• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

皮下植入式心律转复除颤器受者的性别差异:i-SUSI 项目的一项倾向评分匹配、多中心、国际分析。

Sex differences among subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients: a propensity-matched, multicentre, international analysis from the i-SUSI project.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Electrophysiology & Cardiac Pacing, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Via Carlo Parea 4, 20138 Milan, Italy.

Department of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.

出版信息

Europace. 2024 May 2;26(5). doi: 10.1093/europace/euae115.

DOI:10.1093/europace/euae115
PMID:38696701
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11100525/
Abstract

AIMS

Women have been historically underrepresented in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) trials. No data on sex differences regarding subcutaneous ICDs (S-ICD) carriers have been described. Aim of our study was to investigate sex-related differences among unselected S-ICD recipients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive patients enrolled in the multicentre, international i-SUSI registry were analysed. Comparisons between sexes were performed using a 1:1 propensity matching adjusted analysis for age, body mass index (BMI), left ventricular function, and substrate. The primary outcome was the rate of appropriate shocks during follow-up. Inappropriate shocks and other device-related complications were deemed secondary outcomes. A total of 1698 patients were extracted from the i-SUSI registry; 399 (23.5%) were females. After propensity matching, two cohorts of 374 patients presenting similar baseline characteristics were analysed. Despite similar periprocedural characteristics and a matched BMI, women resulted at lower risk of conversion failure as per PRAETORIAN score (73.4% vs. 81.3%, P = 0.049). Over a median follow-up time of 26.5 [12.7-42.5] months, appropriate shocks were more common in the male cohort (rate/year 3.4% vs. 1.7%; log-rank P = 0.049), while no significant differences in device-related complications (rate/year: 6.3% vs. 5.8%; log-rank P = 0.595) and inappropriate shocks (rate/year: 4.3% vs. 3.1%; log-rank P = 0.375) were observed. After controlling for confounders, sex remained significantly associated with the primary outcome (aHR 1.648; CI 0.999-2.655, P = 0.048), while not resulting predictor of inappropriate shocks and device-related complications.

CONCLUSION

In a propensity-matched cohort of S-ICD recipients, women are less likely to experience appropriate ICD therapy, while not showing higher risk of device-related complications.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0473876.

摘要

目的

女性在植入式心脏复律除颤器 (ICD) 试验中历来代表性不足。尚未描述皮下 ICD(S-ICD)携带者的性别差异数据。我们的研究目的是调查未选择的 S-ICD 受者的性别相关差异。

方法和结果

对多中心国际 i-SUSI 注册研究中的连续患者进行了分析。使用年龄、体重指数 (BMI)、左心室功能和基质的 1:1 倾向匹配调整分析比较了性别间的差异。主要结局是随访期间适当电击的发生率。不适当的电击和其他与设备相关的并发症被认为是次要结局。从 i-SUSI 登记处提取了 1698 例患者;其中 399 例(23.5%)为女性。在进行倾向匹配后,分析了两组具有相似基线特征的 374 例患者。尽管围手术期特征相似且 BMI 匹配,但女性根据 PRAETORIAN 评分发生转换失败的风险较低(73.4%比 81.3%,P=0.049)。在中位数为 26.5[12.7-42.5]个月的随访期间,男性组更常见适当电击(发生率/年 3.4%比 1.7%;对数秩 P=0.049),而设备相关并发症(发生率/年:6.3%比 5.8%;对数秩 P=0.595)和不适当电击(发生率/年:4.3%比 3.1%;对数秩 P=0.375)无显著差异。在校正混杂因素后,性别仍与主要结局显著相关(aHR 1.648;99%CI 0.999-2.655,P=0.048),而不是不适当电击和设备相关并发症的预测因素。

