Department of Rheumatology, Level 1, North Wing, Heidelberg Repatriation Hospital, Austin Health, 300 Waterdale Road, PO Box 5444, Heidelberg West, VIC, 3081, Australia.
Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Drug Saf. 2023 Nov;46(11):1049-1071. doi: 10.1007/s40264-023-01333-0. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have enormous appeal as immune-modulating therapies across many chronic inflammatory diseases, but recently this promise has been overshadowed by questions regarding associated cardiovascular and cancer risk emerging from the ORAL Surveillance phase 3b/4 post-marketing requirement randomized controlled trial. In that study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis with existing cardiovascular risk, tofacitinib, the first JAKi registered for chronic inflammatory disease, failed to meet non-inferiority thresholds when compared with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors for both incident major adverse cardiovascular events and incident cancer. While this result was unexpected by many, subsequently published observational data have also supported this finding. Notably, however, such a risk has largely not yet been demonstrated in patients outside the specific clinical situation examined in the trial, even in the face of many studies examining this. Nevertheless, this signal has practically re-aligned approaches to both tofacitinib and other JAKi to varying extents, in other patient populations and contexts: within rheumatoid arthritis, but also in psoriatic arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, atopic dermatitis, and beyond. Application to individual patients can be more challenging but remains important to harness the substantive potential of JAKi to the maximum extent safely possible. This review not only explores the evolution of the regulatory response to the signal, its informing data, biological plausibility, and its impact on guidelines, but also the many factors that clinicians must consider in navigating cardiovascular and cancer risk for their patients considering JAKi as immune-modulating therapy.
Janus 激酶抑制剂 (JAKi) 在许多慢性炎症性疾病中作为免疫调节疗法具有巨大的吸引力,但最近,由于在 ORAL Surveillance 阶段 3b/4 上市后要求进行的随机对照试验中出现与心血管和癌症风险相关的问题,这一前景黯然失色。在这项针对存在心血管风险的类风湿关节炎患者的研究中,与肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂相比,首个用于慢性炎症性疾病的 JAKi 托法替布在新发主要不良心血管事件和新发癌症方面均未达到非劣效性阈值。虽然这一结果令许多人感到意外,但随后发表的观察性数据也支持了这一发现。然而,值得注意的是,在试验中检查的特定临床情况下之外的患者中,这种风险在很大程度上尚未得到证实,即使有许多研究在研究这种风险。尽管如此,这种信号已经在不同程度上实际重新调整了托法替布和其他 JAKi 在其他患者人群和环境中的应用:在类风湿关节炎中,但也在银屑病关节炎、中轴型脊柱关节炎、炎症性肠病、特应性皮炎等疾病中。在个别患者中的应用可能更具挑战性,但仍然很重要,以便在安全的最大限度内充分利用 JAKi 的实质性潜力。本综述不仅探讨了对该信号的监管反应的演变、其信息数据、生物学合理性及其对指南的影响,还探讨了临床医生在为考虑使用 JAKi 作为免疫调节治疗的患者考虑心血管和癌症风险时必须考虑的许多因素。