Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley 94720, United States.
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Middleton, Wisconsin 53562, United States.
Environ Sci Technol. 2023 Aug 8;57(31):11401-11409. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c02727. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
Low carbon fuel and waste management policies at the federal and state levels have catalyzed the construction of California's wet anaerobic digestion (AD) facilities. Wet ADs can digest food waste and dairy manure to produce compressed natural gas (CNG) for natural gas vehicles or electricity for electric vehicles (EVs). Carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) of CO generated from AD reduces the fuel carbon intensity by carbon removal in addition to avoided methane emissions. Using a combined lifecycle and techno-economic analysis, we determine the most cost-effective design under current and forthcoming federal and state low carbon fuel policies. Under many scenarios, designs that convert biogas to electricity for EVs (Biogas to EV) are favored; however, CCS is only cost-effective in these systems with policy incentives that exceed $200/tonne of CO captured. Adding CCS to CNG-producing systems () only requires a single unit operation to prepare the CO for sequestration, with a sequestration cost of $34/tonne. When maximizing negative emissions is the goal, incentives are needed to either (1) fund CCS with Biogas to EV designs or (2) favor CNG over electricity production from wet AD facilities.
联邦和州级的低碳燃料和废物管理政策推动了加利福尼亚州湿式厌氧消化(AD)设施的建设。湿式 AD 可以消化食物垃圾和奶牛粪便,为天然气车辆生产压缩天然气(CNG)或为电动汽车(EV)生产电力。AD 产生的 CO 进行碳捕获和封存(CCS)除了避免甲烷排放外,还通过去除碳来降低燃料的碳强度。通过生命周期和技术经济综合分析,我们确定了在当前和即将出台的联邦和州低碳燃料政策下最具成本效益的设计。在许多情况下,将沼气转化为电动汽车电力的设计(沼气到 EV)更受欢迎;然而,只有在政策激励超过 200 美元/吨 CO 捕获的情况下,CCS 才具有成本效益。向生产 CNG 的系统添加 CCS()只需要一个单元操作即可准备 CO 进行封存,封存成本为 34 美元/吨。当最大限度地减少排放是目标时,需要激励措施来(1)为沼气到 EV 设计提供 CCS 资金,或(2)优先考虑 CNG 而不是湿式 AD 设施的电力生产。