• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经圆窗入路结构保存型人工耳蜗植入后的人组织学研究

Human Histology after Structure Preservation Cochlear Implantation via Round Window Insertion.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.

Otopathology Laboratory, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2024 Feb;134(2):945-953. doi: 10.1002/lary.30900. Epub 2023 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1002/lary.30900
PMID:37493203
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Current surgical techniques aim to preserve intracochlear structures during cochlear implant (CI) insertion to maintain residual cochlear function. The optimal technique to minimize damage, however, is still under debate. The aim of this study is to histologically compare insertional trauma and intracochlear tissue formation in humans with a CI implanted via different insertion techniques.

METHODS

One recent temporal bone from a donor who underwent implantation of a full-length CI (576°) via round window (RW) insertion was compared with nine cases implanted via cochleostomy (CO) or extended round window (ERW) approach. Insertional trauma was assessed on H&E-stained histological sections. 3D reconstructions were generated and virtually re-sectioned to measure intracochlear volumes of fibrosis and neo-ossification.

RESULTS

The RW insertion case showed electrode translocation via the spiral ligament. 2/9 CO/ERW cases showed no insertional trauma. The total volume of the cochlea occupied by fibro-osseous tissue was 10.8% in the RW case compared with a mean of 30.6% (range 8.7%-44.8%, N = 9) in the CO/ERW cases. The difference in tissue formation in the basal 5 mm of scala tympani, however, was even more pronounced when the RW case (12.3%) was compared with the cases with a CO/ERW approach (mean of 93.8%, range 81% to 100%, N = 9).

CONCLUSIONS

Full-length CI insertions via the RW can be minimally traumatic at the cochlear base without inducing extensive fibro-osseous tissue formation locally. The current study further supports the hypothesis that drilling of the cochleostomy with damage to the endosteum incites a local tissue reaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4: Case-control study Laryngoscope, 134:945-953, 2024.

摘要

目的

目前的外科技术旨在在植入人工耳蜗(CI)时保护耳蜗内结构,以维持残余耳蜗功能。然而,最小化损伤的最佳技术仍存在争议。本研究旨在通过不同的插入技术比较人类 CI 植入时的插入性创伤和耳蜗内组织形成。

方法

将一位接受过全长 CI(576°)经圆窗(RW)插入的供体的最近颞骨与 9 例经耳蜗造口术(CO)或延伸圆窗(ERW)入路植入的病例进行比较。在 H&E 染色的组织切片上评估插入性创伤。生成 3D 重建并进行虚拟切片以测量纤维化和新生骨的耳蜗内体积。

结果

RW 插入病例显示电极通过螺旋韧带移位。9 例 CO/ERW 病例中有 2 例无插入性创伤。RW 病例纤维化和新生骨组织占据耳蜗的总容积为 10.8%,而 CO/ERW 病例的平均容积为 30.6%(范围 8.7%-44.8%,N=9)。然而,当将 RW 病例(12.3%)与 CO/ERW 方法的病例(平均 93.8%,范围 81%至 100%,N=9)进行比较时,基底 5mm 处鼓阶的组织形成差异更为明显。

结论

RW 全长 CI 插入术在耳蜗基底处可以最小化创伤,而不会在局部引起广泛的纤维-骨组织形成。本研究进一步支持了这样的假设,即耳蜗造口术的钻孔损伤骨内膜会引起局部组织反应。

证据水平

4:病例对照研究喉镜,134:945-953,2024。

相似文献

1
Human Histology after Structure Preservation Cochlear Implantation via Round Window Insertion.经圆窗入路结构保存型人工耳蜗植入后的人组织学研究
Laryngoscope. 2024 Feb;134(2):945-953. doi: 10.1002/lary.30900. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
2
Does cochleostomy location influence electrode trajectory and intracochlear trauma?蜗窗造口位置会影响电极轨迹和耳蜗内创伤吗?
Laryngoscope. 2015 Apr;125(4):966-71. doi: 10.1002/lary.24986. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
3
The new mid-scala electrode array: a radiologic and histologic study in human temporal bones.新型中阶电极阵列:人体颞骨的放射学与组织学研究
Otol Neurotol. 2014 Sep;35(8):1415-20. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000412.
4
Round window versus cochleostomy technique in cochlear implantation: histologic findings.圆窗与耳蜗造孔技术在人工耳蜗植入中的应用比较:组织学观察。
Otol Neurotol. 2012 Sep;33(7):1181-7. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318263d56d.
5
Comparison of round window and cochleostomy approaches with a prototype hearing preservation electrode.使用原型听力保护电极对圆窗和耳蜗造口术方法进行比较。
Audiol Neurootol. 2006;11 Suppl 1:42-8. doi: 10.1159/000095613. Epub 2006 Oct 6.
6
Three-dimensional quantification of fibrosis and ossification after cochlear implantation via virtual re-sectioning: Potential implications for residual hearing.通过虚拟切片对人工耳蜗植入后的纤维化和骨化进行三维定量:对残余听力的潜在影响。
Hear Res. 2023 Feb;428:108681. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108681. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
7
Predictors of Fibrotic and Bone Tissue Formation With 3-D Reconstructions of Post-implantation Human Temporal Bones.基于植入后人颞骨的 3D 重建预测纤维性和骨组织形成。
Otol Neurotol. 2021 Aug 1;42(7):e942-e948. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003106.
8
Cochlear implant electrode insertion: in defence of cochleostomy and factors against the round window membrane approach.人工耳蜗电极植入:支持蜗开窗术及反对圆窗膜入路的因素
Cochlear Implants Int. 2011 Aug;12 Suppl 2:S36-9. doi: 10.1179/146701011X13074645127478.
9
Radiologic Results and Hearing Preservation With a Straight Narrow Electrode via Round Window Versus Cochleostomy Approach at Initial Activation.初次激活时经圆窗与耳蜗开窗途径使用直窄电极的放射学结果及听力保留情况
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Jul;36(6):993-1000. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000726.
10
Comparison of depth of electrode insertion between cochleostomy and round window approach: a cadaveric study.鼓室切开术与圆窗入路电极植入深度比较:尸体研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Jul;281(7):3547-3555. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08466-7. Epub 2024 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Anatomical investigation of safety determining factors for keyhole drilling trajectories for robotic cochlear implant surgery.机器人人工耳蜗植入手术锁孔钻孔轨迹安全决定因素的解剖学研究
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Jan 17. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-09198-4.
2
Cochlear implant electrode design for safe and effective treatment.用于安全有效治疗的人工耳蜗电极设计
Front Neurol. 2024 May 2;15:1348439. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1348439. eCollection 2024.
3
Intracochlear Trauma and Local Ossification Patterns Differ Between Straight and Precurved Cochlear Implant Electrodes.
直形和预弯耳蜗植入电极的耳蜗内创伤和局部骨化模式不同。
Otol Neurotol. 2024 Mar 1;45(3):245-255. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004102. Epub 2024 Jan 17.