• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

热点:糖尿病高危足家庭足部温度监测干预的依从性——叙事性综述。

Hotspots: Adherence in home foot temperature monitoring interventions for at-risk feet with diabetes-A narrative review.

机构信息

Leicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK.

Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2023 Oct;40(10):e15189. doi: 10.1111/dme.15189. Epub 2023 Jul 28.

DOI:10.1111/dme.15189
PMID:37489103
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Home foot temperature monitoring (HFTM) is recommended for those at moderate to high ulcer risk. Where a > 2.2°C difference in temperature between feet (hotspot) is detected, it is suggested that individuals (1) notify a healthcare professional (HCP); (2) reduce daily steps by 50%. We assess adherence to this and HFTM upon detecting a recurrent hotspot.

METHODS

PubMed and Google Scholar were searched until 9 June 2023 for English-language peer-reviewed HFTM studies which reported adherence to HFTM, daily step reduction or HCP hotspot notification. The search returned 1030 results excluding duplicates of which 28 were shortlisted and 11 included.

RESULTS

Typical adherence among HFTM study participants for >3 days per week was 61%-93% or >80% of study duration was 55.6%-83.1%. Monitoring foot temperatures >50% of the study duration was associated with decreased ulcer risk (Odds Ratio: 0.50, p < 0.001) in one study (n = 173), but no additional risk reduction was found for >80% adherence. Voluntary dropout was 5.2% (Smart mats); 8.1% (sock sensor) and 4.8%-35.8% (infrared thermometers). Only 16.9%-52.5% of participants notified an HCP upon hotspot detection. Objective evidence of adherence to 50% reduction in daily steps upon hotspot detection was limited to one study where the average step reduction was a pedometer-measured 51.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

Ulcer risk reduction through HFTM is poorly understood given only half of the participants notify HCPs of recurrent hotspots and the number of reducing daily steps is largely unknown. HFTM adherence and dropout are variable and more research is needed to determine factors affecting adherence and those likely to adhere.

摘要

背景

对于中高危足溃疡风险的人群,建议进行家庭足部温度监测(HFTM)。如果检测到足部(热点)之间的温差>2.2°C,则建议(1)通知医疗保健专业人员(HCP);(2)减少每天的步数 50%。在检测到复发热点时,我们评估对这一建议和 HFTM 的依从性。

方法

在 2023 年 6 月 9 日之前,我们在 PubMed 和 Google Scholar 上检索了以英语发表的关于 HFTM 的同行评审研究,这些研究报告了 HFTM、每日步数减少或 HCP 热点通知的依从性。检索结果排除重复项后返回 1030 项,其中有 28 项被列入短名单,11 项被纳入。

结果

HFTM 研究参与者每周至少 3 天的典型依从率为 61%-93%,或研究持续时间的>80%为 55.6%-83.1%。一项研究(n=173)表明,在研究持续时间内监测足部温度>50%与溃疡风险降低(优势比:0.50,p<0.001)相关,但>80%的依从性并没有发现额外的风险降低。自愿退出率为 5.2%(智能垫)、8.1%(袜子传感器)和 4.8%-35.8%(红外温度计)。只有 16.9%-52.5%的参与者在检测到热点时通知了 HCP。在检测到热点时,只有一项研究记录到每日步数减少 50%的客观证据,平均减少量为计步器测量的 51.2%。

结论

由于只有一半的参与者通知 HCP 出现复发性热点,而且每日减少步数的数量也大多未知,因此,通过 HFTM 降低溃疡风险的效果仍不清楚。HFTM 的依从性和退出率是可变的,需要进一步研究确定影响依从性的因素和可能依从的因素。

相似文献

1
Hotspots: Adherence in home foot temperature monitoring interventions for at-risk feet with diabetes-A narrative review.热点:糖尿病高危足家庭足部温度监测干预的依从性——叙事性综述。
Diabet Med. 2023 Oct;40(10):e15189. doi: 10.1111/dme.15189. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
2
Effectiveness of at-home skin temperature monitoring in reducing the incidence of foot ulcer recurrence in people with diabetes: a multicenter randomized controlled trial (DIATEMP).家庭皮肤温度监测对降低糖尿病患者足部溃疡复发率的效果:一项多中心随机对照试验(DIATEMP)。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021 Sep;9(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002392.
3
Efficacy of at home monitoring of foot temperature for risk reduction of diabetes-related foot ulcer: A meta-analysis.家庭足部温度监测对降低糖尿病相关足部溃疡风险的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2022 Sep;38(6):e3549. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3549. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
4
The cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of at-home infrared temperature monitoring in reducing the incidence of foot ulcer recurrence in patients with diabetes (DIATEMP): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.家庭红外体温监测在降低糖尿病患者足溃疡复发发生率方面的成本效益和成本效用(DIATEMP):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2018 Sep 24;19(1):520. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2890-2.
5
A pilot study testing the feasibility of skin temperature monitoring to reduce recurrent foot ulcers in patients with diabetes--a randomized controlled trial.一项测试皮肤温度监测以减少糖尿病患者足部溃疡复发可行性的试点研究——一项随机对照试验。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2015 Oct 9;15:55. doi: 10.1186/s12902-015-0054-x.
6
Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial to test for preventive effects of diabetic foot ulceration by telemedicine that includes sensor-equipped insoles combined with photo documentation.远程医疗中使用配备传感器的鞋垫结合照片记录预防糖尿病足溃疡的随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2019 Aug 22;20(1):521. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3623-x.
7
Factors Associated with the Local Increase of Skin Temperature, 'Hotspot,' of Callus in Diabetic Foot: A Cross-Sectional Study.与糖尿病足中骨痂局部皮肤温度升高(“热点”)相关的因素:一项横断面研究。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Sep;16(5):1174-1182. doi: 10.1177/19322968211011181. Epub 2021 May 20.
8
Continuous Temperature-Monitoring Socks for Home Use in Patients With Diabetes: Observational Study.糖尿病患者家用连续体温监测袜:观察性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Dec 17;20(12):e12460. doi: 10.2196/12460.
9
Implementation of foot thermometry plus mHealth to prevent diabetic foot ulcers: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.实施足部温度测量加移动健康技术预防糖尿病足溃疡:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Apr 19;17(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1333-1.
10
Skin temperature monitoring reduces the risk for diabetic foot ulceration in high-risk patients.皮肤温度监测可降低高危患者发生糖尿病足溃疡的风险。
Am J Med. 2007 Dec;120(12):1042-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2007.06.028.

引用本文的文献

1
Remote Foot Temperature Monitoring Among Veterans: Large Observational Study of Noncompliance and Its Correlates.退伍军人足部温度远程监测:关于不依从性及其相关因素的大型观察性研究。
JMIR Diabetes. 2024 Nov 5;9:e53083. doi: 10.2196/53083.