Suppr超能文献

皮肤癌与氢氯噻嗪:考虑种族/民族等个人风险因素的新型基于人群的分析。

Skin Cancer and Hydrochlorothiazide: Novel Population-Based Analyses Considering Personal Risk Factors Including Race/Ethnicity.

机构信息

Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (M.G.B., C.S.M., M.A.A.M., L.P., S.B.).

McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (J.L.L., M.A., S.B.).

出版信息

Hypertension. 2023 Oct;80(10):2218-2225. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.123.21274. Epub 2023 Jul 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hydrochlorothiazide, a common antihypertensive, has photosensitive properties, potentially increasing skin cancer risk. We evaluated melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer among hydrochlorothiazide users with 3 different cohorts as each allows assessment of different potential cofounders/effect modifiers, including race/ethnicity.

METHODS

We built 3 cohorts using IBM MarketScan Research Databases: Commercial and Encounters (>3.5 million individuals, 2010-2018), a subcohort with health risk assessment respondents (415, 330), and Medicaid (509, 767, 2011-2017). Adults (aged 18+ years) entered the respective cohort with a first-filled prescription (cohort entry) for hydrochlorothiazide (the exposure of interest) or angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (the active comparator), with ≥12 months of continuous enrollment with medical/pharmacy coverage at baseline. We excluded those who used hydrochlorothiazide/ACE inhibitor (including fixed-dose combination products) 12 months before cohort entry and those with prior skin cancer, HIV, or organ transplant. We compared the risk for hydrochlorothiazide versus ACE inhibitor using multivariate proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar, aside from more Black individuals among hydrochlorothiazide users (43.3% [95% CI, 43.0%-43.6%]) than ACE inhibitor users (28.1% [95% CI, 27.9%-28.3%]). The hazard ratio (95% CI) for nonmelanoma skin cancer related to hydrochlorothiazide (versus ACE inhibitor) was 0.96 (0.91-1.00) in the Commercial cohort, 1.01 (0.77-1.32) for the health risk assessment subcohort, and 1.33 (0.77-2.29) for Medicaid. For melanoma, the respective hazard ratios were 1.07 (0.95-1.20), 0.85 (0.43-1.67), and 0.93 (0.51-1.67), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our evaluation using 3 different approaches, including adjustment for race/ethnicity, did not establish a clear difference between hydrochlorothiazide and ACE inhibitor in terms of skin cancer risk.

摘要

背景

氢氯噻嗪是一种常见的降压药,具有光敏感性,可能会增加皮肤癌的风险。我们评估了氢氯噻嗪使用者中黑色素瘤和非黑色素瘤皮肤癌的发病率,这 3 个队列分别评估了不同的潜在混杂因素/效应修饰因素,包括种族/民族。

方法

我们使用 IBM MarketScan 研究数据库构建了 3 个队列:商业和就诊队列(超过 350 万人,2010-2018 年)、有健康风险评估应答者的亚队列(415 人,330 人)和医疗补助队列(2011-2017 年,509 人,767 人)。成年人(年龄≥18 岁)在首次服用氢氯噻嗪(感兴趣的暴露因素)或血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂(活性对照物)处方时进入相应队列(队列入组),并在基线时至少有 12 个月的医疗/药房覆盖的连续入组。我们排除了在队列入组前 12 个月内使用过氢氯噻嗪/ACE 抑制剂(包括固定剂量联合产品)以及有皮肤癌、HIV 或器官移植病史的患者。我们使用多变量比例风险回归比较了氢氯噻嗪与 ACE 抑制剂的风险。

结果

除了氢氯噻嗪使用者中黑人比例(43.3%[95%CI,43.0%-43.6%])高于 ACE 抑制剂使用者(28.1%[95%CI,27.9%-28.3%])外,基线特征相似。商业队列中,非黑色素瘤皮肤癌相关的氢氯噻嗪(与 ACE 抑制剂相比)的危险比(95%CI)为 0.96(0.91-1.00),健康风险评估亚队列为 1.01(0.77-1.32),医疗补助队列为 1.33(0.77-2.29)。对于黑色素瘤,相应的危险比分别为 1.07(0.95-1.20)、0.85(0.43-1.67)和 0.93(0.51-1.67)。

结论

我们使用 3 种不同方法进行评估,包括调整种族/民族因素,结果未表明氢氯噻嗪和 ACE 抑制剂在皮肤癌风险方面有明显差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验