From the Departments of Radiology (S.Y.C.) and Biostatistics, Clinical Trial Center (J.E.M.), Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea (J.H.M., J.H.L.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.H.K.); Department of Radiology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (H.J.P.); Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Y.Y.K.); Department of Radiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Y.E.H.); Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.B.); and School of Health and Environmental Science, College of Health Science, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Y.H.C.).
Radiology. 2023 Jul;308(1):e222463. doi: 10.1148/radiol.222463.
Background The 2017 international consensus guidelines for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas are widely used. Purpose To evaluate the interobserver agreement and diagnostic performance of MRI assessment in predicting the malignant potential of IPMN according to radiologists' experience. Materials and Methods This multicenter retrospective study included 100 patients with pathologically proven pancreatic IPMN (77 patients with surgery, 23 patients with biopsy) who underwent contrast-enhanced MRI between 2016 and 2021. Eight post-fellowship radiologists (four more-experienced [8-20 years] and four less-experienced [1-4 years] reviewers) evaluated MRI for high-risk stigmata and worrisome features identified by the most recent 2017 guidelines. Interobserver agreement was determined using Fleiss κ statistics according to radiologist experience. The diagnostic performance for malignant IPMN was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Results Among 100 patients (mean age, 66 years ± 10 [SD]; 57 men), 52 (52%) had malignant IPMN. For high-risk stigmata, interobserver agreement was substantial for main pancreatic duct size of at least 10 mm (κ = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.75, 0.82), enhancing mural nodule of at least 5 mm (κ = 0.70: 95% CI: 0.66, 0.74), and at least one high-risk stigmata (κ = 0.73: 95% CI: 0.69, 0.76). The worrisome features showed fair to substantial interobserver agreement (κ range, 0.22-0.80). More-experienced reviewers demonstrated better agreement in the assessment of at least one high-risk stigmata than less-experienced reviewers (κ = 0.77 vs κ = 0.69, < .001). The overall diagnostic performance of each reviewer was good for the prediction of malignant pancreatic IPMN (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] range, 0.77-0.84; median AUC, 0.82), with substantial agreement (κ = 0.76). Conclusion The 2017 international consensus guidelines enabled good diagnostic performance and substantial interobserver agreement for high-risk stigmata but not worrisome features on the evaluation of the malignant pancreatic IPMN using MRI. Agreement tended to be better among more-experienced reviewers than among less-experienced reviewers. © RSNA, 2023
背景 2017 年国际胰腺导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤(IPMN)共识指南被广泛应用。目的 评估 MRI 评估在预测 IPMN 恶性潜能方面的观察者间一致性和诊断性能,依据放射科医生的经验。
材料与方法 本多中心回顾性研究纳入了 100 例经病理证实的胰腺 IPMN 患者(77 例手术,23 例活检),这些患者于 2016 年至 2021 年间接受了对比增强 MRI 检查。8 位完成住院医师培训的放射科医生(4 位经验更丰富[8-20 年],4 位经验较少[1-4 年])根据最新的 2017 年指南评估 MRI 检查中高危特征和有问题的特征。根据放射科医生的经验,采用 Fleiss κ 统计量来确定观察者间一致性。采用受试者工作特征曲线分析评估恶性 IPMN 的诊断性能。
结果 在 100 例患者(平均年龄 66 岁±10[标准差];57 例男性)中,52 例(52%)患者的 IPMN 为恶性。对于高危特征,主胰管直径至少 10mm(κ=0.78;95%CI:0.75,0.82)、至少 5mm 的增强壁结节(κ=0.70:95%CI:0.66,0.74)和至少一个高危特征的观察者间一致性为显著(κ=0.73:95%CI:0.69,0.76)。有问题的特征表现出中等至显著的观察者间一致性(κ 值范围,0.22-0.80)。与经验较少的医生相比,经验更丰富的医生在评估至少一个高危特征时表现出更好的一致性(κ=0.77 比 κ=0.69,<.001)。每位医生预测恶性胰腺 IPMN 的总体诊断性能均较好(受试者工作特征曲线下面积[AUROC]范围,0.77-0.84;中位数 AUROC,0.82),一致性较好(κ=0.76)。
结论 2017 年国际共识指南使 MRI 评估胰腺高危 IPMN 具有较好的诊断性能和显著的观察者间一致性,但对评估有问题的特征则不然。与经验较少的医生相比,经验更丰富的医生之间的一致性往往更好。
© 2023 RSNA