• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

皮下植入式心脏复律除颤器系统的上市后研究。

Postapproval Study of a Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator System.

机构信息

Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.

Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Aug 1;82(5):383-397. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.05.034.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2023.05.034
PMID:37495274
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) was developed to avoid complications related to transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (TV-ICD) leads. Device safety and efficacy were demonstrated previously with atypical clinical patients or limited follow-up.

OBJECTIVES

The S-ICD PAS (Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator System Post Approval Study) is a real-world, multicenter, registry of U.S. centers that was designed to assess long-term S-ICD safety and efficacy in a diverse group of patients and implantation centers.

METHODS

Patients were enrolled in 86 U.S. centers with standard S-ICD indications and were observed for up to 5 years. Efficacy endpoints were first and final shock efficacy. Safety endpoints were complications directly related to the S-ICD system or implantation procedure. Endpoints were assessed using prespecified performance goals.

RESULTS

A total of 1,643 patients were prospectively enrolled, with a median follow-up of 4.2 years. All prespecified safety and efficacy endpoint goals were met. Shock efficacy rates for discrete episodes of ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation were 98.4%, and they did not differ significantly across follow-up years (P = 0.68). S-ICD-related and electrode-related complication-free rates were 93.4% and 99.3%, respectively. Only 1.6% of patients had their devices replaced by a TV-ICD for a pacing need. Cumulative all-cause mortality was 21.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

In the largest prospective study of the S-ICD to date, all study endpoints were met, despite a cohort with more comorbidities than in most previous trials. Complication rates were low and shock efficacy was high. These results demonstrate the 5-year S-ICD safety and efficacy for a large, diverse cohort of S-ICD recipients. (Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator [S-ICD] System Post Approval Study [PAS]; NCT01736618).

摘要

背景

皮下植入式心律转复除颤器(S-ICD)的研发旨在避免与经静脉植入式心律转复除颤器(TV-ICD)导线相关的并发症。此前已有研究证明该设备的安全性和有效性,但这些研究纳入的是临床特征不典型的患者或随访时间有限的患者。

目的

S-ICD PAS(皮下植入式心律转复除颤器系统上市后研究)是一项在美国多个中心开展的真实世界、多中心注册研究,旨在评估 S-ICD 在一组不同患者和植入中心中的长期安全性和有效性。

方法

符合标准 S-ICD 适应证的患者入组 86 家美国中心,观察时间最长达 5 年。有效性终点为首次和最终电击有效性。安全性终点为与 S-ICD 系统或植入程序直接相关的并发症。使用预设的性能目标评估终点。

结果

共前瞻性纳入 1643 例患者,中位随访时间为 4.2 年。所有预设的安全性和有效性终点目标均达到。离散性室性心动过速或心室颤动发作的电击有效性率为 98.4%,且随随访年限的不同无显著差异(P=0.68)。S-ICD 相关和电极相关无并发症率分别为 93.4%和 99.3%。仅有 1.6%的患者因起搏需求更换为 TV-ICD。累积全因死亡率为 21.7%。

结论

在迄今为止最大规模的 S-ICD 前瞻性研究中,尽管患者的合并症较大多数既往试验更多,但所有研究终点均达到。并发症发生率低,电击有效性高。这些结果表明,在一个大型、多样化的 S-ICD 患者队列中,S-ICD 可实现 5 年的安全性和有效性。(皮下植入式心律转复除颤器[S-ICD]系统上市后研究[PAS];NCT01736618)。

