scale Multicenter Study.基于淋巴结站的食管癌淋巴结分期系统:一项大规模多中心研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Nov;26(12):4045-4052. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07601-7. Epub 2019 Jul 16.