结论

在 S-ICD 受者的倾向匹配队列中,女性发生适当 ICD 治疗的可能性较低,而设备相关并发症的风险并未增加。

临床试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT0473876。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a32/11100525/6f3c7b59edc1/euae115f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a32/11100525/31d2ce017699/euae115_ga.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a32/11100525/67bcbefde061/euae115f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a32/11100525/2390a07c367e/euae115f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a32/11100525/a13430ae642a/euae115f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a32/11100525/6f3c7b59edc1/euae115f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a32/11100525/31d2ce017699/euae115_ga.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a32/11100525/67bcbefde061/euae115f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a32/11100525/2390a07c367e/euae115f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a32/11100525/a13430ae642a/euae115f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a32/11100525/6f3c7b59edc1/euae115f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Sex differences among subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients: a propensity-matched, multicentre, international analysis from the i-SUSI project.皮下植入式心律转复除颤器受者的性别差异:i-SUSI 项目的一项倾向评分匹配、多中心、国际分析。
Europace. 2024 May 2;26(5). doi: 10.1093/europace/euae115.
2
Propensity score matched comparison of subcutaneous and transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in the SIMPLE and EFFORTLESS studies.SIMPLE 和 EFFORTLESS 研究中皮下植入式和经静脉植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗的倾向评分匹配比较。
Europace. 2018 Sep 1;20(FI2):f240-f248. doi: 10.1093/europace/euy083.
3
Differences in underlying cardiac substrate among S-ICD recipients and its impact on long-term device-related outcomes: Real-world insights from the iSUSI registry.皮下植入式心律转复除颤器(S-ICD)植入者潜在心脏基质的差异及其对长期器械相关结局的影响:来自iSUSI注册研究的真实世界见解
Heart Rhythm. 2024 Apr;21(4):410-418. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.12.007. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
4
Intensive recreational athletes in the prospective multinational ICD Sports Safety Registry: Results from the European cohort.前瞻性多国 ICD 运动安全注册研究中的高强度娱乐运动员:来自欧洲队列的结果。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019 May;26(7):764-775. doi: 10.1177/2047487319834852. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
5
Dual- vs. single-chamber defibrillators for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death: long-term follow-up of the Défibrillateur Automatique Implantable-Prévention Primaire registry.双腔与单腔除颤器用于心源性猝死的一级预防:埋藏式自动复律除颤器-初级预防注册研究的长期随访。
Europace. 2017 Sep 1;19(9):1478-1484. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw230.
6
Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and defibrillation testing: A propensity-matched pilot study.皮下植入式心脏除颤器和除颤测试:一项倾向评分匹配的初步研究。
Heart Rhythm. 2021 Dec;18(12):2072-2079. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.06.1201. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
7
Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) Therapy in Women-Data From a Multicenter French Registry.女性原发性预防植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)治疗——来自法国多中心注册研究的数据
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Feb 12;5(2):e002756. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002756.
8
Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Subcutaneous Versus Transvenous Implantable Defibrillator Therapy.皮下与经静脉植入式除颤器治疗的长期临床结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Nov 8;68(19):2047-2055. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.08.044.
9
Long-Term Experience With the Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in Teenagers and Young Adults.青少年和年轻成人中皮下植入式心脏复律除颤器的长期经验
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Dec 26;3(13):1499-1506. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.08.017. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
10
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with CKD: a propensity-matched mortality analysis.慢性肾脏病患者植入式心脏复律除颤器:倾向匹配的死亡率分析
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Jul 7;10(7):1119-27. doi: 10.2215/CJN.11121114. Epub 2015 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Do gender differences persist in ICD implantation in patients with acute on chronic heart failure?在慢性心力衰竭急性发作患者中,ICD植入方面的性别差异是否持续存在?
Future Cardiol. 2025 May;21(6):365-370. doi: 10.1080/14796678.2025.2484958. Epub 2025 Mar 30.
2
Clinical performance of subcutaneous vs. transvenous implantable defibrillator in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy: .皮下植入式除颤器与经静脉植入式除颤器在缺血性心肌病患者中的临床性能:.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Feb 19;12:1539125. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1539125. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of the PRAETORIAN score in a large subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator collective: Usefulness in clinical routine.验证 Praetorian 评分在大型皮下植入式心脏复律除颤器群体中的有效性:在临床常规中的实用性。
Heart Rhythm. 2024 Jul;21(7):1057-1063. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.02.032. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
2
Predictive value of the PRAETORIAN score for defibrillation test success in patients with subcutaneous ICD: A subanalysis of the PRAETORIAN-DFT trial.皮下植入式心律转复除颤器患者中PRAETORIAN评分对除颤测试成功的预测价值:PRAETORIAN-DFT试验的亚组分析
Heart Rhythm. 2024 Jun;21(6):836-844. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.02.005. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
3
Differences in underlying cardiac substrate among S-ICD recipients and its impact on long-term device-related outcomes: Real-world insights from the iSUSI registry.
皮下植入式心律转复除颤器(S-ICD)植入者潜在心脏基质的差异及其对长期器械相关结局的影响:来自iSUSI注册研究的真实世界见解
Heart Rhythm. 2024 Apr;21(4):410-418. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.12.007. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
4
Modern subcutaneous implantable defibrillator therapy in patients with cardiomyopathies and channelopathies: data from a large multicentre registry.现代皮下植入式除颤器治疗心肌病和通道病患者:来自大型多中心注册研究的数据。
Europace. 2023 Aug 2;25(9). doi: 10.1093/europace/euad239.
5
Postapproval Study of a Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator System.皮下植入式心脏复律除颤器系统的上市后研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Aug 1;82(5):383-397. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.05.034.
6
Procedure, management, and outcome of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator extraction in clinical practice.在临床实践中皮下植入式心律转复除颤器取出术的程序、管理和结果。
Europace. 2023 Jun 2;25(6). doi: 10.1093/europace/euad158.
7
Inappropriate Shock Rates and Long-Term Complications due to Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in Patients With and Without Heart Failure: Results From a Multicenter, International Registry.心力衰竭患者与非心力衰竭患者皮下植入式心律转复除颤器所致不适当电击率及长期并发症:一项多中心国际注册研究的结果
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2023 Jan;16(1):e011404. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.122.011404. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
8
Ventricular Arrhythmias and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy in Women: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.女性室性心律失常与植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗:一项倾向评分匹配分析
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2022 Dec;8(12):1553-1562. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
9
Pre-implant predictors of inappropriate shocks with the third-generation subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator.第三代皮下植入式心律转复除颤器不适当电击的植入前预测因素。
Europace. 2022 Dec 9;24(12):1952-1959. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac134.
10
Inequality between women and men in ICD implantation.女性和男性在植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)植入方面的不平等。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2022 Jun 25;41:101075. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101075. eCollection 2022 Aug.