Xu Mingyao, Harel Daphna, Carrier Marie-Eve, Kwakkenbos Linda, Bartlett Susan J, Gottesman Karen, Guillot Geneviève, Hummers Laura, Malcarne Vanessa L, Richard Michelle, Thombs Brett D
New York University, New York, New York.
Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2025 Mar;77(3):393-401. doi: 10.1002/acr.25199. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
To evaluate the degree that the Cochin Hand Function Scale (CHFS) generates scores that are comparable across language, sex, and disease subtype.
We included participants enrolled in the Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network (SPIN) Cohort who completed the CHFS at their baseline assessment between April 2014 and September 2020. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to test unidimensionality, and multiple indicator multiple cause (MIMIC) models were used for differential item functioning (DIF) analysis based on language, sex, and disease subtype. Both intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Pearson's correlation were calculated using factor scores obtained from unadjusted and DIF-adjusted MIMIC models to evaluate agreement and correlation between scores.
A total of 2,155 participants were included. CFA with covarying error terms supported a good fit of the model (χ[127] = 1,754.671; P < 0.001; Tucker-Lewis index = 0.985; comparative fit index = 0.987; root mean square error of approximation = 0.077). Nine items displayed statistically significant DIF for language of administration, 10 items for sex, and 10 items for disease subtype. However, the overall impact of DIF was negligible when comparing factor scores that did and did not account for DIF (ICC = 0.999; r = 0.999).
The CHFS has score comparability in systemic sclerosis regardless of participants' language, sex, and disease subtype.
评估科钦手功能量表(CHFS)所产生的分数在不同语言、性别和疾病亚型之间的可比性程度。
我们纳入了硬皮病患者中心干预网络(SPIN)队列研究中的参与者,这些参与者在2014年4月至2020年9月的基线评估时完成了CHFS。验证性因子分析(CFA)用于检验单维性,多指标多原因(MIMIC)模型用于基于语言、性别和疾病亚型的差异项目功能(DIF)分析。使用从未调整和DIF调整的MIMIC模型获得的因子分数计算组内相关系数(ICC)和皮尔逊相关系数,以评估分数之间的一致性和相关性。
共纳入2155名参与者。带有协变误差项的CFA支持模型的良好拟合(χ[127]=1754.671;P<0.001;塔克-刘易斯指数=0.985;比较拟合指数=0.987;近似均方根误差=0.077)。9个项目在施测语言方面显示出具有统计学意义的DIF,10个项目在性别方面,10个项目在疾病亚型方面。然而,在比较考虑和未考虑DIF的因子分数时,DIF的总体影响可以忽略不计(ICC=0.999;r=0.999)。
无论参与者的语言、性别和疾病亚型如何,CHFS在系统性硬化症中都具有分数可比性。