常规与创新型机器人平衡评估在多发性硬化症患者中的相关性研究。

Standard versus innovative robotic balance assessment for people with multiple sclerosis: a correlational study.

机构信息

Scientific Research Area, Italian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation (FISM), Via Operai 40, 16149, Genoa, Italy.

Movendo Technology S.R.L, Genoa, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Med Res. 2023 Jul 26;28(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01223-2.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Balance disorders are common in people with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS) and, together with other impairments and disabilities, often prevent PwMS from performing their daily living activities. Besides clinical scales and performance tests, robotic platforms can provide more sensitive, specific, and objective monitoring. Validated technologies have been adopted as gold standard, but innovative robotic solutions would represent an opportunity to detect balance impairment in PwMS.

AIM

Study's aim was to compare postural assessment of 46 PwMS with a relapsing-remitting form during static tasks performed with the novel robotic platform hunova® and the gold standard EquiTest®, METHODS: Pearson's r was run on Center of Pressure (COP)-related parameters and global static balance measures computed from hunova® and EquiTest® in eyes-open (EO) and eyes-closed (EC) conditions. In addition, agreeableness level toward the use of both devices was tested through numeric rating scale.

RESULTS

Considering COP-related parameters, correlations were significant for all measures (p < .001). Interestingly, in EO, a strong correlation was shown for sway area (r = .770), while Medio-Lateral (ML) and Anterior-Posterior (AP) oscillation range, path length, ML and AP speed, ML and AP root mean square distance had a relatively strong association (.454 ≤ r ≤ .576). In EC, except for ML oscillation range showing a relatively strong correlation (r = .532), other parameters were strongly associated (.603 ≤ r ≤ .782). Correlations between global balance indexes of hunova® and EquiTest® revealed a relatively strong association between the Somatosensory Score in EquiTest® and the Somatosensory Index in hunova® (r = - .488). While in EO Static Balance Index from hunova® was highly correlated with Equilibrium score of EquiTest® (r = .416), Static Balance Index had a relatively strong association with both the Equilibrium (r = .482) and Strategy Score (r = .583) of EquiTest® in EC. Results from agreeableness rating scale revealed that hunova® was highly appreciated compared to EquiTest® (p = .044).

CONCLUSIONS

hunova® represents an innovative adjunct to standard robotic balance evaluation for PwMS. This confirms that combining traditional and robotic assessments can more accurately detect balance impairments in MS.

摘要

简介

平衡障碍在多发性硬化症患者(PwMS)中很常见,并且与其他损伤和残疾一起,常常使 PwMS 无法进行日常活动。除了临床量表和性能测试外,机器人平台还可以提供更敏感、更具体和更客观的监测。已采用经过验证的技术作为金标准,但创新的机器人解决方案将有机会检测 PwMS 的平衡障碍。

目的

本研究的目的是比较 46 名复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者在使用新型机器人平台 hunova®和金标准 EquiTest®进行静态任务时的姿势评估。

方法

在睁眼(EO)和闭眼(EC)条件下,对 hunova®和 EquiTest®计算的中心压力(COP)相关参数和整体静态平衡测量值进行 Pearson r 分析。此外,通过数字评分量表测试对两种设备的使用舒适度。

结果

考虑到 COP 相关参数,所有测量值的相关性均具有统计学意义(p < .001)。有趣的是,在 EO 中,摇摆面积(r = .770)表现出很强的相关性,而中侧向(ML)和前后向(AP)振荡范围、路径长度、ML 和 AP 速度、ML 和 AP 均方根距离具有相对较强的关联(.454 ≤ r ≤ .576)。在 EC 中,除了 ML 振荡范围表现出较强的相关性(r = .532)外,其他参数也具有很强的相关性(.603 ≤ r ≤ .782)。hunova®和 EquiTest®的整体平衡指标之间的相关性表明,EquiTest®中的体感评分与 hunova®中的体感指数具有较强的相关性(r = - .488)。而在 EO 中,hunova®的静态平衡指数与 EquiTest®的平衡评分高度相关(r = .416),在 EC 中,静态平衡指数与 EquiTest®的平衡(r = .482)和策略评分(r = .583)具有较强的相关性。舒适度评分量表的结果表明,hunova®比 EquiTest®更受好评(p = .044)。

结论

hunova®是多发性硬化症患者标准机器人平衡评估的创新补充。这证实了结合传统和机器人评估可以更准确地检测多发性硬化症患者的平衡障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0de9/10369743/5096a663fdb0/40001_2023_1223_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索