Rubino Selene, Battistone Michael J, Ardoin Stacy P, Berlan Elise D, Carandang Kristine, Chiseri Kate, Kavanaugh Arthur, White Whitney, Wise Kelly A, Wong Andrew L, Marston Bethany, Clowse Megan E B
University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
University of Utah, George E. Wahlen Veterans Affairs, and Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2025 Mar;77(3):330-336. doi: 10.1002/acr.25203. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
This study seeks to assess rheumatology fellows' (RFs') and program directors' (PDs') interests in different educational tools and methods and to facilitate curriculum development for reproductive health related to rheumatic disease.
Constructs were conceptualized in four dimensions: 1) RF and PD confidence in their current curriculum relating to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Reproductive Health Guidelines (RHGs), 2) personal interest in this topic, 3) opinions of the importance of this topic, and 4) interest in a range of learning materials and educational experiences. The final survey was distributed to 753 RFs and 179 PDs in the United States using the ACR Committee on Training and Workforce email list.
Response rates were 13% (n = 98) for RFs and 25% (n = 44) for PDs. Both groups indicated more interest in the topic than confidence in their curriculum and rated summary sheets, question banks, didactics, and online modules higher than nine other educational tools or methods. Despite interest in the topic, 38% of RF respondents and 24% of PD respondents were unaware of the recently published ACR RHGs.
RFs and PDs consider reproductive health very important and report high personal interest in this topic. In contrast, both groups indicated lower confidence in current curricula, and substantial proportions of both groups were unaware of recently published guidelines. RFs' and PDs' interests in specific educational modalities are aligned. Curriculum development efforts should prioritize summary sheets, question banks, didactics, and online modules. Efforts are needed to address the educational needs of practicing rheumatologists and other professionals caring for patients with rheumatic disease.
本研究旨在评估风湿病专科培训学员(RFs)和项目主任(PDs)对不同教育工具和方法的兴趣,并推动与风湿性疾病相关的生殖健康课程的开发。
构建了四个维度的概念:1)RF和PD对其当前与美国风湿病学会(ACR)生殖健康指南(RHGs)相关课程的信心;2)对该主题的个人兴趣;3)对该主题重要性的看法;4)对一系列学习材料和教育经历的兴趣。最终调查问卷通过ACR培训与劳动力委员会的电子邮件列表分发给美国的753名RF和179名PD。
RF的回复率为13%(n = 98),PD的回复率为25%(n = 44)。两组对该主题的兴趣均高于对其课程的信心,且对总结表、题库、教学法和在线模块的评分高于其他九种教育工具或方法。尽管对该主题感兴趣,但38%的RF受访者和24%的PD受访者并不知晓最近发布的ACR RHGs。
RF和PD认为生殖健康非常重要,并表示对该主题有很高的个人兴趣。相比之下,两组对当前课程的信心较低,且两组中相当比例的人并不知晓最近发布的指南。RF和PD对特定教育方式的兴趣是一致的。课程开发工作应优先考虑总结表、题库、教学法和在线模块。需要努力满足执业风湿病学家和其他照顾风湿性疾病患者的专业人员的教育需求。