Division of Trauma, Burns and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA.
Division of Trauma, Burns and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA.
Surgery. 2023 Oct;174(4):1056-1062. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.06.024. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
The "vices-paradox" describes the paradoxical association between illicit substance use and decreased mortality risk in trauma patients. Cocaine's vasoconstrictive effects may decrease hemorrhage but also increase the risk of thromboembolic complications. To clarify the effects of cocaine use on trauma patients, we compared the risk of mortality and thromboembolic complications in patients screening positive for cocaine with those screening negative.
We searched the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database to identify patients 18 years and over who had presented with a drug and alcohol screen on admission between 2017 and 2019. After excluding all patients who had tested positive for alcohol and substances other than cocaine, we then compared the clinical outcomes of patients who were positive and negative for cocaine use.
Of the 312,553 patients identified, 11,942 (3.82%) had tested positive for cocaine. Cocaine users were significantly more likely to present with stab (8.0% vs 3.1%) or gunshot wounds (8.0% vs 3.0%) but had lower rates of mortality (3.6% vs 4.7%), myocardial infarction (0.1% vs 0.2%,) and cerebrovascular accident (0.3% vs 0.4%,). After controlling for covariates, the risk of death, myocardial infarction, and cerebrovascular accident did not significantly differ between cocaine and non-cocaine users.
Trauma patients positive for cocaine have similar risks of death and thromboembolic complications and so have a similar prognosis to patients negative for all drugs or alcohol, indicating that the "vices-paradox" does not apply to cocaine use. However, these patients more commonly present after penetrating trauma, suggesting cocaine use in hazardous environments.
“恶习悖论”描述了创伤患者中非法物质使用与降低死亡率风险之间的矛盾关系。可卡因的血管收缩作用可能会减少出血,但也会增加血栓栓塞并发症的风险。为了阐明可卡因使用对创伤患者的影响,我们比较了可卡因检测阳性患者与可卡因检测阴性患者的死亡率和血栓栓塞并发症风险。
我们搜索了创伤质量改进计划数据库,以确定在 2017 年至 2019 年期间入院时进行药物和酒精筛查的 18 岁及以上患者。排除所有酒精和可卡因以外的物质检测阳性的患者后,我们比较了可卡因使用阳性和阴性患者的临床结局。
在确定的 312553 名患者中,有 11942 名(3.82%)可卡因检测阳性。可卡因使用者更有可能出现刺伤(8.0% vs 3.1%)或枪伤(8.0% vs 3.0%),但死亡率(3.6% vs 4.7%)、心肌梗死(0.1% vs 0.2%)和脑血管意外(0.3% vs 0.4%)的发生率较低。在控制了协变量后,可卡因和非可卡因使用者的死亡、心肌梗死和脑血管意外风险没有显著差异。
可卡因检测阳性的创伤患者的死亡和血栓栓塞并发症风险相似,因此与所有药物或酒精检测阴性的患者具有相似的预后,表明“恶习悖论”不适用于可卡因使用。然而,这些患者更常见于穿透性创伤后,表明可卡因在危险环境中使用。