相似文献

1
Postapproval Study of a Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator System.皮下植入式心脏复律除颤器系统的上市后研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Aug 1;82(5):383-397. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.05.034.
2
1-Year Prospective Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes and Shocks: The Subcutaneous ICD Post Approval Study.1 年期临床转归和电击事件的前瞻性评估:皮下 ICD 获批后研究。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Nov;6(12):1537-1550. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.05.036. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
3
Efficacy and Safety of Appropriate Shocks and Antitachycardia Pacing in Transvenous and Subcutaneous Implantable Defibrillators: Analysis of All Appropriate Therapy in the PRAETORIAN Trial.经静脉和皮下植入式除颤器中适当电击和抗心动过速起搏的疗效和安全性:PRAETORIAN 试验中所有适当治疗的分析。
Circulation. 2022 Feb;145(5):321-329. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.057816. Epub 2021 Nov 14.
4
Shock Without Wires: A Look at Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Compared to Transvenous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator for Ventricular Arrhythmias.无导线除颤器:皮下植入式除颤器与经静脉植入式除颤器治疗室性心律失常的比较。
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2022 Sep;47(9):100927. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2021.100927. Epub 2021 Jul 3.
5
Primary Results From the Understanding Outcomes With the S-ICD in Primary Prevention Patients With Low Ejection Fraction (UNTOUCHED) Trial.UNTOUCHED 试验:在射血分数较低的原发性预防患者中使用 S-ICD 的主要结果。
Circulation. 2021 Jan 5;143(1):7-17. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.048728. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
6
Safety and efficacy of a totally subcutaneous implantable-cardioverter defibrillator.完全皮下植入式心脏除颤器的安全性和有效性。
Circulation. 2013 Aug 27;128(9):944-53. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003042.
7
Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Subcutaneous Versus Transvenous Implantable Defibrillator Therapy.皮下与经静脉植入式除颤器治疗的长期临床结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Nov 8;68(19):2047-2055. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.08.044.
8
The need for a subsequent transvenous system in patients implanted with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.需要在植入皮下植入式心律转复除颤器的患者中使用后续的经静脉系统。
Heart Rhythm. 2022 Dec;19(12):1958-1964. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.06.030. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
9
The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in review.皮下植入式心律转复除颤器述评。
Am Heart J. 2019 Nov;217:131-139. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.08.010. Epub 2019 Aug 17.
10
Implant and Midterm Outcomes of the Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Registry: The EFFORTLESS Study.皮下植入式心脏复律除颤器注册研究的植入和中期结果:EFFORTLESS 研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Aug 15;70(7):830-841. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.040.

引用本文的文献

1
Proper QRS for EMBLEM S-ICD Across Micra Recipients-Pilot Study.针对植入美敦力Micra起搏器患者的EMBLEM皮下植入式心律转复除颤器的合适QRS波群——初步研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 20;14(5):1420. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051420.
2
Long-Term Follow-Up of the S-ICD: A 10-Years Follow-Up Study of a Large Single Center Cohort.皮下植入式心律转复除颤器的长期随访:一项大型单中心队列的10年随访研究。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2025 Apr;48(4):443-446. doi: 10.1111/pace.15173. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
3
A case of pioneering subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator intervention in Timothy syndrome.
一例蒂莫西综合征患者的经皮皮下植入式心律转复除颤器介入治疗。
BMC Pediatr. 2024 Nov 13;24(1):729. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-05216-w.
4
Performance and Safety of the Extravascular Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Through Long-Term Follow-Up: Final Results From the Pivotal Study.经长期随访的血管外植入式心脏复律除颤器的性能与安全性:关键研究的最终结果
Circulation. 2025 Jan 28;151(4):322-332. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.071795. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
5
Subcutaneous versus Transvenous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease Requiring Dialysis: Extended Long-Term Retrospective Multicenter Follow-Up.终末期肾病需要透析患者皮下与经静脉植入式心律转复除颤器:长期回顾性多中心随访扩展研究
J Pers Med. 2024 Aug 17;14(8):870. doi: 10.3390/jpm14080870.
6
Late malfunction of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in a patient with advanced emphysema.晚期肺气肿患者皮下植入式心律转复除颤器出现故障
HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2024 Apr 18;10(7):468-472. doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2024.04.006. eCollection 2024 Jul.
7
Occurrence of premature battery depletion in a large multicentre registry of subcutaneous cardioverter-defibrillator patients.大型皮下埋藏式除颤器患者多中心注册研究中电池过早耗竭的发生。
Europace. 2024 Jul 2;26(7). doi: 10.1093/europace/euae170.
8
Incidence, implications, and management of sense-B-noise failure in subcutaneous cardioverter-defibrillator patients: insights from a large multicentre registry.皮下植入式心律转复除颤器患者感知噪声失败的发生率、影响及处理:来自大型多中心注册研究的启示。
Europace. 2024 Jun 3;26(6). doi: 10.1093/europace/euae161.
9
[Treatment with cardiac electronic implantable devices].[心脏植入式电子设备治疗]
Herz. 2024 Jun;49(3):233-246. doi: 10.1007/s00059-024-05246-1. Epub 2024 May 6.
10
Sex differences among subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients: a propensity-matched, multicentre, international analysis from the i-SUSI project.皮下植入式心律转复除颤器受者的性别差异:i-SUSI 项目的一项倾向评分匹配、多中心、国际分析。
Europace. 2024 May 2;26(5). doi: 10.1093/europace/euae115.