Department of Human Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
J Youth Adolesc. 2023 Nov;52(11):2261-2284. doi: 10.1007/s10964-023-01828-0. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
Despite the growing cultural diversity worldwide, there is scarce research on how socialization processes prepare youth to respond to increasing multicultural demands and the degree to which these socialization opportunities inform youth academic functioning. This study used a person-centered approach to identify profiles or niches based on the degree and consistency of multicultural socialization experiences across school, peer, and family settings and to examine the associations between identified niches and markers of academic functioning (i.e., emotional and behavioral academic engagement, academic aspirations and expectations) in a sample of adolescents (N = 717; M = 13.73 years). Participants (49.9% girls) were from the U.S. Southwest and represented multiple ethno-racial backgrounds (31.8% Hispanic/Latinx, 31.5% Multiethnic, 25.7% White, 7.3% Black or African American, 1.4% Asian American or Pacific Islander, 1.4% American Indian or Alaska Native, and 1% Arab, Middle Eastern, or North African). Six distinct multicultural socialization niches were identified. Three niches had similar patterns across school-peer-family but ranged in the degree of socialization. The cross-setting similar higher socialization niche (Niche 6) demonstrated greater socialization than the cross-setting similar moderate (Niche 5) and lower socialization (Niche 4) niches, which had moderate and lower socialization, respectively. Three niches demonstrated cross-setting dissimilarity which ranged in the type of cross-setting contrast and the degree of socialization. The cross-setting dissimilar school contrast socialization niche (Niche 3) had greater dissimilarities between socialization opportunities in the school setting compared to the peer and family settings and demonstrated the lowest levels of socialization of all niches. The other two niches, the cross-setting dissimilar peer contrast (Niche 1) and greater peer contrast socialization (Niche 2) niches had larger dissimilarities between socialization opportunities in the peer setting than the school and family settings. In the former, however, the contrast was lower, and socialization ranged between very low to low. In the latter, the contrast was higher and socialization ranged from very low to moderate. Most adolescents were in the cross-setting similar lower socialization niche or in the cross-setting dissimilar niches. Adolescents in the cross-setting similar higher multicultural socialization demonstrated greater emotional and behavioral academic engagement than adolescents in most of the other niches. Adolescents in the cross-setting dissimilar school contrast niches demonstrated lower emotional and behavioral academic engagement and lower academic expectations than adolescents in some of the other niches. The results emphasize the collective role of school, peer, and family multicultural socialization on emotional and behavioral academic engagement.
尽管全球文化多样性不断增长,但关于社会化过程如何使年轻人做好应对日益增加的多元文化需求的准备,以及这些社会化机会在何种程度上影响年轻人的学业表现,相关研究仍然很少。本研究采用了一种以个体为中心的方法,根据青少年在学校、同伴和家庭环境中多元文化社会化经验的程度和一致性,确定了基于不同程度和一致性的多元文化社会化经验的特征或利基,并在一个青少年样本中,研究了确定的利基与学业表现的标志(即情感和行为学术参与、学术抱负和期望)之间的关联(N=717;M=13.73 岁)。参与者(49.9%为女孩)来自美国西南部,代表了多种族裔背景(31.8%为西班牙裔/拉丁裔,31.5%为多种族裔,25.7%为白人,7.3%为黑人或非裔美国人,1.4%为亚裔或太平洋岛民,1.4%为美国印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民,1%为阿拉伯人、中东或北非)。确定了六个不同的多元文化社会化利基。三个利基在学校-同伴-家庭中具有相似的模式,但社会化程度不同。跨环境相似的高度社会化利基(利基 6)的社会化程度高于跨环境相似的中度(利基 5)和低度(利基 4)利基,后两者的社会化程度分别为中度和低度。三个利基表现出跨环境的差异,其差异程度和类型在跨环境的对比和社会化程度上各不相同。跨环境差异学校对比社会化利基(利基 3)在学校环境中的社会化机会与同伴和家庭环境中的社会化机会之间存在更大的差异,其社会化程度也是所有利基中最低的。其他两个利基,跨环境差异同伴对比(利基 1)和更大同伴对比社会化(利基 2)利基在同伴环境中的社会化机会与学校和家庭环境中的社会化机会之间存在更大的差异。然而,在前者中,这种差异较小,社会化程度介于非常低到低。在后一种情况下,差异更大,社会化程度从非常低到中等。大多数青少年处于跨环境相似的低度社会化利基或跨环境差异的利基中。处于跨环境相似的高度多元文化社会化利基中的青少年比其他大多数利基中的青少年表现出更大的情感和行为学术参与。处于跨环境差异学校对比利基的青少年表现出较低的情感和行为学术参与以及较低的学术期望,而其他一些利基中的青少年则表现出较高的情感和行为学术参与和较高的学术期望。研究结果强调了学校、同伴和家庭多元文化社会化在情感和行为学术参与方面的共同作用。